Jump to content
Check your account email address ×

Archer Transcript


Recommended Posts

  • Platinum Contributing Member
47 minutes ago, SnowRider said:

:lol: :lmao: Gut-hooked again

 

 

I don't think anyone thought that Archer testimony would be anything more than more than evidence that further investigation into the money trail be needed.   Even if he testified that money went directly into a [Joe] Biden account.  Congressional testimony is not a judicial process.   It can only then lead to congress or a congressional  committee making a recommendation to the DOJ.  I think your assumption what anyone's expectations were here are way off. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
1 minute ago, spin_dry said:

Republicans do two things well. Make up conspiracies and chase a crack around. Other than that, they haven’t accomplished anything 

That's rich considering the past 6 years investigations into Trump and latest DC indictments against him.  :lol:  

Edited by Highmark
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Highmark said:

That's rich considering the past 6 years investigations into Trump and latest DC indictments against him.  :lol:  

The republicans are far from milking this hunter thing. Their followers are hanging on every word. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, spin_dry said:

Republicans do two things well. Make up conspiracies and chase a crack around. Other than that, they haven’t accomplished anything 

Oh please, stop being a dumbass. Russian Collusion was one of the biggest conspiracy hoaxes ever............created by radical, nutbag Democrats just like yourself. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
14 minutes ago, Highmark said:

I don't think anyone thought that Archer testimony would be anything more than more than evidence that further investigation into the money trail be needed.   Even if he testified that money went directly into a [Joe] Biden account.  Congressional testimony is not a judicial process.   It can only then lead to congress or a congressional  committee making a recommendation to the DOJ.  I think your assumption what anyone's expectations were here are way off. 

Well MC thought he was a Bank lawyer and a Campaign finance lawyer and SR thinks he is a Criminal lawyer..So yeah, there are some really fucking stupid people out there.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
24 minutes ago, spin_dry said:

The republicans are far from milking this hunter thing. Their followers are hanging on every word. 

This thing isn't really about Hunter and poorly portrayed as any thing but.   Yes he obviously was guilty of some things and was getting a sweetheart deal but honestly he's chicken feed.   

Personally I think the GOP has made a big mistake at the media focus they put forth being too much about Hunter and should more be about the connection (if one) with the President.  Seems that is the direction now but its been slow coming for evidence other that the laptop (Big Guy).

What Archer and others have testified should absolutely lead to a special prosecutor investigation into Joe's involvement.   Anyone else snared in that doing illegal activities so be it.      

Edited by Highmark
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Highmark said:

This thing isn't really about Hunter and poorly portrayed as any thing but.   Yes he obviously was guilty of some things and was getting a sweetheart deal but honestly he's chicken feed.   

Personally I think the GOP has made a big mistake at the media focus they put forth being too much about Hunter and should more be about the connection (if one) with the President.  Seems that is the direction now but its been slow coming for evidence other that the laptop (Big Guy).

What Archer and others have testified should absolutely lead to a special prosecutor investigation into Joe's involvement.   Anyone else snared in that doing illegal activities so be it.      

Everyone already knows that the republicans are trying to pin this hunter thing on Joe. The problem being that there’s no evidence. Just like the russiagate. No evidence. But because the republicans are basically inept at policy making and neither side is willing to work together, they continue the side show act. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, spin_dry said:

Everyone already knows that the republicans are trying to pin this hunter thing on Joe. The problem being that there’s no evidence. Just like the russiagate. No evidence. But because the republicans are basically inept at policy making and neither side is willing to work together, they continue the side show act. 

There is plenty of evidence, from burner phones to shell companies.  Like someone else said, stop being a dumbass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, spin_dry said:

Republicans do two things well. Make up conspiracies and chase a crack around. Other than that, they haven’t accomplished anything 

Spending money, starting wars, etc...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
24 minutes ago, spin_dry said:

Everyone already knows that the republicans are trying to pin this hunter thing on Joe. The problem being that there’s no evidence. Just like the russiagate. No evidence. But because the republicans are basically inept at policy making and neither side is willing to work together, they continue the side show act. 

There is far greater evidence for Joe's involvement here than there was on Trump/Russia election collusion. 

15 minutes ago, racer254 said:

There is plenty of evidence, from burner phones to shell companies.  Like someone else said, stop being a dumbass.

Buying burner phones and establishing 22 shell companies that literally have zero output is common in the business world.  :lol:  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
2 hours ago, Highmark said:

I don't think anyone thought that Archer testimony would be anything more than more than evidence that further investigation into the money trail be needed.   Even if he testified that money went directly into a [Joe] Biden account.  Congressional testimony is not a judicial process.   It can only then lead to congress or a congressional  committee making a recommendation to the DOJ.  I think your assumption what anyone's expectations were here are way off. 

:backpeddle:  Jimmy MAGAt’s has a thread that Dems were so worried about Archer they planned to use their biased DOJ throw him jail before he testified :news:

The Cult was all over it and in a flash…….you’ve got nothing again :lmao: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
1 hour ago, racer254 said:

There is plenty of evidence, from burner phones to shell companies.  Like someone else said, stop being a dumbass.

Should be easy…….where is it?  Are you saying Congressional Repugs are inept because they can’t produce it? :news: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Highmark said:

There is far greater evidence for Joe's involvement here than there was on Trump/Russia election collusion. 

Buying burner phones and establishing 22 shell companies that literally have zero output is common in the business world.  :lol:  

Installing morons on corporate boards based on name is very common. Buying burner phones and having shell companies doesn’t implicated Uncle Joe 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
14 minutes ago, spin_dry said:

Installing morons on corporate boards based on name is very common. Buying burner phones and having shell companies doesn’t implicated Uncle Joe 

Uncle Joe had a burner phone.  :lol:   I want to see information on the shell companies.  Its possible it was simply Joe swinging his name around for his druggie son and other family members but like I said above there is enough circumstantial evidence to warrant a special prosecutor.   Way more here than was on Trump/Russia. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol

×
×
  • Create New...