Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted January 22, 2019 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted January 22, 2019 What an idiot. “Millennials and people, you know, Gen Z and all these folks that will come after us are looking up and we’re like: ‘The world is gonna end in 12 years if we don’t address climate change and your biggest issue is how are we gonna pay for it?'" Ocasio-Cortez said. The Democratic Socialist said the fight against climate change is war and that it’s “our World War II. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edmo Posted January 22, 2019 Share Posted January 22, 2019 12 years eh? Well that helps with the retirement planning. Looks like hookers and blow it is!!! 1 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted January 22, 2019 Share Posted January 22, 2019 She fits right into the alt left cult here Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
racer254 Posted January 22, 2019 Share Posted January 22, 2019 1 minute ago, Rod Johnson said: She fits right into the alt left cult here LOL Funny but true. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted January 22, 2019 Share Posted January 22, 2019 Lol at the thread and the 3 stooges Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edmo Posted January 22, 2019 Share Posted January 22, 2019 2 minutes ago, Mainecat said: Lol at the thread and the 3 stooges Someone piss in your cereal again today? The prediction was funny, dont you think? 12 years!!!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XCR1250 Posted January 22, 2019 Share Posted January 22, 2019 I've heard the same thing since the mid 1960's, except then it was an approaching Ice Age. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gold Member Kivalo Posted January 22, 2019 Gold Member Share Posted January 22, 2019 I cant believe we willingly elect these retards. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted January 22, 2019 Share Posted January 22, 2019 I love her! I hope the Dems let her up on stage during the debates. I know the DNC will pick the winners themselves anyway so, why not have some fun in the process? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted January 22, 2019 Author Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted January 22, 2019 (edited) Older article but relevant none the less. https://www.forbes.com/sites/larrybell/2013/09/24/alarmists-are-in-way-over-their-heads-on-rising-ocean-claims/#1d4839841194 So then, how does IPCC arrive at its alarmist conclusions? When in doubt, and they always are, they just make them up based upon hypothetical models that have yet to comply with observed conditions. And as for those models, it’s important to realize that no overall sea level change theory encompassing thermal expansion of oceans, melting of mountain glaciers, and changes, both positive and negative, of Greenland and Antarctic sheets even exists. A leading researcher, Bruce Douglas, termed all of this a “puzzle”, while famed Scripps Institute oceanographer Walter Munk calls it an “enigma”. Perhaps it’s like Churchill’s description of Soviet Russia, “a riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma”. In any case, let’s review what IPCC has projected in their Summary for Policymakers reports crafted for prime time media audiences: The first assessment report (1990) showed a rising sea level range of 10-367 cm by the year 2100. That’s some range! The second report (1996) narrowed the range to 3-124 cm by 2100. The third report (2001) showed the range to be 11-77 cm by 2100. The fourth report (2007) originally showed 14-43 cm in draft…then changed it to 18-59 cm in final printed version. The good news here, if there really is any, is that each of the successive summary report maximum estimates decreased, all being much smaller than the 600 cm sea level rise trumpeted by former NASA Goddard Institute for Space Science activist James Hansen and climate multi-millionaire Gore. A draft of the IPCC’s 5th report that was leaked to the press now projects a sea level rise by 2100 of 45-110 cm (16-40 inches) …about double of what they showed six years ago. What is particularly remarkable about this is that the report shows zero sea rise values before 1880, while the coral data and coastal sediments do. Tidal gauge data show no acceleration during strong warming between 1920-40 (a period when CO2 concentrations were lower)…with levels continuing to rise during slight cooling of 1940-75, and also during a recent 17-year warming “pause”. Yet IPCC-2013 shows increasing values (acceleration) throughout the entire period. It appears that this record may have been falsified. Edited January 22, 2019 by Highmark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
irv Posted January 22, 2019 Share Posted January 22, 2019 (edited) Is she Al Gore's illegitimate daughter? https://prepareforchange.net/2018/01/01/al-gores-10-global-warming-predictions-12-years-later-none-happened/ Edited January 22, 2019 by irv 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xtralettucetomatoe580 Posted January 22, 2019 Share Posted January 22, 2019 Holy shit what a stupid thing for her to say... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snopro31 Posted January 22, 2019 Share Posted January 22, 2019 Well the coast lines still arent underwater and coast cities are still dry so many her prediction will be accurate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted January 22, 2019 Share Posted January 22, 2019 2 hours ago, Zambroski said: I love her! I hope the Dems let her up on stage during the debates. I know the DNC will pick the winners themselves anyway so, why not have some fun in the process? They did that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted January 22, 2019 Share Posted January 22, 2019 2 minutes ago, DAVE said: They did that? Ask Slinger. Good luck. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted January 22, 2019 Share Posted January 22, 2019 Just now, Zambroski said: Ask Slinger. Good luck. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted January 22, 2019 Share Posted January 22, 2019 1 minute ago, DAVE said: “GIVING ONE PERSON THE QUESTIONS IN WHAT WAS SUPPOSED TO BE A FAIR MODERATED DEBATE” LIBRULZ: “Meh.....just politics”. Media: “^^^^What they said.” 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1jkw Posted January 22, 2019 Share Posted January 22, 2019 A stupid thing to say, right up there with Mexico is going to pay for the wall. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member steve from amherst Posted January 22, 2019 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted January 22, 2019 Just now, 1jkw said: A stupid thing to say, right up there with Mexico is going to pay for the wall. or lets tax people at 70% 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted January 22, 2019 Share Posted January 22, 2019 Just now, steve from amherst said: or lets tax people at 70% Or, “It’s immoral to have billionaires.” When she is all said and done...a book will be published of these collected gems. She’s both a gift and nightmare for the Dems....and the R’s too! Less nightmare on that side though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.