Snake Posted July 12, 2017 Share Posted July 12, 2017 Just now, f7ben said: You wont get an answer to that and you know it I disagree, he argues facts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted July 12, 2017 Share Posted July 12, 2017 Just now, Snake said: I disagree, he argues facts. true .....usually daily Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted July 12, 2017 Share Posted July 12, 2017 1 minute ago, Snake said: Would you say, she was a foreign national working for the (hypothetical) betterment of the Trump campaign? I would say she was a Russian colluding with the trump campaign to pin dirt on Hillary and help trump win the election. after hearing lie after lie after lie after lie and "fake news" "fake news" "fake news" "fake news" from the trumps and and you simpletons for months. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted July 12, 2017 Share Posted July 12, 2017 3 minutes ago, f7ben said: You wont get an answer to that and you know it poor ben Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted July 12, 2017 Share Posted July 12, 2017 1 minute ago, Snoslinger said: I would say she was a Russian colluding with the trump campaign to pin dirt on Hillary and help trump win the election. after hearing lie after lie after lie after lie and "fake news" "fake news" "fake news" "fake news" from the trumps and and you simpletons for months. I would say that your assessment of the situation is less rooted in reality then pizzagate 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted July 12, 2017 Share Posted July 12, 2017 5 minutes ago, Snake said: Would you say, she was a foreign national working for the (hypothetical) betterment of the Trump campaign? 4 minutes ago, f7ben said: You wont get an answer to that and you know it 3 minutes ago, Snake said: I disagree, he argues facts. Just now, Snoslinger said: I would say she was a Russian colluding with the trump campaign to pin dirt on Hillary and help trump win the election. after hearing lie after lie after lie after lie and "fake news" "fake news" "fake news" "fake news" from the trumps and and you simpletons for months. Thanks for making a liar out of me. Answer it... it won't hurt. Was she was a foreign (citizen) national (can't get hung up on "GOVERNMENT, right?) working for the (hypothetical) betterment of the Trump campaign? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted July 12, 2017 Share Posted July 12, 2017 If you can't answer that straightforwardly, you lose. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted July 12, 2017 Share Posted July 12, 2017 53 minutes ago, f7ben said: I would say that your assessment of the situation is less rooted in reality then pizzagate no way you typed that with a straight face... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted July 12, 2017 Share Posted July 12, 2017 9 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: no way you typed that with a straight face... I dont type anything here with a straight face Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted July 12, 2017 Share Posted July 12, 2017 21 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: no way you typed that with a straight face... No way you didn't answer the question. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AKIQPilot Posted July 12, 2017 Share Posted July 12, 2017 1 hour ago, Snoslinger said: I would say she was a Russian colluding with the trump campaign to pin dirt on Hillary and help trump win the election. after hearing lie after lie after lie after lie and "fake news" "fake news" "fake news" "fake news" from the trumps and and you simpletons for months. Yet none of the bold actually happened. What ever happened to "wait for the investigation to be completed" ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted July 12, 2017 Share Posted July 12, 2017 3 minutes ago, AKIQPilot said: Yet none of the bold actually happened. What ever happened to "wait for the investigation to be completed" ? you don't know that... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AKIQPilot Posted July 12, 2017 Share Posted July 12, 2017 Just now, Snoslinger said: you don't know that... And neither do you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted July 12, 2017 Share Posted July 12, 2017 1 minute ago, AKIQPilot said: Yet none of the bold actually happened. What ever happened to "wait for the investigation to be completed" ? He's in a not answering questions he doesn't like mood. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted July 12, 2017 Share Posted July 12, 2017 4 minutes ago, AKIQPilot said: And neither do you. you're right. what i do know is that the two met with intent to collude against hillary, as proven by the content of the e-mails. that was what my bet was about. what would have been your and highmark's next argument? whether the data the russians had was legit? where they got it from? how it was given? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member SnowRider Posted July 12, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted July 12, 2017 (edited) 9 minutes ago, AKIQPilot said: Yet none of the bold actually happened. What ever happened to "wait for the investigation to be completed" ? We are waiting....and simply reporting the news as it unfolds. Still of the opinion there is nothing to Russia.?? Edited July 12, 2017 by SnowRider Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted July 12, 2017 Share Posted July 12, 2017 1 minute ago, Snoslinger said: you're right. what i do know is that the two met with intent to collude against hillary, as proven by the content of the e-mails. that was what my bet was about. what would have been your and highmark's next argument? whether the data the russians had was legit? where they got it from? how it was given? Who EXACTY is..... THE RUSSIANS? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepr2 Posted July 12, 2017 Share Posted July 12, 2017 (edited) 41 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: no way you typed that with a straight face... I thought the same thing when you try to blame the Obamacare fuckup on the Pubbies Edited July 12, 2017 by Sleepr2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member SnowRider Posted July 12, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted July 12, 2017 Just now, Snake said: Who EXACTY is..... THE RUSSIANS? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AKIQPilot Posted July 12, 2017 Share Posted July 12, 2017 3 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: you're right. what i do know is that the two met with intent to collude against hillary, as proven by the content of the e-mails. that was what my bet was about. what would have been your and highmark's next argument? whether the data the russians had was legit? where they got it from? how it was given? I don't remember "intent to collude" being included in the bet. I'm all for letting the investigation determine if there was collusion. You? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted July 12, 2017 Share Posted July 12, 2017 1 minute ago, AKIQPilot said: I don't remember "intent to collude" being included in the bet. I'm all for letting the investigation determine if there was collusion. You? DENIED!!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted July 12, 2017 Share Posted July 12, 2017 You know....I knew this was gonna get sideways when it was all going down. Too funny! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted July 12, 2017 Share Posted July 12, 2017 37 minutes ago, AKIQPilot said: I don't remember "intent to collude" being included in the bet. I'm all for letting the investigation determine if there was collusion. You? He literally just started saying that because that's what CNN changed the narrative to today what a dork INTENT to COLLUDE!!!!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted July 12, 2017 Share Posted July 12, 2017 "Intent to collude" you'd have to be a fucking moron to even type that Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted July 12, 2017 Share Posted July 12, 2017 Just now, f7ben said: "Intent to collude" you'd have to be a fucking moron to even type that I agree. How can it be attempted unless it was caught in the act before it happened? So stupid. Another "nothing burger"...hold the Russia. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.