Snoslinger Posted July 12, 2017 Share Posted July 12, 2017 2 minutes ago, Highmark said: Again, present the post that says even remotely only a meeting had to occur. fuck off, welcher. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted July 12, 2017 Share Posted July 12, 2017 Just now, Snoslinger said: just when I thought you couldn't dig any deeper in the stupid hole, snakey comes back with a debate about election swaying. Politico‘s Kenneth Vogel and David Stern reported in early January that the DNC contacted officials from the Ukrainian government for their own oppo research efforts. These contacts did not involve cut-outs, as Veselnitskaya may or may not have been, but did directly assist in searching for damaging information that could be used in the election. http://theweek.com/articles/711169/there-still-no-actual-evidence-trumprussia-collusion Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted July 12, 2017 Share Posted July 12, 2017 one more time. for the welcher. " if evidence is found that one of the mentioned people were caught working with the Russians to damage Hillary, and help trump, that is collusion. it can be a memo, a recording, a money trail, etc. " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted July 12, 2017 Share Posted July 12, 2017 1 minute ago, Snoslinger said: one more time. for the welcher. " if evidence is found that one of the mentioned people were caught working with the Russians to damage Hillary, and help trump, that is collusion. it can be a memo, a recording, a money trail, etc. " What is her title in the Russian government? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted July 12, 2017 Share Posted July 12, 2017 Just now, Snake said: What is her title in the Russian government? ask the authors of the emails Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted July 12, 2017 Share Posted July 12, 2017 (edited) besides, "gov" wasn't included in the bet, for good reason. pay attention. I knew highmark would try to use that as another excuse for welching. "well technically, the Russian hacker didn't get a paycheck signed by putin, so is he really Russian gov?" Edited July 12, 2017 by Snoslinger Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted July 12, 2017 Author Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted July 12, 2017 1 minute ago, Snoslinger said: fuck off, welcher. You're a sore loser just like your gal Hillary. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted July 12, 2017 Share Posted July 12, 2017 1 minute ago, Highmark said: You're a sore loser just like your gal Hillary. look in the fucking mirror, bud Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted July 12, 2017 Author Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted July 12, 2017 6 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: one more time. for the welcher. " if evidence is found that one of the mentioned people were caught working with the Russians to damage Hillary, and help trump, that is collusion. it can be a memo, a recording, a money trail, etc. " Dude the phrase "working with" implies something gets accomplished. Did anything happen in the meetings to "DAMAGE HILLARY AND HELP TRUMP?" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted July 12, 2017 Share Posted July 12, 2017 if you were had any sense, you'd have noticed rww snake so much as admitted you lost the bet because the of the wording in the bet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICEMAN! Posted July 12, 2017 Share Posted July 12, 2017 Just now, Highmark said: Dude the phrase "working with" implies something gets accomplished. Did anything happen in the meetings to "DAMAGE HILLARY AND HELP TRUMP?" That's what Mueller is going to find out Keep pulling that string Robert... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted July 12, 2017 Share Posted July 12, 2017 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Highmark said: Dude the phrase "working with" implies something gets accomplished. Did anything happen in the meetings to "DAMAGE HILLARY AND HELP TRUMP?" oh bullshit. you're grabbing at straws big time. you agreed to that specific wording, welcher. Edited July 12, 2017 by Snoslinger Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICEMAN! Posted July 12, 2017 Share Posted July 12, 2017 Just now, Snoslinger said: :kmao: oh bullshit. you're grabbing at straws big time. you agreed to that specific wording, welcher. Is that the actual wording of the bet you guys made? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted July 12, 2017 Share Posted July 12, 2017 if I worked with iceman to make you a smart man skidmark, and it obviously couldn't happen, does that mean I didn't work with iceman!? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted July 12, 2017 Share Posted July 12, 2017 1 minute ago, ICEMAN! said: Is that the actual wording of the bet you guys made? absolutely, and he accepted the bet right after. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted July 12, 2017 Author Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted July 12, 2017 Just now, Snoslinger said: :kmao: oh bullshit. you're grabbing at straws big time. you agreed to that specific wording, welcher. Poor Snot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted July 12, 2017 Author Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted July 12, 2017 3 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: if you were had any sense, you'd have noticed rww snake so much as admitted you lost the bet because the of the wording in the bet. Really? Where? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICEMAN! Posted July 12, 2017 Share Posted July 12, 2017 Just now, Snoslinger said: absolutely, and he accepted the bet right after. Pay up Skidwelch Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted July 12, 2017 Share Posted July 12, 2017 On 5/18/2017 at 10:40 AM, Snoslinger said: I can see where highmark is headed with this bet already. had a similar bet been made about Russian involvement at all, he'd be running around "where's the proof? just because the fbi and 5800 other agencies say it's true doesn't mean it's true" pretty fucking simple really - if evidence is found that one of the mentioned people were caught working with the Russians to damage Hillary, and help trump, that is collusion. it can be a memo, a recording, a money trail, etc. so do we have a deal or not? broski, maybe you should stay the fuck out of this? On 5/18/2017 at 10:43 AM, Highmark said: I can accept that even though it still pretty broad. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted July 12, 2017 Share Posted July 12, 2017 Just now, Highmark said: Really? Where? in another thread... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted July 12, 2017 Author Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted July 12, 2017 Just now, ICEMAN! said: Pay up Skidwelch Oh man you got me there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted July 12, 2017 Share Posted July 12, 2017 4 minutes ago, Highmark said: Dude the phrase "working with" implies something gets accomplished. Did anything happen in the meetings to "DAMAGE HILLARY AND HELP TRUMP?" I assume "the Russians" meant an actual agent of the Kremlin? Cuz...otherwise, you may be fucked. Or really...for Snot's purposes: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted July 12, 2017 Share Posted July 12, 2017 So now some DNC planted lawyer with a russian sounding name gets to count as "THE RUSSIANS" .....I've fucking heard it all now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted July 12, 2017 Share Posted July 12, 2017 7 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: if you were had any sense, you'd have noticed rww snake so much as admitted you lost the bet because the of the wording in the bet. Would you say, she was a foreign national working for the (hypothetical) betterment of the Trump campaign? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted July 12, 2017 Share Posted July 12, 2017 Just now, Snake said: Would you say, she was a foreign national working for the (hypothetical) betterment of the Trump campaign? You wont get an answer to that and you know it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.