NaturallyAspirated Posted December 12, 2018 Share Posted December 12, 2018 1 minute ago, 1jkw said: A Canadian company would still own it. And that is worse cause they have momo. Haha, good point. Neal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted December 12, 2018 Share Posted December 12, 2018 The the uranium one conspiracy still has more plausibility than collusion. Interesting Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted December 12, 2018 Share Posted December 12, 2018 Just now, Rod Johnson said: Idiotic yet you don’t possess the brain power to answer it wow Sure I do, she could have abstained. It would not have changed the path of the sale. Again, your question is pointless and idiotic, and shows that you lack understanding on the issue. Neal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted December 12, 2018 Share Posted December 12, 2018 12 minutes ago, NaturallyAspirated said: Sure I do, she could have abstained. It would not have changed the path of the sale. Again, your question is pointless and idiotic, and shows that you lack understanding on the issue. Neal So if she didn’t sign off, that would have hindered the sale. Interesting Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted December 12, 2018 Share Posted December 12, 2018 3 minutes ago, Rod Johnson said: So if she didn’t sign off, that would have hindered the sale. Interesting No, that's not what I said. CFIUS can only approve the sale, or begin investigation, for the first round of voting. Thus Clinton could have voted to approve, abstain, or vote to initiate statutory investigation. Her vote would not have hindered the sale, all others remaining the same. Neal 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted December 12, 2018 Share Posted December 12, 2018 3 minutes ago, NaturallyAspirated said: No, that's not what I said. CFIUS can only approve the sale, or begin investigation, for the first round of voting. Thus Clinton could have voted to approve, abstain, or vote to initiate statutory investigation. Her vote would not have hindered the sale, all others remaining the same. Neal That’s incorrect. Do some research Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted December 12, 2018 Author Share Posted December 12, 2018 44 minutes ago, NaturallyAspirated said: No, that's not what I said. CFIUS can only approve the sale, or begin investigation, for the first round of voting. Thus Clinton could have voted to approve, abstain, or vote to initiate statutory investigation. Her vote would not have hindered the sale, all others remaining the same. Neal Just let them be fuckin dumb Neal. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted December 12, 2018 Share Posted December 12, 2018 "but, but but hillary sold russia 20% of US uranium...." perfect example of why trying to debate sludgey is pointless Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted December 12, 2018 Share Posted December 12, 2018 Fucking "Salon" breaking this wide open!!!!!!!! They have fiction that even CNN doesn't want to play out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted December 12, 2018 Share Posted December 12, 2018 let's cut to the chase. if russia was funneling money thru the NRA, do the rwws have a problem with it? it's appearing as if "no" is the answer, along with the usual deflections. broski, you first.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Rigid1 Posted December 12, 2018 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted December 12, 2018 Is it me,..or something,.. Last week the you guys were all up in arms with collusion about Trump as a private citizen was going to make a business deal for a hotel that involved Vlad getting a penthouse suit worth millions. (I can't remember the dollar amount) but hotel was never built, no money changed hands, Vlad is still living large in the Kremlin.. And you guys think this is Russian collusion Hillary, by your VERY OWN ADMISSION sold Russia our uranium, that they never actually got so it's a fake deal right..cuz usually when you buy something you take possession of it.. Huge amounts of money changed hands, into their hands, huge speaking fees paid to their person( but current speaking engagements are currently on Groupon for $13 and BOGO) And this is not some shady deal??? I mean frigging really?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted December 12, 2018 Share Posted December 12, 2018 4 minutes ago, Rigid1 said: Is it me,..or something,.. Last week the you guys were all up in arms with collusion about Trump as a private citizen was going to make a business deal for a hotel that involved Vlad getting a penthouse suit worth millions. (I can't remember the dollar amount) but hotel was never built, no money changed hands, Vlad is still living large in the Kremlin.. And you guys think this is Russian collusion Hillary, by your VERY OWN ADMISSION sold Russia our uranium, that they never actually got so it's a fake deal right..cuz usually when you buy something you take possession of it.. Huge amounts of money changed hands, into their hands, huge speaking fees paid to their person( but current speaking engagements are currently on Groupon for $13 and BOGO) And this is not some shady deal??? I mean frigging really?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted December 12, 2018 Share Posted December 12, 2018 8 minutes ago, Rigid1 said: Is it me,..or something,.. Last week the you guys were all up in arms with collusion about Trump as a private citizen was going to make a business deal for a hotel that involved Vlad getting a penthouse suit worth millions. (I can't remember the dollar amount) but hotel was never built, no money changed hands, Vlad is still living large in the Kremlin.. And you guys think this is Russian collusion Hillary, by your VERY OWN ADMISSION sold Russia our uranium, that they never actually got so it's a fake deal right..cuz usually when you buy something you take possession of it.. Huge amounts of money changed hands, into their hands, huge speaking fees paid to their person( but current speaking engagements are currently on Groupon for $13 and BOGO) And this is not some shady deal??? I mean frigging really?? They don't know...just flailing around to the sound of the Dem propaganda loud speaker that plays in their heads. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Rigid1 Posted December 12, 2018 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted December 12, 2018 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted December 12, 2018 Share Posted December 12, 2018 13 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: let's cut to the chase. if russia was funneling money thru the NRA, do the rwws have a problem with it? it's appearing as if "no" is the answer, along with the usual deflections. broski, you first.... "Funneling money through the NRA..." To who? This as so absurd it's hard to even grasp. As if there wasn't a million other (BETTER) ways to do it. I hear foundations work really well...if the Potus and his admin have your back. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1jkw Posted December 12, 2018 Share Posted December 12, 2018 25 minutes ago, Rigid1 said: Is it me,..or something,.. Last week the you guys were all up in arms with collusion about Trump as a private citizen was going to make a business deal for a hotel that involved Vlad getting a penthouse suit worth millions. (I can't remember the dollar amount) but hotel was never built, no money changed hands, Vlad is still living large in the Kremlin.. And you guys think this is Russian collusion Hillary, by your VERY OWN ADMISSION sold Russia our uranium, that they never actually got so it's a fake deal right..cuz usually when you buy something you take possession of it.. Huge amounts of money changed hands, into their hands, huge speaking fees paid to their person( but current speaking engagements are currently on Groupon for $13 and BOGO) And this is not some shady deal??? I mean frigging really?? Hillary sucks, but it was not "our uranium" and she was far from the only agency needed to approve the sale. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted December 12, 2018 Share Posted December 12, 2018 20 minutes ago, Zambroski said: "Funneling money through the NRA..." To who? This as so absurd it's hard to even grasp. As if there wasn't a million other (BETTER) ways to do it. I hear foundations work really well...if the Potus and his admin have your back. To who? Lmfao. Maybe if you’d spend more time in the real world instead of drawing lame SR pics you wouldn’t be so clueless. Now how about answering the question..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted December 12, 2018 Share Posted December 12, 2018 Just now, Snoslinger said: To who? Lmfao. Maybe if you’d spend more time in the real world instead of drawing lame SR pics you wouldn’t be so clueless. Now how about answering the question..... You could have answered my question instead of doing vortexing instead. Stop trying to protect Tooly. It's beneath you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Rigid1 Posted December 12, 2018 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted December 12, 2018 7 minutes ago, 1jkw said: Hillary sucks, but it was not "our uranium" and she was far from the only agency needed to approve the sale. Oh totally agree,..but a lot of money got donated to the "foundation",..Slick got paid big-time to speak,..and can't sell a ticket for $6.50 now, donations drop by what??? 70%?? To the "foundation" It's obvious pay to play And these fuckers are up in arms about an 8 year old business deal with Trump that never happened and no loot was exchanged?? It's just so childish and hackish,..exactly why I don't want anything to do with that party Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted December 12, 2018 Share Posted December 12, 2018 7 minutes ago, Zambroski said: You could have answered my question instead of doing vortexing instead. Stop trying to protect Tooly. It's beneath you. I asked the question first.... this has nothing to do with SR. Now, about the question..... why are you scared to answer it anyway? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted December 12, 2018 Share Posted December 12, 2018 1 minute ago, Rigid1 said: Oh totally agree,..but a lot of money got donated to the "foundation",..Slick got paid big-time to speak,..and can't sell a ticket for $6.50 now, donations drop by what??? 70%?? To the "foundation" It's obvious pay to play And these fuckers are up in arms about an 8 year old business deal with Trump that never happened and no loot was exchanged?? It's just so childish and hackish,..exactly why I don't want anything to do with that party You make 0 sense as usual. You complain about people bringing up old news, then ignore the new news, while bringing up old news of your own. do you think before you post? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted December 12, 2018 Share Posted December 12, 2018 1 minute ago, Snoslinger said: I asked the question first.... this has nothing to do with SR. Now, about the question..... why are you scared to answer it anyway? Oh for Christ's sake! You are believing that Russia is funneling money throught the NRA to Trump? I don't know what question you can ask me that has that as any basis that I can answer at all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted December 12, 2018 Share Posted December 12, 2018 Just now, Zambroski said: Oh for Christ's sake! You are believing that Russia is funneling money throught the NRA to Trump? I don't know what question you can ask me that has that as any basis that I can answer at all. If they were doing that, to his campaign and other gop members, would you have a problem with that? It’s a yes or no question dude Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Rigid1 Posted December 12, 2018 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted December 12, 2018 13 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: To who? Lmfao. Maybe if you’d spend more time in the real world instead of drawing lame SR pics you wouldn’t be so clueless. Now how about answering the question..... Why would they need to funnel it through the NRA?? Trump has a foundation, simple to make a donation to it..And it's obviously acceptable by your side, so no worries. .amirite?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted December 12, 2018 Share Posted December 12, 2018 It’s obvious to me why you dont answer..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.