ActionfigureJoe Posted September 12 Share Posted September 12 37 minutes ago, Deephaven said: Need to track 3 year olds too in case their parents want to abort them. Tracking implants for everyone!! Just think of all the problems MAGA complains about that could be solved!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toslow Posted September 12 Share Posted September 12 (edited) 3 minutes ago, ActionfigureJoe said: Tracking implants for everyone!! Just think of all the problems MAGA complains about that could be solved!!! dude you got to be one of the dumbest mf'ers i've ever seen on a forum of any kind Edited September 12 by toslow Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ActionfigureJoe Posted September 12 Share Posted September 12 8 minutes ago, toslow said: dude you got to be one of the dumbest mf'ers i've ever seen on a forum of any kind Ok? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Steve753 Posted September 12 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted September 12 16 minutes ago, toslow said: dude you got to be one of the dumbest mf'ers i've ever seen on a forum of any kind Look in the mirror. You'll see another one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toslow Posted September 12 Share Posted September 12 5 minutes ago, Steve753 said: Look in the mirror. You'll see another one. I'll say this in terms you'll understand. I know you are so what am i.....lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Posted September 12 Share Posted September 12 That procedure is basically an inducement of labor. Why the fuck do they bother murdering the baby if they're just going to induce the mother at a point where the child is viable and likely to survive without any issues? Why not give the kid up for adoption at that point? Please, someone on the left, explain why this is acceptable. @SnowRider @Mainecat anyone? Seriously, I'm not calling you guys out to be a dick. I'm wondering how this is acceptable, in any party platform. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plissken Posted September 12 Share Posted September 12 2 hours ago, Matt said: That procedure is basically an inducement of labor. Why the fuck do they bother murdering the baby if they're just going to induce the mother at a point where the child is viable and likely to survive without any issues? Why not give the kid up for adoption at that point? Please, someone on the left, explain why this is acceptable. @SnowRider @Mainecat anyone? Seriously, I'm not calling you guys out to be a dick. I'm wondering how this is acceptable, in any party platform. There’s no sense setting up an adoption for a baby that won’t survive more than a few days after birth at best. Structural fetal anomalies, however, are often detected much later in pregnancy. As part of routine care, a fetal anatomy scan is performed around 20 weeks, which entails ultrasound imaging of all the developing organs. Many structural anomalies are discovered at this time that would not have been apparent previously. A proportion of these are lethal fetal anomalies, meaning that the fetus will almost certainly die before or shortly after birth, meaning the fetus may be nonviable (consensus does not always exist as to which anomalies are fatal, and thus nonviable). In these cases, many individuals wish to terminate their pregnancies, rather than risk carrying the pregnancy until the fetus or newborn passes away. Very often these pregnancies are desired, making this decision exceedingly difficult for parents. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member SnowRider Posted September 12 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted September 12 5 hours ago, Matt said: That procedure is basically an inducement of labor. Why the fuck do they bother murdering the baby if they're just going to induce the mother at a point where the child is viable and likely to survive without any issues? Why not give the kid up for adoption at that point? Please, someone on the left, explain why this is acceptable. @SnowRider @Mainecat anyone? Seriously, I'm not calling you guys out to be a dick. I'm wondering how this is acceptable, in any party platform. 3 hours ago, Plissken said: There’s no sense setting up an adoption for a baby that won’t survive more than a few days after birth at best. Structural fetal anomalies, however, are often detected much later in pregnancy. As part of routine care, a fetal anatomy scan is performed around 20 weeks, which entails ultrasound imaging of all the developing organs. Many structural anomalies are discovered at this time that would not have been apparent previously. A proportion of these are lethal fetal anomalies, meaning that the fetus will almost certainly die before or shortly after birth, meaning the fetus may be nonviable (consensus does not always exist as to which anomalies are fatal, and thus nonviable). In these cases, many individuals wish to terminate their pregnancies, rather than risk carrying the pregnancy until the fetus or newborn passes away. Very often these pregnancies are desired, making this decision exceedingly difficult for parents. I trust women and medical experts not right wing propaganda. Do you think women - who’ve been pregnant for months just wake up and say - fuck it - I’m getting an abortion? It’s none of my business. It’s none of your business. Thanks for the post @Plissken Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gold Member Kivalo Posted September 12 Gold Member Share Posted September 12 11 hours ago, Skidooski said: Got anything to back that up? His pants full of shit, does that count as proof? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Skidooski Posted September 12 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted September 12 41 minutes ago, Kivalo said: His pants full of shit, does that count as proof? That's just proof he still is alive. Another day in the life of MC Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crnr2Crnr Posted September 12 Share Posted September 12 8 hours ago, ActionfigureJoe said: Tracking implants for everyone!! Just think of all the problems MAGA complains about that could be solved!!! is this the same crowd that thought there were 5G microchips in the COVID vaccines? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jerry 976 Posted September 12 Share Posted September 12 23 minutes ago, Crnr2Crnr said: is this the same crowd that thought there were 5G microchips in the COVID vaccines? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.