Jump to content
Check your account email address ×

Cat misses the mark, comes in too heavy


Rod

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Highmark said:

@Rw06GT:pc:

Laugh all you want I can tell you from experience once broken in they take well running NA 850's and chew them up and spit them out.

7750 188.0 127.4 0.600 112.7 71.7 13.35 2.9 1.001

7800 189.1 127.3 0.597 112.7 71.7 13.31 2.9 1.001

7850 189.9 127.1 0.595 112.9 71.7 13.23 2.9 1.001

7900 190.2 126.4 0.599 113.8 71.6 13.13 2.9 1.001

7950 190.2 125.7 0.602 114.3 71.6 13.04 2.9 1.001

8000 189.8 124.6 0.607 115.0 71.5 12.95 2.9 1.001

8050 188.5 123.0 0.616 115.9

I dunno doos performance has been so mediocre for 20 years it’s hard to have any faith 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DriftBusta said:

Yeah never mind all the shootout results.  Good trolling though.  Please don’t tell us that you think Polaris has been on top performance wise for 30 years lol

K

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member

So who do you guys feel met your performance standards over the last 20 years?  :lol:  

I guess I feel performance can be measured in multiple ways and they've all had some good ones and they've all had some dogs.  

Guess I've been lucky to be happy with every sled I've ever bought new in some way or another. 

Edited by Highmark
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, ZR6000RR said:

Greg said on Hardcore, his model weighed 490. Not so much on the spec sheet.

20231229_174332.jpg

What's that from??? Catalyst has 10.4 gallon tanks,,, or do they,,,,:lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, HSR said:

What's that from??? Catalyst has 10.4 gallon tanks,,, or do they,,,,:lol:

Rated. Actual is 10.4. Air space for expansion. Fuel pump and all the items that go with that, etc. Not rocket science. Well above you though.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ZR6000RR said:

Rated. Actual is 10.4. Air space for expansion. Fuel pump and all the items that go with that, etc. Not rocket science. Well above you though.

So it makes less hp on 91 oct than the 650 does on 87 oct. Thanks, that's good info.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, HSR said:

So it makes less hp on 91 oct than the 650 does on 87 oct. Thanks, that's good info.

Still a much better, faster sled though. No stop ride and a bomb between the legs is a bonus. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Highmark said:

@Rw06GT:pc:

Laugh all you want I can tell you from experience once broken in they take well running NA 850's and chew them up and spit them out.

7750 188.0 127.4 0.600 112.7 71.7 13.35 2.9 1.001

7800 189.1 127.3 0.597 112.7 71.7 13.31 2.9 1.001

7850 189.9 127.1 0.595 112.9 71.7 13.23 2.9 1.001

7900 190.2 126.4 0.599 113.8 71.6 13.13 2.9 1.001

7950 190.2 125.7 0.602 114.3 71.6 13.04 2.9 1.001

8000 189.8 124.6 0.607 115.0 71.5 12.95 2.9 1.001

8050 188.5 123.0 0.616 115.9

He’s renowned for the laugh emoticon without ever posting anything. Last post, February. Before that, July 2020. :wtf:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Anler said:

Looks like modern technology weighs about 20 lbs... :news:

wouldn’t surprise me to see a vr1 boost gape a competition 850 on meth 

competition 850 likely be a good race for 858 cat 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol

×
×
  • Create New...