Jump to content
Check your account email address ×

The Bet


f7ben

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, f7ben said:

I accept the challenge....I have the 20k. Let's get this done

Give me the law firms name, address and number. Edward Jones is no good, because they will not hold your funds in escrow. We have to send certified checks to a law firm that will lock us in. EJ can not lock us in. 

If I have 20 thou invested in EJ, and I lose, how can you get that 20Gs???? YOU CAN'T!!! Ask Woofie, even he won't get involved in this. It has to go through a lawyer, with our money LOCKED IN from the GIT GO. 

 

GET A FUKKEN LAWYER!!! I told you to call a lawyer today!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Polaris 550 said:

Give me the law firms name, address and number. Edward Jones is no good, because they will not hold your funds in escrow. We have to send certified checks to a law firm that will lock us in. EJ can not lock us in. 

If I have 20 thou invested in EJ, and I lose, how can you get that 20Gs???? YOU CAN'T!!! Ask Woofie, even he won't get involved in this. It has to go through a lawyer, with our money LOCKED IN from the GIT GO. 

 

GET A FUKKEN LAWYER!!! I told you to call a lawyer today!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

We dont need to waste the money on lawyers. That's dumb. I'll pay if I lose and you said you were a man of your word as well. 

I simply suggested an EJ account so we could both see that the other had the money. 

Let's agree on an engineering firm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Polaris 550 said:

All other factors being constant, does lug height affect the FINAL DRIVE RATIO on a snowmobile, on a hypothetical, flat hard plane??? 

In other words, will a snowmobile travel further with one rotation of the track with 3" lugs, as compared to that same snowmobile with 1" lugs.  

 BEN do you agree with this post?????  I think this states it concisely. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Polaris 550 said:

 BEN do you agree with this post?????  I think this states it concisely

I'd prefer if it said one rotation of the input gear but it doesn't really matter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, f7ben said:

I'd prefer if it said one rotation of the input gear but it doesn't really matter

OK, let's keep it simple as we can. Do you agree with it, how I worded it? You do agree that if the machine moves further with bigger lugs, that the FINAL DRIVE RATIO is different, right?           In other words, if one rotation of the track with longer/shorter lugs moves the sled a different amount, the FINAL DRIVE RATIO is altered. OK? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Polaris 550 said:

OK, let's keep it simple as we can. Do you agree with it, how I worded it? You do agree that if the machine moves further with bigger lugs, that the FINAL DRIVE RATIO is different, right?           In other words, if one rotation of the track with longer/shorter lugs moves the sled a different amount, the FINAL DRIVE RATIO is altered. OK? 

Yes...I agree

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, f7ben said:

Yes...I agree

OK, good, let's keep it simple. I think that post works ok. It summarizes our hypothesis. Let's work off that.

OK, we need to get a lawyer to lock this in, and get our checks. Then we get a engineer/ instructor to do the calculation. We'll present our case, and they notify the lawyer when they've made their ruling. Actually, a lawyer can find the engineer for us. Problem is it will run more money. 

Be prepared to spend about 3 grand just to get the lawyer going. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, steve from amherst said:

I will not bring him in here. I will run it by him and ask him to email in laymans terms the correct answer and why.

Wait until znutty proves he has the money 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
Just now, Polaris 550 said:

OK, good, let's keep it simple. I think that post works ok. It summarizes our hypothesis. Let's work off that.

OK, we need to get a lawyer to lock this in, and get our checks. Then we get a engineer/ instructor to do the calculation. We'll present our case, and they notify the lawyer when they've made their ruling. Actually, a lawyer can find the engineer for us. Problem is it will run more money. 

Be prepared to spend about 3 grand just to get the lawyer going. 

 

Use escrow company listed above. No need for a lawyer.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Polaris 550 said:

OK, good, let's keep it simple. I think that post works ok. It summarizes our hypothesis. Let's work off that.

OK, we need to get a lawyer to lock this in, and get our checks. Then we get a engineer/ instructor to do the calculation. We'll present our case, and they notify the lawyer when they've made their ruling. Actually, a lawyer can find the engineer for us. Problem is it will run more money. 

Be prepared to spend about 3 grand just to get the lawyer going. 

 

No....that's fucking dumb. I dont wanna pay some lawyer. It's not needed

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, awful knawful said:

Good call. I wouldn't want anyone knowing that I socialize with this bunch of retards either!:lol:

Honestly I just cant understand how people can think hard about this problem and come up with the wrong answer. It's pretty simple

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol

×
×
  • Create New...