Snoslinger Posted December 12, 2018 Share Posted December 12, 2018 Just now, Rigid1 said: Why would they need to funnel it through the NRA?? Trump has a foundation, simple to make a donation to it..And it's obviously acceptable by your side, so no worries. .amirite?? Because it’s bigly money and trump’s charity is under investigation. This is much more sneaky. Are you not capable of thinking this stuff yourself? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted December 12, 2018 Share Posted December 12, 2018 The Clintons literally took Russian money Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted December 12, 2018 Share Posted December 12, 2018 2 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: If they were doing that, to his campaign and other gop members, would you have a problem with that? It’s a yes or no question dude Yes. But I also had a problem with country's paying Hillary's foundations for "favors". You didn't. Does hypocrisy come with a "feeling" of some sort? Tingly or scratchy or something? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1jkw Posted December 12, 2018 Share Posted December 12, 2018 3 minutes ago, Rigid1 said: Oh totally agree,..but a lot of money got donated to the "foundation",..Slick got paid big-time to speak,..and can't sell a ticket for $6.50 now, donations drop by what??? 70%?? To the "foundation" It's obvious pay to play And these fuckers are up in arms about an 8 year old business deal with Trump that never happened and no loot was exchanged?? It's just so childish and hackish,..exactly why I don't want anything to do with that party Why did all other agencies agree to the sale? They should not have taken the money, but if all other agencies approved the sale what did that money buy. Seems like there is more then an 8 year old deal going on here, wait till the investigation is over. As far as being childish and hackish goes, be hard pressed to be worse than the Republicans. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted December 12, 2018 Share Posted December 12, 2018 1 minute ago, Zambroski said: Yes. But I also had a problem with country's paying Hillary's foundations for "favors". You didn't. Does hypocrisy come with a "feeling" of some sort? Tingly or scratchy or something? Because I felt the favors were very “petty” and the donations made to the foundation were transparent. Do you have any evidence otherwise? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Rigid1 Posted December 12, 2018 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted December 12, 2018 4 minutes ago, 1jkw said: Why did all other agencies agree to the sale? They should not have taken the money, but if all other agencies approved the sale what did that money buy. Seems like there is more then an 8 year old deal going on here, wait till the investigation is over. As far as being childish and hackish goes, be hard pressed to be worse than the Republicans. I'm going to go out on a limb here with a totally wild off the wall guess, so here it is Ummmmm,...money?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carlos Danger Posted December 12, 2018 Share Posted December 12, 2018 1 minute ago, Snoslinger said: Because I felt the favors were very “petty” and the donations made to the foundation were transparent. Do you have any evidence otherwise? Have you read any of the wiki leaks podesta emails? Pretty clear what donors thought they were getting for donations to the Clinton foundation. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted December 12, 2018 Share Posted December 12, 2018 1 minute ago, Carlos Danger said: Have you read any of the wiki leaks podesta emails? Pretty clear what donors thought they were getting for donations to the Clinton foundation. Do tell Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carlos Danger Posted December 12, 2018 Share Posted December 12, 2018 2 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: Do tell So the answer is no got it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted December 12, 2018 Author Share Posted December 12, 2018 I see my thread topic went to Hillary again. Obama must not be the flavor of the month with the apes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted December 12, 2018 Share Posted December 12, 2018 20 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: Because I felt the favors were very “petty” and the donations made to the foundation were transparent. Do you have any evidence otherwise? What’s happened to the Clinton Foundation’s “donations” since she’s been voted out of DC? That’s a rhetorical question meant to show you the corruption of what she was doing under the gross protection of the Obama administration. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted December 12, 2018 Share Posted December 12, 2018 19 minutes ago, Carlos Danger said: So the answer is no got it. No, the answer was “do tell” . So why don’t you? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted December 13, 2018 Share Posted December 13, 2018 (edited) 9 minutes ago, Zambroski said: What’s happened to the Clinton Foundation’s “donations” since she’s been voted out of DC? That’s a rhetorical question meant to show you the corruption of what she was doing under the gross protection of the Obama administration. They have dropped, but still very high. In the hundreds of millions. In addition, a segment of it closed in 2016. In addition the revenues fluctuated wildly over the years. It is nowhere close to closing. Now, have some donations dropped because of her not being potus? Sure. Just like donations to a boss’s charity would drop if he moved on to another company. Not all donations are “string free”. Edited December 13, 2018 by Snoslinger Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted December 13, 2018 Share Posted December 13, 2018 Just now, Snoslinger said: They have dropped, but still very high. I’m the hundreds of millions. In addition, a segment of it closed in 2016. In addition the revenues fluctuated wildly over the years. It is nowhere close to closing. Now, have some donations dropped because of her not being potus? Sure. Just like donations to a boss’s charity would drop if he moved on to another company. Not all donations are “string free”. Well done. “Not all donations are string free.” -THAT IS WHAT YOU DECIDED WAS A GOOD ENDING TO THAT PROTECTIONAL GIBBERISH??????? Oh, wow. Thanks for playing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1jkw Posted December 13, 2018 Share Posted December 13, 2018 56 minutes ago, Rigid1 said: I'm going to go out on a limb here with a totally wild off the wall guess, so here it is Ummmmm,...money?? Or it was their job, and what heads of what agencies got money? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
revkevsdi Posted December 13, 2018 Share Posted December 13, 2018 7 hours ago, Rod Johnson said: Clinton signed off on selling uranium to the Russians and took millions in gratuity What a moron. Still believes that fake news. Trumpsters have begun wearing their stupidity like a badge of honour. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Rigid1 Posted December 13, 2018 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted December 13, 2018 24 minutes ago, 1jkw said: Or it was their job, and what heads of what agencies got money? I dont recall saying anywhere the heads of said agencies got money?? I do think the US guberment got some money, and the Hillary foundation, and Slick Willy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
revkevsdi Posted December 13, 2018 Share Posted December 13, 2018 1 hour ago, Mainecat said: I see my thread topic went to Hillary again. Obama must not be the flavor of the month with the apes. “But but but Hillary was accused of something almost as bad”. Poor dumbasses can’t tell the difference. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted December 13, 2018 Author Share Posted December 13, 2018 Just now, revkevsdi said: “But but but Hillary was accused of something almost as bad”. Poor dumbasses can’t tell the difference. Trumps charity wasn’t even licensed. Otherwise known as a money laundering scam. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
revkevsdi Posted December 13, 2018 Share Posted December 13, 2018 22 minutes ago, Mainecat said: Trumps charity wasn’t even licensed. Otherwise known as a money laundering scam. https://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=search.history&orgid=16764 Trump's charity is on the list as a high concern. But that is only because he's a crook https://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=search.summary&orgid=16680 The Clinton foundation is on the list as a low concern. But that is because they are legit. But none of that matters to Trumpsters because Trump ( who lies 70% of the time) called her crooked Hillary. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1jkw Posted December 13, 2018 Share Posted December 13, 2018 36 minutes ago, Rigid1 said: I dont recall saying anywhere the heads of said agencies got money?? I do think the US guberment got some money, and the Hillary foundation, and Slick Willy So again, why did all those agencies approve the sale if they weren't paid off? If all other agencies found no reason to stop the sale, why would Hillary. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Rigid1 Posted December 13, 2018 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted December 13, 2018 (edited) 11 minutes ago, 1jkw said: So again, why did all those agencies approve the sale if they weren't paid off? If all other agencies found no reason to stop the sale, why would Hillary. Lol,..ummm, maybe the thought selling it and getting the money from Russia to the US was a good deal for Murica.. especially since the uranium never had to leave.. Surley there is a possibility that Hillary was like no we are not doing it and then the pay outs came to the foundation and Slick and then she was like ok.. Or The pay outs came to the Hillary foundation and as SOS she used her influence to work over those agencies. Or The heads of those agencies are gone and retired in a nice upscale Russian community.. Honestly, I don't really give a shit she got money to sell the Russians uranium that they will actually never get..doesn't effect me at all. Everyone knows they are crooked as shit,..If I could get rich sell the Russians something they would never get I'd do it too..It be a shady as fuck deal too.. But I can at least call it out like it is..Shady as fuck Edited December 13, 2018 by Rigid1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1jkw Posted December 13, 2018 Share Posted December 13, 2018 1 hour ago, Rigid1 said: Lol,..ummm, maybe the thought selling it and getting the money from Russia to the US was a good deal for Murica.. especially since the uranium never had to leave.. Surley there is a possibility that Hillary was like no we are not doing it and then the pay outs came to the foundation and Slick and then she was like ok.. Or The pay outs came to the Hillary foundation and as SOS she used her influence to work over those agencies. Or The heads of those agencies are gone and retired in a nice upscale Russian community.. Honestly, I don't really give a shit she got money to sell the Russians uranium that they will actually never get..doesn't effect me at all. Everyone knows they are crooked as shit,..If I could get rich sell the Russians something they would never get I'd do it too..It be a shady as fuck deal too.. But I can at least call it out like it is..Shady as fuck It was owned by a Canadian company not the US. Think about how much smarter the Clintons are than everyone else in the whole world to get away with all the things people believe they did and they still walk around free. No person or persons in the history of the world have done what they have and got away with it all, shit Jesus only walked on water, he's got nothing on the Clintons. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted December 13, 2018 Share Posted December 13, 2018 2 hours ago, revkevsdi said: What a moron. Still believes that fake news. Trumpsters have begun wearing their stupidity like a badge of honour. Those are both facts I’m not sure why you’re so upset Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
revkevsdi Posted December 13, 2018 Share Posted December 13, 2018 47 minutes ago, Rod Johnson said: Those are both facts I’m not sure why you’re so upset trumpeter facts. Poor stupid Rod Johnson. You can pick up your stupid trophy anytime. All the Trumpsters get a trophy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.