Snake Posted July 7, 2016 Share Posted July 7, 2016 2 hours ago, Anler said: There were 3 other GT-r's on that sheet just below the Camaro... So? Welcome to years ago. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted July 7, 2016 Author Share Posted July 7, 2016 2 hours ago, Snake said: 7:08? I think not. 13th is the best Chevy can muster. 7:32 for the Ford. The Nissan was modified however. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anler Posted July 7, 2016 Share Posted July 7, 2016 26 minutes ago, Snake said: So? Welcome to years ago. It's all "years ago" look at the dates. Only the Camaro is recent. And gt350 is a joke... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ebsell Posted July 7, 2016 Share Posted July 7, 2016 (edited) 12 minutes ago, Anler said: It's all "years ago" look at the dates. Only the Camaro is recent. And gt350 is a joke... So the latest and greatest Camaro beat a bunch of antiques Edited July 7, 2016 by Ebsell Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted July 7, 2016 Share Posted July 7, 2016 11 minutes ago, Ebsell said: So the latest and greatest Camaro beat a bunch of antiques barely Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Skidooski Posted July 8, 2016 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted July 8, 2016 3 hours ago, f7ben said: nostalgia doesnt cut it when you want to go fast....awd is clearly a massive advantage No shit and who doesn't understand this? Chevy has a good run in a RWD car and all the Ford bois can do is point to the GTR. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anler Posted July 8, 2016 Share Posted July 8, 2016 8 minutes ago, Skidooski said: No shit and who doesn't understand this? Chevy has a good run in a RWD car and all the Ford bois can do is point to the GTR. I'll give the GTR credit as it is not a several hundred thousand dollar car like the European or hand built supercars. But... Camaro ftw... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted July 8, 2016 Share Posted July 8, 2016 1 hour ago, Sludgey said: The Nissan was modified however. Educate me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gold Member BOHICA Posted July 8, 2016 Gold Member Share Posted July 8, 2016 (edited) You have to understand how wikipedia works. User edited. For example this is the individual that added wikipedia times for example also likes to edit Caytlyn Jenners wiki page. Also determined that a Porsche Cayman is really a 719...... All the while their is no such thing as a 719 on porsches webpage. This individuals wiki edits/additions can be found here over the years https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Brayden.Dean You can also see his hobbies and interest her. He is fond of rare pepes. He is also part of the android master race, linux master race and master pc race...... What the fuck over... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Brayden.Dean Don't understand any of that but you can go check out their reddit page.... His user name is in above link for reddit. They are quite the gamer/computer user. My guess is he hit that speed in a camaro on Forenza or some other game on playstation with a camaro and posted it to wiki.... Gm owners with their intelligence level saw this time and took it as real....... Those gm owners got owned by a kid with a computer and vid game as well as wiki edit privileges as they took his time he posted and ran with it to every web forum like it was the holy grail..... Funny as fuck how those GM owners got fucking duped bad!!! Funny as fuck!!!! LOL!!!!! Edited July 8, 2016 by BOHICA 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Momorider Posted July 8, 2016 Share Posted July 8, 2016 How are Radicals considered street cars Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mileage Psycho Posted July 8, 2016 Share Posted July 8, 2016 Pushrods for simplicity, durability, dependability, and a low CG, it is what it is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FrankieJames7 Posted July 8, 2016 Share Posted July 8, 2016 (edited) 15 hours ago, f7ben said: wow ....only about half a fort night slower than a 9 year old GTR platform ....congrats gm faggots You can't help but notice how much of a complete fucking retard this guy is Edited July 8, 2016 by GreatLandEmpire 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted July 8, 2016 Share Posted July 8, 2016 7 hours ago, Mileage Psycho said: Pushrods for simplicity, durability, dependability, and a low CG, it is what it is....... SLOWER. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted July 8, 2016 Author Share Posted July 8, 2016 8 hours ago, Mileage Psycho said: Pushrods for simplicity, durability, dependability, and a low CG, it is what it is. Hp\L is a completely meaningless metric. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SmeeAgain Posted July 8, 2016 Share Posted July 8, 2016 34 minutes ago, Sludgey said: Hp\L is a completely meaningless metric. I really don't understand this hate for any type of engine design. An engine is simply a air pump. The more air you can get through it the more fuel you can put it and then the more HP you can make. You can do it with displacement, RPMs, or force feed it. EVERY way has its own advantages and disadvantages - no single design is the best for every application. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted July 8, 2016 Author Share Posted July 8, 2016 5 minutes ago, SmeeAgain said: I really don't understand this hate for any type of engine design. An engine is simply a air pump. The more air you can get through it the more fuel you can put it and then the more HP you can make. You can do it with displacement, RPMs, or force feed it. EVERY way has its own advantages and disadvantages - no single design is the best for every application. Yup. look at the gt350. The engine is actually quite cool. They pumped a pile of hp\L out of it and it revs awesome. but for 526 hp, it's quite slow. No quicker than a base SS with 455 hp. The engine is just way to lazy down low. Of course theirs work around a for that but it's fuel economy rating is already very poor Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FrankieJames7 Posted July 9, 2016 Share Posted July 9, 2016 10 hours ago, Sludgey said: Yup. look at the gt350. The engine is actually quite cool. They pumped a pile of hp\L out of it and it revs awesome. but for 526 hp, it's quite slow. No quicker than a base SS with 455 hp. The engine is just way to lazy down low. Of course theirs work around a for that but it's fuel economy rating is already very poor Other than a 2 stroke, single cam engine are the best overall powerplant. It is smaller than DOHC and weighs less, but the displacement is bigger but that only matters to ricers. For the physical size nothing beats it and if you need more power you can literally just make the engine bigger Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gold Member BOHICA Posted July 13, 2016 Gold Member Share Posted July 13, 2016 On July 7, 2016 at 5:57 AM, Sludgey said: http://www.camaronews.com/6thgen-camaro/2017-camaro-zl1-runs-723-nurburgring-time/ is this even possible, my Ford brothers? That would mean it absolutely hulk smashes the gt350 but with way less hp\L.... *feeling confused* You don't have to feel confused anymore ford brother!!!! The time put down by the ZL1 by a gamer on his video game doesn't qualify on the list and has been removed. Gm people are just kind of really a stupid version of an intelligent human being so much so that they believe in a gamers world that those times relate to reality. We superior ford brothers can't make fun of them to much though as #GMmoronslivesmatter what a bunch of fucking morons for believing that time though. Comical as the last camaro that ran the ring couldn't even make it all the way around without crashing. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Nürburgring_Nordschleife_lap_times Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted July 13, 2016 Author Share Posted July 13, 2016 Anyone else notice that the c6z came out in 2006 and ran a 7.22? How come Ford has nothing close? That car came out a decade ago. Do we need more hp\L? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gold Member BOHICA Posted July 13, 2016 Gold Member Share Posted July 13, 2016 11 minutes ago, Sludgey said: Anyone else notice that the c6z came out in 2006 and ran a 7.22? How come Ford has nothing close? That car came out a decade ago. Do we need more hp\L? No. Jamal explains it here..... http://www.autoevolution.com/news/ford-doesnt-care-about-nurburgring-lap-times-its-just-marketing-71987.html They test for the consumer their as its a great place to test production car but aren't into the factory backed effort 1 off cars and tunes to produce times. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted July 13, 2016 Author Share Posted July 13, 2016 4 minutes ago, BOHICA said: No. Jamal explains it here..... http://www.autoevolution.com/news/ford-doesnt-care-about-nurburgring-lap-times-its-just-marketing-71987.html They test for the consumer their as its a great place to test production car but aren't into the factory backed effort 1 off cars and tunes to produce times. I always wondered why the gt350 was so slow. Turns out just cause it is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capt.Storm Posted July 13, 2016 Share Posted July 13, 2016 3 minutes ago, Sludgey said: I always wondered why the gt350 was so slow. Turns out just cause it is. Man you like to get jerked off Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gold Member BOHICA Posted July 13, 2016 Gold Member Share Posted July 13, 2016 9 minutes ago, Sludgey said: I always wondered why the gt350 was so slow. Turns out just cause it is. No official professional time with vid proof has been put down by ford on any of their cars. The spectator timed lazy run, non competing time of the GT 350 is faster then any camaro time put down by GM when they closed the track and hauled their 1 off camaros to test on a closed track. Ford run there with everything else on the track on open track day just to test vehicle dynamics and not put down competitive time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted July 13, 2016 Author Share Posted July 13, 2016 1 minute ago, BOHICA said: No official professional time with vid proof has been put down by ford on any of their cars. The spectator timed lazy run, non competing time of the GT 350 is faster then any camaro time put down by GM when they closed the track and hauled their 1 off camaros to test on a closed track. Ford run there with everything else on the track on open track day just to test vehicle dynamics and not put down competitive time. True the gt350 could be even slower than we think Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gold Member BOHICA Posted July 13, 2016 Gold Member Share Posted July 13, 2016 12 minutes ago, Sludgey said: True the gt350 could be even slower than we think Unlikely.... Prolly faster if ford wanted to close, clean, and sweep the track like GM it could have a run faster and without traffic to deal with. Ford doesn't run at the ring to put down time. If they did they would be faster then GM my ford brother!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.