Mainecat Posted October 28, 2019 Share Posted October 28, 2019 And again...... https://www.politico.com/news/2019/10/18/state-department-hillary-clinton-emails-051380 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted October 28, 2019 Share Posted October 28, 2019 She’s not the President. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Momorider Posted October 28, 2019 Share Posted October 28, 2019 State department 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted October 28, 2019 Author Share Posted October 28, 2019 Maybe you guys can talk about her pant suits. Meanwhile Trump uses a unsecured phone. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted October 28, 2019 Share Posted October 28, 2019 13 minutes ago, Zambroski said: She’s not the President. She's not? But the popular vote. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Skidooski Posted October 28, 2019 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted October 28, 2019 4 minutes ago, Mainecat said: Maybe you guys can talk about her pant suits. Meanwhile Trump uses a unsecured phone. Don't fret, his aide will smash it with a hammer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edmo Posted October 28, 2019 Share Posted October 28, 2019 5 minutes ago, Mainecat said: Maybe you guys can talk about her pant suits. Meanwhile Trump uses a unsecured phone. My fave was the 13000 dollar vacuum cleaner bag outfit. That was epic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spin_dry Posted October 28, 2019 Share Posted October 28, 2019 Lock him up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XCR1250 Posted October 28, 2019 Share Posted October 28, 2019 In total, more than 30,000 emails were deleted "because they were personal and private about matters that I believed were within the scope of my personal privacy," Clinton told reporters in March of 2015, as the controversy around her private emails was growing. "They had nothing to do with work," Clinton added. "I didn't see any reason to keep them ... no one wants their personal emails made public, and I think most people understand that and respect that privacy." Clinton said her team "went through a thorough process" to identify work-related emails, and she said he had "absolute confidence that everything that could be in any way connected to work is now in the possession of the State Department." However, after a year-long investigation, the FBI recovered more than 17,000 emails that had been deleted or otherwise not turned over to the State Department, and many of them were work-related, the FBI has said. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted October 28, 2019 Author Share Posted October 28, 2019 A 3 year investigation....2 under complete Republican control found zippo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
revkevsdi Posted October 28, 2019 Share Posted October 28, 2019 16 minutes ago, XCR1250 said: In total, more than 30,000 emails were deleted "because they were personal and private about matters that I believed were within the scope of my personal privacy," Clinton told reporters in March of 2015, as the controversy around her private emails was growing. "They had nothing to do with work," Clinton added. "I didn't see any reason to keep them ... no one wants their personal emails made public, and I think most people understand that and respect that privacy." Clinton said her team "went through a thorough process" to identify work-related emails, and she said he had "absolute confidence that everything that could be in any way connected to work is now in the possession of the State Department." However, after a year-long investigation, the FBI recovered more than 17,000 emails that had been deleted or otherwise not turned over to the State Department, and many of them were work-related, the FBI has said. Remember when Bush" lost' 22 million emails, was found in comtempt and you didn't give a shit? These were the emails from when he was staging his war in Iraq that was based on lies. The lies you didn't give a shit about. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XCR1250 Posted October 28, 2019 Share Posted October 28, 2019 6 minutes ago, revkevsdi said: Remember when Bush" lost' 22 million emails, was found in comtempt and you didn't give a shit? These were the emails from when he was staging his war in Iraq that was based on lies. The lies you didn't give a shit about. “One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line.” President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998. “If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction program.” President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998. “Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face.” Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998. “He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983.” Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998 “[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq’s refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs.” Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998. “Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process.” Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998. “Hussein has … chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies.” Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999. “There is no doubt that . Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies.” Letter to President Bush, Signed by Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL,) and others, Dec, 5, 2001. “We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them.” Sen. Carl Levin (d, MI), Sept. 19, 2002. “We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country.” Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002. “Iraq’s search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power.” Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002. “We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seing and developing weapons of mass destruction.” Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002. “The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons…” Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002. “I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force — if necessary — to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security.” Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002. “There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years . We also should remember we have alway s underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction.” Sen. Jay Rockerfeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002, “He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do.” Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002. “In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons.” Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002 “We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction. “[W]ithout question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime … He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation. And now he has continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction … So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real … Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edmo Posted October 28, 2019 Share Posted October 28, 2019 “I was for the Iraq war before I wasn’t.” Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Skidooski Posted October 28, 2019 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted October 28, 2019 18 minutes ago, Mainecat said: A 3 year investigation....2 under complete Republican control found zippo. But did they find Collusion? Can we impeach over anything found in this investigation? Like you said 3 years and nothing so...... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
revkevsdi Posted October 28, 2019 Share Posted October 28, 2019 8 minutes ago, XCR1250 said: “One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line.” President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998. “If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction program.” President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998. “Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face.” Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998. “He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983.” Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998 “[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq’s refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs.” Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998. “Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process.” Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998. “Hussein has … chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies.” Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999. “There is no doubt that . Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies.” Letter to President Bush, Signed by Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL,) and others, Dec, 5, 2001. “We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them.” Sen. Carl Levin (d, MI), Sept. 19, 2002. “We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country.” Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002. “Iraq’s search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power.” Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002. “We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seing and developing weapons of mass destruction.” Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002. “The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons…” Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002. “I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force — if necessary — to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security.” Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002. “There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years . We also should remember we have alway s underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction.” Sen. Jay Rockerfeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002, “He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do.” Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002. “In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons.” Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002 “We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction. “[W]ithout question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime … He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation. And now he has continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction … So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real … Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003. "The Buck stops here" Unless you are a Republican President who cherry picked intel to justify an attack on Iraq. Then it is everyone else's fault. It's also other people's fault if you were attacked by Saudi nationals and chose to ignore Saudi Arabia while they continued to use oil revenues to spread the most radical version of Islam. PS Clinton bombed the shit out of Iraq to decrease their WMD program. How much did that cost? How many Mercan lives were lost compared to the Bush/Cheney plan? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
revkevsdi Posted October 28, 2019 Share Posted October 28, 2019 4 minutes ago, Skidooski said: But did they find Collusion? Can we impeach over anything found in this investigation? Like you said 3 years and nothing so...... Seems like Clinton continues to be totally exonerated. She spent hours testifying under oath. Think your orange God could testify under oath? Would you continue to defend him after he was caught lying under oath? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XCR1250 Posted October 28, 2019 Share Posted October 28, 2019 Bill Clinton in 1998: I don't think we're pretending that we can get everything, so this is – I think – we are being very honest about what our ability is. We are lessening, degrading his ability to use this. The weapons of mass destruction are the threat of the future. I think the president explained very clearly to the American people that this is the threat of the 21st century. What it means is that we know we can't get everything, but degrading is the right word Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted October 28, 2019 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted October 28, 2019 33 minutes ago, Mainecat said: A 3 year investigation....2 under complete Republican control found zippo. Wrong. Because the claim of no "systemic" problem doesn't mean there were not significant violations. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted October 28, 2019 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted October 28, 2019 8 minutes ago, revkevsdi said: Seems like Clinton continues to be totally exonerated. She spent hours testifying under oath. Think your orange God could testify under oath? Would you continue to defend him after he was caught lying under oath? And she lied under oath. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Skidooski Posted October 28, 2019 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted October 28, 2019 12 minutes ago, revkevsdi said: Seems like Clinton continues to be totally exonerated. She spent hours testifying under oath. Think your orange God could testify under oath? Would you continue to defend him after he was caught lying under oath? 3 year investigation that turned up nothing sounds awfully familiar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1jkw Posted October 28, 2019 Share Posted October 28, 2019 32 minutes ago, Edmo said: “I was for the Iraq war before I wasn’t.” Many people were in fact I would say most were, I was, Trump was too, all based on the lies told by the GWB Admin. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted October 28, 2019 Author Share Posted October 28, 2019 25 minutes ago, revkevsdi said: Seems like Clinton continues to be totally exonerated. She spent hours testifying under oath. Think your orange God could testify under oath? Would you continue to defend him after he was caught lying under oath? At least she testified like a real American unlike those fuckin commie republicans who refuse. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted October 28, 2019 Author Share Posted October 28, 2019 15 minutes ago, Highmark said: Wrong. Because the claim of no "systemic" problem doesn't mean there were not significant violations. As usual you never read a report. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Rigid1 Posted October 28, 2019 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted October 28, 2019 4 years later the media is still trying to tell us she is clean as a whistle.. Like why even talk about her or the emails if there was never a problem?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted October 28, 2019 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted October 28, 2019 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Mainecat said: As usual you never read a report. Dude I own you on your own links all the time. I did read the article and it says EXACTLY what I posted. While they didn't think the violations were "systemic" there were violations with her server none the less. Second paragraph. The three-year-long investigation by State’s Bureau of Diplomatic Security concluded that 38 individuals committed a total of 91 security violations involving emails sent to or from Clinton’s private server. Edited October 28, 2019 by Highmark 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.