Jump to content
Check your account email address ×

What should the House investigate?


Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Steve753 said:

Maybe the Republicans will call you to testify.

:lol:

Weird, not once have i seen you back a republican on this forum. But yet you say you’re not a Democrat. Do you realize how stupid you make yourself look 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said:

He was trafficking as well.

 

Heard that.  Pretty serious charges to be making, I'll be interested in hearing all about them.  We'll probably find out right after we get Epsteins client list and the  bodycam Paul Pelosi footage  :lol: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
16 minutes ago, DriftBusta said:

Any information on how much money changed hands, and who paid who?

Nope because it was ignored but Kushner got 2 Billion from The Saudis and his FIL was/is balls deep with them but I know that doesn’t bother you.:flush:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
Just now, toslow said:

Weird, not once have i seen you back a republican on this forum. But yet you say you’re not a Democrat. Do you realize how stupid you make yourself look 

Weird I thought DeSantis was a republican. You do know that don't you?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Plissken said:

1.    Carole Baskin

2.    Scott Tadych & Bobby Dassey

3.    Flight 19

How many hoaxes did you fall for.....

  • Russian collusion
  • Trump called neo-nazis “fine people”
  • Jussie Smollett
  • Bubba Wallace garage pull
  • Covington kids
  • Governor Whitmer kidnapping plot
  • Kavanaugh rape
  • Trump pee tape
  • COVID lab leak was a conspiracy theory
  • Border agents whipped migrants
  • Trump saved nuclear secrets at Mar-a-Lago
  • Steele Dossier
  • Russian bounties on US soldiers in Afghanistan
  • Trump said drinking bleach would fight COVID
  • Muslim travel ban
  • Hunter Biden’s laptop was Russian disinformation
  • Andrew Cuomo best COVID leadership
  • Trump built cages for migrant kids
  • “Austere religious scholar”
  • Trump overfed Koi fish in Japan
  • Build Back Better will pay for itself
  • Trump tax cuts benefited only the rich
  • Cloth masks prevent COVID
  • If you get vaccinated you won’t catch COVID
  • SUV killed parade marchers
  • Trump used tear gas to clear a crowd for a bible photo
  • “Don’t Say Gay” was in a bill
  • Putin price hike
  • Ivermectin is a horse dewormer and not for humans
  • “Mostly peaceful” protests
  • Trump overpowered secret service for wheel of “The Beast”
  • Officer Sicknick was murdered by protesters
  • January 6th was an insurrection
  • BYU students hurled racist insults at Duke volleyball player
  • And don’t forget “democracy is under threat…”
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jimmy Snacks said:

Nope because it was ignored but Kushner got 2 Billion from The Saudis and his FIL was/is balls deep with them but I know that doesn’t bother you.:flush:

So a successful 3rd generation billionaire family in the real estate business is somehow shady, but a skeevy crackhead taking $ from everyone from the mayor of Russia, to communist operatives in China is a comparable offense.  Not that I'd expect it to bother you or comprehend the difference either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Badger** said:

I'd like to hear the other side of the story about of January 6th. 

 

5 minutes ago, DriftBusta said:

Great point.  Bet it would bring bigger viewership #s than the sham excuse of the j6 hearings were too.


What other side? They all had a chance to represent themselves in a court of law before they were sentenced.

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, akvanden said:

 


What other side? They all had a chance to represent themselves in a court of law before they were sentenced.

Many of them are still in jail.  They haven't had much of a chance.  As far as the J6 hearings, you can't be serious if you think that was a fair and impartial inquiry into what really happened.  The random hand picked 2 R party members on the committee, either got destroyed electorally or resigned from Congress.  That should tell you something.

Edited by DriftBusta
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
Just now, DriftBusta said:

Who did?  Many of them are still in jail.  As far as the hearings, you can't be serious if you think that was a fair and impartial inquiry into what really happened.  The random hand picked 2 R party members on the committee, either got destroyed electorally or resigned from Congress.  That should tell you something.

What really happened then?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
1 minute ago, DriftBusta said:

You tell me.  You seem to have it all figured out.

It was a riot of sore losers incited by Trump. Pretty basic stuff.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
20 minutes ago, akvanden said:

 


What other side? They all had a chance to represent themselves in a court of law before they were sentenced.

No cross examination....it was nothing more than a sham. The Russia annexing territories of Ukraine had more merit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
Just now, ViperGTS/Z1 said:

No cross examination....it was nothing more than a sham. The Russia annexing territories of Ukraine had more merit.

What was there to cross examinate?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, DriftBusta said:

Who did?  Many of them are still in jail.  As far as the hearings, you can't be serious if you think that was a fair and impartial inquiry into what really happened.  The random hand picked 2 R party members on the committee, either got destroyed electorally or resigned from Congress.  That should tell you something.

Who?!? 950 have been convicted, 450 have pled guilty. I doubt many if any are sitting in jail awaiting trial. The only ones sitting in jail are the ones who’ve already been sentenced.

 

And yeah, that’s a pretty damn good time to tell your side of the story when you’re sitting in front of a judge trying to explain why you were there. And of course it’s public record, so what other part of the story do you want to know?

9_9

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, ViperGTS/Z1 said:

No cross examination....it was nothing more than a sham. The Russia annexing territories of Ukraine had more merit.

You’re confusing the public hearings and the actual sentencing in a court of law.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol

×
×
  • Create New...