NaturallyAspirated Posted September 21, 2018 Share Posted September 21, 2018 6 minutes ago, AKIQPilot said: Slinger. Any reaponse to this? Some evidence far more substantial than what has been offered needs to be provided for sure. Neal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted September 21, 2018 Share Posted September 21, 2018 59 minutes ago, Highmark said: Just curious. At what level of govt should this preclude someone from serving? I mean reality is what came forward on Bill Clinton was MUCH more substantial than this. What has come forward on Keith Ellison is much more substantial than this. hmmmm, good question, but i'd say anyone that sets policies, or judges anyone, for sure. that would be quite a bit of people. what i read about ellison didn't seem all that bad. was it more than verbal? if so, he should be out. bill? he isnt in office nor running for the SC. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted September 21, 2018 Share Posted September 21, 2018 10 minutes ago, T1R9sledder said: He will ignore it. case #3,169 where you chime in, agreeing with the posse, well after the posse already comments. why do you never comment about things early on? i know why... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted September 21, 2018 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted September 21, 2018 1 minute ago, Snoslinger said: hmmmm, good question, but i'd say anyone that sets policies, or judges anyone, for sure. that would be quite a bit of people. what i read about ellison didn't seem all that bad. was it more than verbal? if so, he should be out. bill? he isnt in office nor running for the SC. Did you vote for him? These allegations were out on him long before he ran for POTUS. I mean if you've changed your mind on what's allowable for office so be it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T1R9sledder Posted September 21, 2018 Share Posted September 21, 2018 1 minute ago, Snoslinger said: case #3,169 where you chime in, agreeing with the posse, well after the posse already comments. why do you never comment about things early on? i know why... Please do tell I need a laugh today....my mother is in the hospital and my cat has cancer caused by an rabies injection. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted September 21, 2018 Share Posted September 21, 2018 5 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: hmmmm, good question, but i'd say anyone that sets policies, or judges anyone, for sure. that would be quite a bit of people. what i read about ellison didn't seem all that bad. was it more than verbal? if so, he should be out. bill? he isnt in office nor running for the SC. He beat his girlfriend up and chased her out of the house isn't bad? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T1R9sledder Posted September 21, 2018 Share Posted September 21, 2018 15 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: hmmmm, good question, but i'd say anyone that sets policies, or judges anyone, for sure. that would be quite a bit of people. what i read about ellison didn't seem all that bad. was it more than verbal? if so, he should be out. bill? he isnt in office nor running for the SC. I just saw this nugget. You better reread what what you read. SMH Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted September 21, 2018 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted September 21, 2018 30 minutes ago, NaturallyAspirated said: Some evidence far more substantial than what has been offered needs to be provided for sure. Neal This. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted September 21, 2018 Share Posted September 21, 2018 5 minutes ago, T1R9sledder said: I just saw this nugget. You better reread what what you read. SMH yup lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 21, 2018 Share Posted September 21, 2018 Why was a 15 year old girl at a drinking party? Oh, I know plenty of them do it, but isn't that almsot LOOKING for trouble? I know it does not justify her being assaulted, but really what did she expect? I have a right to free speech. If I go to Roxbury, Mass. and just mumble something about negros, will I make it out alive??? If I go into a biker bar in Laconia during bike week, and quietly say some bikers are gay, will I be OK? I mean REALLY!!! A 15 year old cute cunt, drinking at a house with teen-aged boys, is simply insane. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cold War Posted September 21, 2018 Share Posted September 21, 2018 What a joke. Here are my rules. He goes first so he cant defend himself against her phony accusations . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edmo Posted September 21, 2018 Share Posted September 21, 2018 1 minute ago, Cold War said: What a joke. Here are my rules. He goes first so he cant defend himself against her phony accusations . First they demand the fbi investigate and now this. What will they think of next. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cold War Posted September 21, 2018 Share Posted September 21, 2018 37 minutes ago, Edmo said: First they demand the fbi investigate and now this. What will they think of next. They are making fools of themselves. I don’t care how many ugly women. Storm government offices . It’s done. Had some. Woman on at lunch, who was screaming about why wouldn’t an innocent man welcome a FBI investigation. Who wouldn’t want that??? 😂 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oleroule Posted September 21, 2018 Share Posted September 21, 2018 maybe only those with as spotless a background as the dems are demanding be allowed to vote. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted September 21, 2018 Share Posted September 21, 2018 6 minutes ago, oleroule said: maybe only those with as spotless a background as the dems are demanding be allowed to vote. I could go for that. Also, on the G'ment dole? No vote for you!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
USA Contributing Member $poorsledder$ Posted September 21, 2018 USA Contributing Member Share Posted September 21, 2018 https://iotwreport.com/christine-fords-yearbook-was-scrubbed-off-the-internet-and-for-obvious-reasons/ I guess her HS year book gives a good story of her morality filled high school years. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted September 21, 2018 Share Posted September 21, 2018 One of her demands will be that she won’t be under oath 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted September 21, 2018 Share Posted September 21, 2018 Just now, Rod Johnson said: One of her demands will be that she won’t be under oath She's legit. I'm sure of it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted September 21, 2018 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted September 21, 2018 (edited) 8 minutes ago, Rod Johnson said: One of her demands will be that she won’t be under oath Honestly I have not heard that claim. I've heard only questions from committee members, Kavanaugh goes first and is not in the room when she testifies. My prediction the goal post will move soon. My wife keeps commenting on how weak this whole thing makes women look. She said if this did happen how could it affect her life for 35+ years. On top of that she says if you were strong and telling the truth wouldn't you want to look your accuser in the eye while testifying. She said she would. Edited September 21, 2018 by Highmark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted September 21, 2018 Share Posted September 21, 2018 1 minute ago, Highmark said: Honestly I have not heard that claim. I've heard only questions from committee members, Kavanaugh goes first and is not in the room when she testifies. Sounds like she has lots to hide Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edmo Posted September 21, 2018 Share Posted September 21, 2018 13 minutes ago, Highmark said: Honestly I have not heard that claim. I've heard only questions from committee members, Kavanaugh goes first and is not in the room when she testifies. My prediction the goal post will move soon. My wife keeps commenting on how weak this whole thing makes women look. She said if this did happen how could it affect her life for 35+ years. On top of that she says if you were strong and telling the truth wouldn't you want to look your accuser in the eye while testifying. She said she would. This. You want to turn the guys life upside down the least you could do is show up and do it face to face. Since when does the accuser get to make all the rules. Rediculous. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted September 21, 2018 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted September 21, 2018 1 minute ago, Edmo said: This. You want to turn the guys life upside down the least you could do is show up and do it face to face. Since when does the accuser get to make all the rules. Rediculous. Hard to buy someone's story when they can't look them in the eye and say "you did this to me." Truthful or not that would be powerful and probably end his nomination. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted September 21, 2018 Share Posted September 21, 2018 18 minutes ago, Highmark said: Honestly I have not heard that claim. I've heard only questions from committee members, Kavanaugh goes first and is not in the room when she testifies. My prediction the goal post will move soon. My wife keeps commenting on how weak this whole thing makes women look. She said if this did happen how could it affect her life for 35+ years. On top of that she says if you were strong and telling the truth wouldn't you want to look your accuser in the eye while testifying. She said she would. My wife's comments got a lot more colorful. Same though....this does not make women look stronger or help any equality causes. It's another "baggage item". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted September 21, 2018 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted September 21, 2018 Just now, Zambroski said: My wife's comments got a lot more colorful. Same though....this does not make women look stronger or help any equality causes. It's another "baggage item". Oh hers were too but I was keeping it short. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
motonoggin Posted September 21, 2018 Share Posted September 21, 2018 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.