Snoslinger Posted February 19, 2018 Share Posted February 19, 2018 3 minutes ago, NaturallyAspirated said: You have not won the bet, you are being a stubborn partisan hack. Neal i'm guessing you haven't even read some important parts of the thread. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AKIQPilot Posted February 19, 2018 Share Posted February 19, 2018 3 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: call it whatever you want OK. The answer is no. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AKIQPilot Posted February 19, 2018 Share Posted February 19, 2018 1 minute ago, Snoslinger said: i'm guessing you haven't even read some important parts of the thread. You mean the part where you agreed that Mueller would have the final say? That part? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
01mxz800 Posted February 19, 2018 Share Posted February 19, 2018 1 hour ago, Snoslinger said: well even if you want to believe that asinine theory, not at all. trump jr and others still met to try and get dirt on hillary. that's a double owned, you fucking dunce but what about shillary and the DNC paying a foreign operative to write a false report to try to fuck her opponent, lets overlook that right, you fucking baffoon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted February 19, 2018 Share Posted February 19, 2018 Just now, AKIQPilot said: You mean the part where you agreed that Mueller would have the final say? That part? Must have missed that part. Can you expound @Snoslinger ? Neal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted February 19, 2018 Share Posted February 19, 2018 5 minutes ago, AKIQPilot said: You mean the part where you agreed that Mueller would have the final say? That part? that was not the original bet and i accepted that much later, after it was obvious skidmark welcher was just that, a welcher. i really had no other options. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Rigid1 Posted February 19, 2018 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted February 19, 2018 Just now, Snoslinger said: the gop and the dnc both paid fusion one for some research on opponents, like they all. this proves nothing. I did hear about a Repug initially paying Fusion for research , but it seemed it was just kind of one time and nothing came up?? what do you think?? but I also have read a lot about how the DNC and actually Hillary's camp paying over a long time, making multiple payments, and trying to hide said payments through a 3rd party..what do you think?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted February 19, 2018 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted February 19, 2018 Slinger is confusing the broad based part of the bet of who participated in the "collusion" to an oversimplified claim of the collusion itself. When I agreed to the bet I agreed that it could involve anyone in the Trump campaign even low level people, however I did not say nor did Slinger claim that nothing needed to be exchanged...a quid pro quo so to speak. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted February 19, 2018 Share Posted February 19, 2018 5 minutes ago, NaturallyAspirated said: Must have missed that part. Can you expound @Snoslinger ? Neal well you can read back in this thread and read the original conditions of the bet, or you can continue to be a hack. your choice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted February 19, 2018 Share Posted February 19, 2018 12 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: no, even if that were true that does not mean it must be ignored is that something you learned at trump university as well? So the lawyer was working on behalf of fusion GPS? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted February 19, 2018 Share Posted February 19, 2018 5 minutes ago, Highmark said: Slinger is confusing the broad based part of the bet of who participated in the "collusion" to an oversimplified claim of the collusion itself. When I agreed to the bet I agreed that it could involve anyone in the Trump campaign even low level people, however I did not say nor did Slinger claim that nothing needed to be exchanged...a quid pro quo so to speak. i'm not confusing a damn thing. the conditions were plain and simple. you made the bet and welched. you even later admitted at that time you really thought nobody in the trump admin would do such a thing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted February 19, 2018 Share Posted February 19, 2018 4 minutes ago, Rod Johnson said: So the lawyer was working on behalf of fusion GPS? if the lawyer was doing, or had done some work for fusion one in another matter, that does not mean you can legally throw out all the evidence associated with fusion one in this matter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted February 19, 2018 Share Posted February 19, 2018 some of you clowns would make great lawyers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xtralettucetomatoe580 Posted February 19, 2018 Share Posted February 19, 2018 Just now, Snoslinger said: some of you clowns would make great lawyers You do realize you work off of conjecture nearly all the time... The irony of this post is through the roof. The fact you can’t see it, makes it all the funnier. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AKIQPilot Posted February 19, 2018 Share Posted February 19, 2018 11 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: that was not the original bet and i accepted that much later, after it was obvious skidmark welcher was just that, a welcher. i really had no other options. Exactly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted February 19, 2018 Share Posted February 19, 2018 5 minutes ago, xtralettucetomatoe580 said: You do realize you work off of conjecture nearly all the time... The irony of this post is through the roof. The fact you can’t see it, makes it all the funnier. conjecture? paleez? who is more correct in the two statements made by me or sludgey? why are you only calling me out for "conjecture"? the thread, and this place, is full of it. 3 minutes ago, AKIQPilot said: Exactly. yep. so i am not a welcher even under the new circumstances, am i? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AKIQPilot Posted February 19, 2018 Share Posted February 19, 2018 3 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: conjecture? paleez? who is more correct in the two statements made by me or sludgey? why are you only calling me out for "conjecture"? the thread, and this place, is full of it. yep. so i am not a welcher even under the new circumstances, am i? I didn't say you were. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xtralettucetomatoe580 Posted February 19, 2018 Share Posted February 19, 2018 3 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: conjecture? paleez? who is more correct in the two statements made by me or sludgey? why are you only calling me out for "conjecture"? the thread, and this place, is full of it. yep. so i am not a welcher even under the new circumstances, am i? Because you were trying to put down everyone else for what you are infamous for doing. You don’t like it, don’t say it. Your lack of awareness is astonishing. Some of us have proven we aren’t tied to a party. You, however, have never done that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted February 19, 2018 Author Share Posted February 19, 2018 Slingwelcher Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted February 19, 2018 Share Posted February 19, 2018 37 minutes ago, 01mxz800 said: but what about shillary and the DNC paying a foreign operative to write a false report to try to fuck her opponent, lets overlook that right, you fucking baffoon they were not writing a false report ya dingaling. jesus christ you are so gullible, but not alone. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted February 19, 2018 Share Posted February 19, 2018 3 minutes ago, f7ben said: Slingwelcher .7paypalliar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted February 19, 2018 Author Share Posted February 19, 2018 4 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: they were not writing a false report ya dingaling. jesus christ you are so gullible, but not alone. Ahh...yah. That's what the dossier was you fucking moron Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AKIQPilot Posted February 19, 2018 Share Posted February 19, 2018 1 minute ago, f7ben said: Ahh...yah. That's what the dossier was you fucking moron Just incredible isn't it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
01mxz800 Posted February 19, 2018 Share Posted February 19, 2018 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted February 19, 2018 Author Share Posted February 19, 2018 4 minutes ago, AKIQPilot said: Just incredible isn't it? He's incredibly dumb Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.