AKIQPilot Posted July 13, 2017 Share Posted July 13, 2017 Just now, Snoslinger said: Where does that quote mention DNC? Keep making up shit as you go. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted July 13, 2017 Share Posted July 13, 2017 2 minutes ago, AKIQPilot said: Where does that quote mention DNC? Keep making up shit as you go. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AKIQPilot Posted July 13, 2017 Share Posted July 13, 2017 Just now, Snoslinger said: Exactly. You have nothing once again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted July 13, 2017 Share Posted July 13, 2017 tom i've asked you repeatedly to expalin your logic with this "plant" and you've failed to do so. maybe if you did, we could clear this little thing up? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted July 13, 2017 Share Posted July 13, 2017 3 minutes ago, AKIQPilot said: Exactly. You have nothing once again. wrong, i have a bunch of quotes from you that make absolute 0 sense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AKIQPilot Posted July 13, 2017 Share Posted July 13, 2017 Just now, Snoslinger said: wrong, i have a bunch of quotes from you that make absolute 0 sense. Yea. Exactly how the rest of us feel when we read your BS. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AKIQPilot Posted July 13, 2017 Share Posted July 13, 2017 2 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: tom i've asked you repeatedly to expalin your logic with this "plant" and you've failed to do so. maybe if you did, we could clear this little thing up? Once again. Three words. Anyone but Hillary. I don't give 1 fuck how we achieved that. I don't care if every one of donalds kids rots in jail. As long as I know Hillary will never be president it will all be worth it in the end. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted July 13, 2017 Share Posted July 13, 2017 3 minutes ago, AKIQPilot said: Yea. Exactly how the rest of us feel when we read your BS. i explained my thoughts on the matter very clearly. you? nothing but jibberish and deflections. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted July 13, 2017 Share Posted July 13, 2017 2 minutes ago, AKIQPilot said: Once again. Three words. Anyone but Hillary. I don't give 1 fuck how we achieved that. I don't care if every one of donalds kids rots in jail. As long as I know Hillary will never be president it will all be worth it in the end. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted July 13, 2017 Author Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted July 13, 2017 12 hours ago, AKIQPilot said: You may not realize this but the DNC and the Hillary Campaign are two different things. Wikileaks showed differently. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AKIQPilot Posted July 13, 2017 Share Posted July 13, 2017 2 minutes ago, Highmark said: Wikileaks showed differently. It was sarcasm.................. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted July 13, 2017 Author Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted July 13, 2017 8 minutes ago, AKIQPilot said: It was sarcasm.................. Sorry....i thought I was responding to Ice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted July 13, 2017 Share Posted July 13, 2017 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted July 13, 2017 Author Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted July 13, 2017 (edited) Reality is the parties do a tremendous amount of the groundwork in a campaign. Generally they are tied at the hip to the candidate once they are nominated. What's unusual and actually against party rules is for the party to favor a candidate during the primary process. This is why there is a fraud lawsuit currently ongoing against the DNC. No question they will lose or settle. The emails make it a slam dunk. http://www.newsweek.com/dnc-fraud-lawsuit-claims-bernie-sanders-would-have-won-rigged-election-hillary-611165 Edited July 13, 2017 by Highmark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted July 13, 2017 Author Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted July 13, 2017 (edited) 18 hours ago, Snoslinger said: I would say she was a Russian colluding with the trump campaign to pin dirt on Hillary and help trump win the election. after hearing lie after lie after lie after lie and "fake news" "fake news" "fake news" "fake news" from the trumps and and you simpletons for months. On 5/18/2017 at 11:13 AM, Highmark said: Collusion will be clear. Trump side: Release this Russians: Ok. OR Russians: We have this on Hillary. Trump Side: Give it to Wiki. 16 hours ago, AKIQPilot said: Yet none of the bold actually happened. What ever happened to "wait for the investigation to be completed" ? 16 hours ago, Snoslinger said: you don't know that... 16 hours ago, AKIQPilot said: And neither do you. 16 hours ago, Snoslinger said: you're right. what i do know is that the two met with intent to collude against hillary, as proven by the content of the e-mails. that was what my bet was about. what would have been your and highmark's next argument? whether the data the russians had was legit? where they got it from? how it was given? 16 hours ago, AKIQPilot said: I don't remember "intent to collude" being included in the bet. I'm all for letting the investigation determine if there was collusion. You? ^^^This^^^ If others agree the bet was on intent I have no problem with paying. I agreed that it could be any Russian not someone directly tied to the govt. I also agreed it could be anyone with ties to the Trump campaign. That's pretty broad but I agreed to it. I also stated that there needed to be action requested on the information, not just lets see what you have. This indicates actions taken. Snot did not disagree when I posted that. Edited July 13, 2017 by Highmark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted July 13, 2017 Share Posted July 13, 2017 about the only honest member of team trump said I won the bet, based on my terms of the bet. what should have been the obvious intent of the bet, the two parties meeting to discuss dirt on Hillary, you and others turned into something else. you, and many others, were absolutely positive that nobody from the trump team met with Russians to discuss Hillary dirt for the election, and you based your bet on that alone. deny it all you fucking want. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICEMAN! Posted July 13, 2017 Share Posted July 13, 2017 Just now, Snoslinger said: about the only honest member of team trump said I won the bet, based on my terms of the bet. what should have been the obvious intent of the bet, the two parties meeting to discuss dirt on Hillary, you and others turned into something else. you, and many others, were absolutely positive that nobody from the trump team met with Russians to discuss Hillary dirt for the election, and you based your bet on that alone. deny it all you fucking want. There were never any meetings. Many here swore up and down there weren't. There was no "there" there and it was all nothingburgers. This Trump Jr thing is just the tip of the iceberg. The coverup is still in full swing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted July 13, 2017 Share Posted July 13, 2017 Every supposition by the left is fact. Why didn't I think of that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted July 13, 2017 Share Posted July 13, 2017 2 minutes ago, ICEMAN! said: There were never any meetings. Many here swore up and down there weren't. There was no "there" there and it was all nothingburgers. This Trump Jr thing is just the tip of the iceberg. The coverup is still in full swing. This Jr meeting is nothing..the lawyer is no Russian operative and slinger didnt win shit with his idiotic bet Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICEMAN! Posted July 13, 2017 Share Posted July 13, 2017 Just now, f7ben said: This Jr meeting is nothing..the lawyer is no Russian operative and slinger didnt win shit with his idiotic bet We'll see Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted July 13, 2017 Author Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted July 13, 2017 (edited) 8 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: about the only honest member of team trump said I won the bet, based on my terms of the bet. what should have been the obvious intent of the bet, the two parties meeting to discuss dirt on Hillary, you and others turned into something else. you, and many others, were absolutely positive that nobody from the trump team met with Russians to discuss Hillary dirt for the election, and you based your bet on that alone. deny it all you fucking want. I'll tell you what. I'll pay if you admit the meeting alone is not collusion. You then pay if Mueller says no collusion. Satisfies how we both looked at it. Edited July 13, 2017 by Highmark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted July 13, 2017 Share Posted July 13, 2017 3 minutes ago, ICEMAN! said: There were never any meetings. Many here swore up and down there weren't. There was no "there" there and it was all nothingburgers. This Trump Jr thing is just the tip of the iceberg. The coverup is still in full swing. if I had the time (take weeks likely) and interest I'd put together a thread of all the Russian denials from these clowns. starting with "where's the proof that russia meddled in our election". how many pages? 500? vs their 2 about Hillary winning the election Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICEMAN! Posted July 13, 2017 Share Posted July 13, 2017 2 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: if I had the time (take weeks likely) and interest I'd put together a thread of all the Russian denials from these clowns. starting with "where's the proof that russia meddled in our election". how many pages? 500? vs their 2 about Hillary winning the election See my "Everything old is new again" thread Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted July 13, 2017 Share Posted July 13, 2017 Intent to collude from Jr the retard is no win on that bet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted July 13, 2017 Share Posted July 13, 2017 4 minutes ago, ICEMAN! said: See my "Everything old is new again" thread Really..? Obama and company did EVERYTHING possible to suck Russian dick. RIGHT till they flop in an election. Irony huh? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.