f7ben Posted February 19, 2018 Author Share Posted February 19, 2018 29 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: skidmark is the welcher, not me. fuck you ben. Nope.....zero collusion. Not even a whiff of it. Unless you count what Hillary did. You owe 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted February 19, 2018 Share Posted February 19, 2018 5 minutes ago, f7ben said: Nope.....zero collusion. Not even a whiff of it. Unless you count what Hillary did. You owe The was COLLUSION....it was the dems. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted February 19, 2018 Share Posted February 19, 2018 7 minutes ago, f7ben said: Nope.....zero collusion. Not even a whiff of it. Unless you count what Hillary did. You owe you're not even aware of what the bet was yet here you are running your piehole. personally i think your ass is chapped after all your conspiracies have once again, crashed to the ground in flames. it's become a regular pattern. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xtralettucetomatoe580 Posted February 19, 2018 Share Posted February 19, 2018 1 hour ago, Sleepr2 said: You must have a psychological problem with admitting you’re wrong , seek help. What psychological problem is involved with refusing to even say what the bet was about? Should be pretty easy right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted February 19, 2018 Author Share Posted February 19, 2018 5 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: you're not even aware of what the bet was yet here you are running your piehole. personally i think your ass is chapped after all your conspiracies have once again, crashed to the ground in flames. it's become a regular pattern. Nope....just calling out welchers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Jimmy Snacks Posted February 19, 2018 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted February 19, 2018 3 minutes ago, xtralettucetomatoe580 said: What psychological problem is involved with refusing to even say what the bet was about? Should be pretty easy right? I think Creeper is related to Prestone....straight up stupid. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted February 19, 2018 Share Posted February 19, 2018 4 minutes ago, f7ben said: Nope....just calling out welchers anyone who had an ounce on honesty and integrity and read the original bet, agreed i had won the bet. now fuck off. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted February 19, 2018 Share Posted February 19, 2018 6 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: anyone who had an ounce on honesty and integrity and read the original bet, agreed i had won the bet. now fuck off. How did you win if no collusion has been proven? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted February 19, 2018 Author Share Posted February 19, 2018 2 minutes ago, DAVE said: How did you win if no collusion has been proven? Because he has no clue still what collusion even means. The DNC conning idiot Don Jr into meeting with a "russian" fusion GPS lawyer is so far from collusion it's laughable. Retard Slinger should have to pay double 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted February 19, 2018 Share Posted February 19, 2018 7 minutes ago, DAVE said: How did you win if no collusion has been proven? the bet was not centered around an official collusion charge. i specifically said if evidence is found that trump or anyone in his admin met with russians to get dirt on hillary i win the bet. highmark, at the time, swore that did not happen. well it did happen, and the evidence came out, and i won the bet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted February 19, 2018 Share Posted February 19, 2018 1 minute ago, Snoslinger said: the bet was not centered around an official collusion charge. i specifically said if evidence is found that trump or anyone in his admin met with russians to get dirt on hillary i win the bet. highmark, at the time, swore that did not happen. well it did happen, and the evidence came out, and i won the bet. Sooooo doesn't the fact that your dems set up the meeting cancel that out? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted February 19, 2018 Author Share Posted February 19, 2018 Just now, DAVE said: Sooooo doesn't the fact that your dems set up the meeting cancel that out? And that no info was exchanged Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted February 19, 2018 Share Posted February 19, 2018 Just now, f7ben said: And that no info was exchanged Slinger is a typical shady dem. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted February 19, 2018 Share Posted February 19, 2018 4 minutes ago, DAVE said: Sooooo doesn't the fact that your dems set up the meeting cancel that out? well even if you want to believe that asinine theory, not at all. trump jr and others still met to try and get dirt on hillary. that's a double owned, you fucking dunce Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted February 19, 2018 Share Posted February 19, 2018 5 minutes ago, f7ben said: And that no info was exchanged 3 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: well even if you want to believe that asinine theory, not at all. trump jr and others still met to try and get dirt on hillary. that's a double owned, you fucking dunce Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted February 19, 2018 Author Share Posted February 19, 2018 Just now, Snoslinger said: well even if you want to believe that asinine theory, not at all. trump jr and others still met to try and get dirt on hillary. that's a double owned, you fucking dunce That is not collusion or anywhere near it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted February 19, 2018 Share Posted February 19, 2018 4 minutes ago, f7ben said: That is not collusion or anywhere near it can you fucking read? 9 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: the bet was not centered around an official collusion charge. i specifically said if evidence is found that trump or anyone in his admin met with russians to get dirt on hillary i win the bet. highmark, at the time, swore that did not happen. well it did happen, and the evidence came out, and i won the bet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted February 19, 2018 Share Posted February 19, 2018 2 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: well even if you want to believe that asinine theory, not at all. trump jr and others still met to try and get dirt on hillary. that's a double owned, you fucking dunce Speaking of assinine theory....hows the collusion thing going for you? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted February 19, 2018 Share Posted February 19, 2018 fucking clowns can't even win an argument even if your lame conspiracies were true ever consider law? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted February 19, 2018 Share Posted February 19, 2018 @Snoslinger can you not see this all about the fact that your girl lost the election and you just can't fathom that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted February 19, 2018 Share Posted February 19, 2018 (edited) 5 minutes ago, DAVE said: @Snoslinger can you not see this all about the fact that your girl lost the election and you just can't fathom that? i've wasted enough time with your nonsense on this bet issue, so i'm now about to waste any more on your deflections..... Edited February 19, 2018 by Snoslinger Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted February 19, 2018 Share Posted February 19, 2018 Just now, Snoslinger said: i've wasted enough time with your nonsense on this bet issue, so i'm now wating any more on your deflections..... Youve wasted more then a yr crying about losing.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted February 19, 2018 Share Posted February 19, 2018 poor ben, dave, and skidmark welcher... On 5/18/2017 at 10:03 AM, Highmark said: Cool. We need to define collusion a little bit first. An indictment must be filed against someone or do you suggest something else? On 5/18/2017 at 10:18 AM, Highmark said: Really? Collusion is simple....what's your definition? A talked to B.? On 5/18/2017 at 10:40 AM, Snoslinger said: I can see where highmark is headed with this bet already. had a similar bet been made about Russian involvement at all, he'd be running around "where's the proof? just because the fbi and 5800 other agencies say it's true doesn't mean it's true" pretty fucking simple really - if evidence is found that one of the mentioned people were caught working with the Russians to damage Hillary, and help trump, that is collusion. it can be a memo, a recording, a money trail, etc. so do we have a deal or not? broski, maybe you should stay the fuck out of this? On 5/18/2017 at 10:43 AM, Highmark said: I can accept that even though it still pretty broad. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted February 19, 2018 Share Posted February 19, 2018 now ben, remove my name in your first post and change it to highmark instead and thanks for bringing this to the attention of the forum again dumb ass Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted February 19, 2018 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted February 19, 2018 Just now, Snoslinger said: poor ben, dave, and skidmark welcher... Dude taking a meeting is not working with. I take meetings with salesman all the time, listen to them and then they leave. That is not working with them. pretty fucking simple really - if evidence is found that one of the mentioned people were caught working with the Russians to damage Hillary, and help trump, that is collusion. it can be a memo, a recording, a money trail, etc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.