NaturallyAspirated Posted December 17, 2018 Share Posted December 17, 2018 3 minutes ago, motonoggin said: What about gravitational waves? Absolutely! Neal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted December 17, 2018 Share Posted December 17, 2018 1 minute ago, f7ben said: The hole in the zone layer was certainly changing final drive ratios for vehicles driving around under it!! Damn CFCs in the final drive! Neal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted December 17, 2018 Author Share Posted December 17, 2018 https://www.ibackshift.com/calculator How are they able to make such precise speed calculations without knowing track circumference ???? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 17, 2018 Share Posted December 17, 2018 1 hour ago, f7ben said: https://www.ibackshift.com/calculator How are they able to make such precise speed calculations without knowing track circumference ???? Ah Dynamo Joe's website. Good dude,spent a weekend riding and testing/tuning with him back in the day. You should email him this question,,,I think he is an Engineer.Once he finishes laughing his fucking ass off I'm sure he will give a technical enough response. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
USA Contributing Member $poorsledder$ Posted December 17, 2018 USA Contributing Member Share Posted December 17, 2018 Rob would have appreciated the effort over all this. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted December 17, 2018 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted December 17, 2018 Roll a rubber band. Jesus H Christ on a Popsicle stick. Did you control the drive rpm variable in that little experiment? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AKIQPilot Posted December 17, 2018 Share Posted December 17, 2018 Why wont Neal take the bet? Hahahahah. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted December 17, 2018 Author Share Posted December 17, 2018 1 minute ago, Highmark said: Roll a rubber band. Jesus H Christ on a Popsicle stick. Did you control the drive rpm variable in that little experiment? Can you imagine how dumb that motherfucker is gonna feel when this hits him like a ton of bricks fucking typical Trump supporter Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted December 17, 2018 Share Posted December 17, 2018 Just now, AKIQPilot said: Why wont Neal take the bet? Hahahahah. I already stated why. I don't accept the conditions. Neal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted December 17, 2018 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted December 17, 2018 Once again from the former Polaris engineer who worked on different factory race teams. Oh by the way he held a number of 1000' speed records (NSSR) for a number of years as well. Hope this helps. Just keep in mind, regardless of lug height, the pitch line in the track determines track length and vehicle speed and that is at the neutral axis or cord line (tensile cord) location in the track. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AKIQPilot Posted December 17, 2018 Share Posted December 17, 2018 Just now, NaturallyAspirated said: I already stated why. I don't accept the conditions. Neal Cuz you know you would lose. Lug height has no affect on final drive raio. Just the same as axle twist and chain stretch has no effect. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted December 17, 2018 Share Posted December 17, 2018 (edited) 3 minutes ago, AKIQPilot said: Cuz you know you would lose. Lug height has no affect on final drive raio. Just the same as axle twist and chain stretch has no effect. I wouldn't take a bet I would lose. Thus I didn't. The conditions are not correct, and I stated as such. And yes, lug height does impact FDR as does axle deflection and chain strech. You are incorrect. Neal Edited December 17, 2018 by NaturallyAspirated Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted December 17, 2018 Author Share Posted December 17, 2018 3 minutes ago, Highmark said: Once again from the former Polaris engineer who worked on different factory race teams. Oh by the way he held a number of 1000' speed records (NSSR) for a number of years as well. Hope this helps. Just keep in mind, regardless of lug height, the pitch line in the track determines track length and vehicle speed and that is at the neutral axis or cord line (tensile cord) location in the track. Stop it.....you're killing my 20k Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AKIQPilot Posted December 17, 2018 Share Posted December 17, 2018 Just now, NaturallyAspirated said: I wouldn't take a bet I would lose. Thus I didn't. The conditions are not correct, and I stated as such. And yes, love g height does impact FDR. You are incorrect. Neal Wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted December 17, 2018 Author Share Posted December 17, 2018 1 minute ago, NaturallyAspirated said: I wouldn't take a bet I would lose. Thus I didn't. The conditions are not correct, and I stated as such. And yes, lug height does impact FDR as does axle deflection and chain strech. You are incorrect. Neal The bet is clearly defined. GIVEN NO OTHER VARIABLES Are you dense? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted December 17, 2018 Share Posted December 17, 2018 Just now, AKIQPilot said: Wrong. You are indeed wrong. Neal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted December 17, 2018 Share Posted December 17, 2018 Just now, f7ben said: The bet is clearly defined. GIVEN NO OTHER VARIABLES Are you dense? The bet is, I concur, thus my disregard for it. I don't agree to the conditions, thus I did not take the bet. That, however doesn't mean your statements are correct. Not at all, I am just pointing out the issues with the thought problem. Neal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AKIQPilot Posted December 17, 2018 Share Posted December 17, 2018 4 minutes ago, NaturallyAspirated said: You are indeed wrong. Neal Prove it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted December 17, 2018 Share Posted December 17, 2018 Just now, AKIQPilot said: Prove it. I already have, you have chosen to ignore, and disregard it. That's your choice. I cannot force you to accept proof. Neal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted December 17, 2018 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted December 17, 2018 6 minutes ago, NaturallyAspirated said: I wouldn't take a bet I would lose. Thus I didn't. The conditions are not correct, and I stated as such. And yes, lug height does impact FDR as does axle deflection and chain strech. You are incorrect. Neal Axle deflection and chain stretch. Jesus someone as smart as Neal is suppose to be yet can't comprehend the constants in this particular equation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted December 17, 2018 Share Posted December 17, 2018 Just now, Highmark said: Axle deflection and chain stretch. Jesus someone as smart as Neal is suppose to be yet can't comprehend the constants in this particular equation. Neither of those were addressed as "unallowed" in the original post on the topic. Ben chooses to constrain, or use wording that can, in his post, thus I disregard the bet as uninteresting to me. All those constraints do not disporve my proposition however, they simply move to ignore. Neal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted December 17, 2018 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted December 17, 2018 1 minute ago, NaturallyAspirated said: Neither of those were addressed as "unallowed" in the original post on the topic. Ben chooses to constrain, or use wording that can, in his post, thus I disregard the bet as uninteresting to me. All those constraints do not disporve my proposition however, they simply move to ignore. Neal The original one I posted years ago? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted December 17, 2018 Share Posted December 17, 2018 5 minutes ago, Highmark said: The original one I posted years ago? Sure, I brought up the issues in that thread, and there was discussion after that about the allowance of those kids of things. As I recall the discussion delved into chais streching/breaking to prove the point. Neal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted December 17, 2018 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted December 17, 2018 Just now, NaturallyAspirated said: Sure, I brought up the issues in that thread, and there was discussion after that about the allowance of those kids of things. As I recall the discussion delved into chais streching/breaking to prove the point. Neal I recall very clearly stating "all other variables constant except lug height." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted December 17, 2018 Share Posted December 17, 2018 Just now, Highmark said: I recall very clearly stating "all other variables constant except lug height." I meant my original post, replying in that thread, not your specific post, sorry, my mistake for being unclear. Neal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.