f7ben Posted March 7 Author Share Posted March 7 1 minute ago, NaturallyAspirated said: Neal What your point. Of course the systems are similar. It is their utilization that defines their designation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 Just now, f7ben said: What your point. Of course the systems are similar. It is their utilization that defines their designation. Utilization of piston changes for compression ratio! Stop whining so much, Jesus. Neal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted March 7 Author Share Posted March 7 4 minutes ago, NaturallyAspirated said: Utilization of piston changes for compression ratio! Stop whining so much, Jesus. Neal I was correct , HSR was incorrect. You are a cunt and babbling away like normal with no significant contribution to the argument. BUT I SAID 920 millibars derrrdddd 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
airflite1 Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 10 minutes ago, f7ben said: Wait ….so turbocharging and turbo normalizing are different things? In sales terms yes, a turbo-normalized engine is a turbo-charged engine limited to 30 inches of manifold pressure, any thing boosted over 30 inches of manifold pressure is no longer considered turbo normalized. So if Doo, (all components the same), increases boost over 30 inches of MP it would no longer be considers turbo-normalized. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crnr2Crnr Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 33 minutes ago, f7ben said: I was correct , HSR was incorrect. You are a cunt and babbling away like normal with no significant contribution to the argument. BUT I SAID 920 millibars derrrdddd Your wet brain faggot ass doesn’t understand the most basic of concepts. Jesus Christ you are dripper level retarded. “But it’s turbo-normalizing!!!!!” Fuckin faggot. Neal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted March 7 Author Share Posted March 7 33 minutes ago, airflite1 said: In sales terms yes, a turbo-normalized engine is a turbo-charged engine limited to 30 inches of manifold pressure, any thing boosted over 30 inches of manifold pressure is no longer considered turbo normalized. So if Doo, (all components the same), increases boost over 30 inches of MP it would no longer be considers turbo-normalized. Exactly Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted March 7 Author Share Posted March 7 Just now, NaturallyAspirated said: Your wet brain faggot ass doesn’t understand the most basic of concepts. Jesus Christ you are dripper level retarded. “But it’s turbo-normalizing!!!!!” Fuckin faggot. Neal Poor Neal , just repeatedly bludgeoned everywhere he goes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 35 minutes ago, airflite1 said: In sales terms yes, a turbo-normalized engine is a turbo-charged engine limited to 30 inches of manifold pressure, any thing boosted over 30 inches of manifold pressure is no longer considered turbo normalized. So if Doo, (all components the same), increases boost over 30 inches of MP it would no longer be considers turbo-normalized. @f7ben owned! What a fucking moron. Neal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 Just now, f7ben said: Poor Neal , just repeatedly bludgeoned everywhere he goes That’s u idiot! Neal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted March 7 Author Share Posted March 7 Just now, NaturallyAspirated said: That’s u idiot! Neal I SAID UR A CUNT!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 Just now, f7ben said: I SAID UR A CUNT!!!! 10x better than what the fuck you are! Neal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted March 7 Author Share Posted March 7 3 minutes ago, NaturallyAspirated said: 10x better than what the fuck you are! Neal UR a Hairy OT style cunt!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 43 minutes ago, airflite1 said: a turbo-normalized engine is a turbo-charged engine limited to 30 inches of manifold pressure, 9 minutes ago, f7ben said: Exactly Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 3 minutes ago, f7ben said: UR a Hairy OT style cunt!!!! Least I have hair you bird-beaked, starfish-faced noodle arm!!111!!! Neal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted March 7 Author Share Posted March 7 4 minutes ago, NaturallyAspirated said: Least I have hair you bird-beaked, starfish-faced noodle arm!!111!!! Neal That’s not nice Neal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted March 7 Author Share Posted March 7 Skidoo released a turbonormalized engine the first year , the following year it could be considered turbo charged and it actually increased rated engine power. There are a few real fucking idiots here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted March 8 Share Posted March 8 21 minutes ago, f7ben said: That’s not nice Neal Sorry. Neal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
awful knawful Posted March 8 Share Posted March 8 20 minutes ago, f7ben said: Skidoo released a turbonormalized engine the first year , the following year it could be considered turbo charged and it actually increased rated engine power. There are a few real fucking idiots here. Yes, you for one, and anyone that agrees with you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted March 8 Author Share Posted March 8 30 minutes ago, awful knawful said: Yes, you for one, and anyone that agrees with you. I’d imagine that is the way you would see things and I’m not disappointed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted March 8 Share Posted March 8 The original argument was that doo invented a turbo to make no more hp they did 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
awful knawful Posted March 8 Share Posted March 8 12 hours ago, f7ben said: I’d imagine that is the way you would see things and I’m not disappointed 47 minutes ago, Rod said: The original argument was that doo invented a turbo to make no more hp they did DUMB & DUMBER Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ActionfigureJoe Posted March 8 Share Posted March 8 It still comes down to basic principle of more oxygen means more fuel which gets more power. Period. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted March 8 Share Posted March 8 1 hour ago, ActionfigureJoe said: It still comes down to basic principle of more oxygen means more fuel which gets more power. Period. Absolutely. Neal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 8 Share Posted March 8 1 hour ago, ActionfigureJoe said: It still comes down to basic principle of more oxygen means more fuel which gets more power. Period. 27 minutes ago, NaturallyAspirated said: Absolutely. Neal Trying to explain it to Ben Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.