akvanden Posted November 30, 2022 Share Posted November 30, 2022 5 hours ago, ford_428cj said: And the clown wouldn't answer ...smh .. It’s a stupid question, saying it either protects 100% or it doesn’t, implying there’s nothing in between. It could protect you 25% or 75% and stupid would still say “you’re saying I can still get Covid, what’s the point?” Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted November 30, 2022 Share Posted November 30, 2022 8 hours ago, akvanden said: It’s a stupid question, saying it either protects 100% or it doesn’t, implying there’s nothing in between. It could protect you 25% or 75% and stupid would still say “you’re saying I can still get Covid, what’s the point?” So like ivermectin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akvanden Posted November 30, 2022 Share Posted November 30, 2022 12 minutes ago, ACE said: So like ivermectin No. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gold Member EvilBird Posted November 30, 2022 Gold Member Share Posted November 30, 2022 8 hours ago, akvanden said: It’s a stupid question, saying it either protects 100% or it doesn’t, implying there’s nothing in between. It could protect you 25% or 75% and stupid would still say “you’re saying I can still get Covid, what’s the point?” Remember when you said it was like 98% effective? Good times . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted November 30, 2022 Share Posted November 30, 2022 5 minutes ago, akvanden said: No. Why not Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted November 30, 2022 Share Posted November 30, 2022 3 minutes ago, EvilBird said: Remember when you said it was like 98% effective? Good times . And stopped transmission 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akvanden Posted November 30, 2022 Share Posted November 30, 2022 7 minutes ago, EvilBird said: Remember when you said it was like 98% effective? Good times . Nope. But I think you’re referring to the efficacy against the original strain. 3 minutes ago, ACE said: And stopped transmission Nope. 5 minutes ago, ACE said: Why not Large well known studies show no statistically significant benefit, aka zero. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted November 30, 2022 Share Posted November 30, 2022 6 minutes ago, akvanden said: Nope. But I think you’re referring to the efficacy against the original strain. Nope. Large well known studies show no statistically significant benefit, aka zero. Other large well known studies showed large benefits. Are you citing the ones that were funded by big pharma? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted November 30, 2022 Share Posted November 30, 2022 The clot shot also show very little effectiveness at all from stopping you from getting Covid 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akvanden Posted November 30, 2022 Share Posted November 30, 2022 1 minute ago, ACE said: Other large well known studies showed large benefits. Please post these large well known studies. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted November 30, 2022 Share Posted November 30, 2022 9 minutes ago, akvanden said: Please post these large well known studies. They’ve been posted many times. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akvanden Posted November 30, 2022 Share Posted November 30, 2022 2 minutes ago, ACE said: They’ve been posted many times. No large well known studies have been posted, that’s why I asked. No worries, we can move on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted November 30, 2022 Share Posted November 30, 2022 12 minutes ago, akvanden said: No large well known studies have been posted, that’s why I asked. No worries, we can move on. Yes they have. You just don’t understand science. The clot shot also has almost no efficacy in preventing Covid 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted November 30, 2022 Share Posted November 30, 2022 45 minutes ago, akvanden said: Nope. But I think you’re referring to the efficacy against the original strain. Nope. Large well known studies show no statistically significant benefit, aka zero. All pure fabrication. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted November 30, 2022 Share Posted November 30, 2022 A real cardiologist and what the vax is doing to the heart. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted November 30, 2022 Share Posted November 30, 2022 13 hours ago, Deephaven said: Why can't you do it then? You keep linking shit but can't explain anything. If you could think you wouldn't need links. You can't read moron? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gold Member EvilBird Posted November 30, 2022 Gold Member Share Posted November 30, 2022 1 hour ago, akvanden said: Nope. But I think you’re referring to the efficacy against the original strain. Nope. Large well known studies show no statistically significant benefit, aka zero. Yes , I am asking do you still believe the Jab had 98% efficacy against the original strain? Is that what you are honestly quadrupling down on ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted November 30, 2022 Share Posted November 30, 2022 13 minutes ago, EvilBird said: Yes , I am asking do you still believe the Jab had 98% efficacy against the original strain? Is that what you are honestly quadrupling down on ? He believes any nonsense CNN tells him. Here is the efficacy claims goalposts movement described. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted November 30, 2022 Share Posted November 30, 2022 Well another expert speak out. This time a Japanese Professor warms the dumb fucks at the Ministry Of Health. The vax rollout was the dumbest thing one could do and that has led to immune suppression. Bravo sheep. Bravo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deephaven Posted November 30, 2022 Share Posted November 30, 2022 1 hour ago, ArcticCrusher said: You can't read moron? You are the one that summarizes them wrong EVERY time you try. Explains why normally you just post the link. Considering the stupidity of your links, no one here outside of a few complete christian magatards actually click on them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted November 30, 2022 Share Posted November 30, 2022 1 minute ago, Deephaven said: You are the one that summarizes them wrong EVERY time you try. Explains why normally you just post the link. Considering the stupidity of your links, no one here outside of a few complete christian magatards actually click on them. No, you literally can't fucking read. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roosting Posted November 30, 2022 Share Posted November 30, 2022 13 hours ago, akvanden said: It’s a stupid question, saying it either protects 100% or it doesn’t, implying there’s nothing in between. It could protect you 25% or 75% and stupid would still say “you’re saying I can still get Covid, what’s the point?” So you were never able to quantify how effective the vax actually is/was? Try and nail that down so the audience can see for themselves if it lived up to what was promoted. The timeline we can use is from when it was introduced to when it was removed from service as ineffective to current strains. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akvanden Posted November 30, 2022 Share Posted November 30, 2022 46 minutes ago, EvilBird said: Yes , I am asking do you still believe the Jab had 98% efficacy against the original strain? Is that what you are honestly quadrupling down on ? This is pointless to the discussion, but let’s waste our time with old info. It never was 98%, all three vaccines had high efficacy rates against the original strain. Israel found similar results in their own testing. Efficacy changed with newer variants. What other old info do you want to discuss? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdsky Posted November 30, 2022 Share Posted November 30, 2022 Hard to believe anyone is defending these fucks. Giant fucking money grab and people are still lapping it up. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roosting Posted November 30, 2022 Share Posted November 30, 2022 2 hours ago, akvanden said: This is pointless to the discussion, but let’s waste our time with old info. It never was 98%, all three vaccines had high efficacy rates against the original strain. Israel found similar results in their own testing. Efficacy changed with newer variants. What other old info do you want to discuss? so did they stop using it or just soldered on with something completely ineffectve? And promoted it heavily too So what was the original efficacy rate and the efficacy rate to the variants ? Since you made the claim as you know the real facts lets see it. Or are you just repeating something from a point of ignorance that you heard on TV by a paid propagandist? 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.