Jump to content
Posted
  • USA Donating Member

here we go...

 

306331151_645480520280148_76267816546735
from https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=645480526946814&set=a.282183209943216&type=3&comment_id=3293263380957604&notif_id=1662840248855637&notif_t=feedback_reaction_generic&ref=notif

 

https://snowgoer.com/news/cat-unveils-new-catalyst-chassis-for-2024-kind-of/31001/

 

 

how much actual chassis was changed? IDK the RXC looks good though, I dig it.  edit: 137" ?  hmmmm... 

pile on boys, this isn't the brand specific safe space... and don't forget to in on one. 

:lol:

Edited by Crnr2Crnr

  • Replies 5.8k
  • Views 333.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • 85-225 primary spring- engaged slightly higher but grabbed the belt way too hard, lost about 300 rpms.   64 gram 48s 155/220- rpms went up to about 8000 picked up zero speed seat of pants wasn’

  • taperk600
    taperk600

    Sure....be warned, it's long....   Warning.....long winded report below... Went to the Catalyst demo rides in Old Forge today. We got there at 845 because of the posted show star

  • Yes, my Blue ZR was the major pig on the spit. But they did have one of the prototypes for a bit before mine came in and went up...... Both of mine are there now .....and something different may be co

Posted Images

Featured Replies

13 minutes ago, Deephaven said:

Don't forget the procross was perfect and the catalyst wasn't necessary.

Based on sales numbers maybe they weren’t wrong 😂

  • Author
  • USA Donating Member
3 hours ago, Deephaven said:

136/7 with a 1.75" is what I need.  Don't understand why a track option is such a hard thing in particular on a pre-order.

I'd go with a 128 Cobra, high quality 10T 2.52p drivers and 24/63 gearing... so it'd rip to 80+ and that's about it. 

 

 

Edited by Crnr2Crnr
oopsed

2 hours ago, Crnr2Crnr said:

I'd go with a 128 Cobra, high quality 10T 2.52p drivers and 24/63 gearing... so it'd rip to 80+ and that's about it. 

 

 

It does that now 

  • Author
  • USA Donating Member
13 minutes ago, Not greg b said:

It does that now 

this would get there quicker... 

Mike Kloety podcast up.  I'm sure some of the experts here could educate him on a lot of things

 

Screenshot_20240311-170954.png

26 minutes ago, mnstang said:

Mike Kloety podcast up.  I'm sure some of the experts here could educate him on a lot of things

 

Screenshot_20240311-170954.png

Do you think he’s excited about the state of arctic cat? He said in that podcast how much work they need to do on the catalyst 

20 minutes ago, Palu49 said:

Do you think he’s excited about the state of arctic cat? He said in that podcast how much work they need to do on the catalyst 

Lol this is so damn predictable fuck you guys are miserable.

  • Author
  • USA Donating Member
32 minutes ago, mnstang said:

Lol this is so damn predictable fuck you guys are miserable.

I've not listened to it yet... prepare for my doom and gloom report within the next 37 hours.  :lol:

But seriously... if I wanted to drop the coin for a new CC race sled right now it would be in my area code rather than TRF.  and with that said (still not having listened to it) what are the odds they show up at Hay Days with a new Team Arctic XC and SX sled?  As of the moment I'm at slim to naught. 

 

Edited by Crnr2Crnr
embellishment

  • Author
  • USA Donating Member

spitballing ... would Cat have done better with a short track RXC on the ice this season in retrospect?  

the clutching and top speed were still off the competition on ice at every race but ... 

10 minutes ago, Crnr2Crnr said:

spitballing ... would Cat have done better with a short track RXC on the ice this season in retrospect?  

the clutching and top speed were still off the competition on ice at every race but ... 

I don’t think so, but maybe on ice, they tested the sled both ways obviously but allegedly settled on the 137 because it worked better with the motor and weight shoved back and down. 

2 minutes ago, Palu49 said:

I don’t think so, but maybe on ice, they tested the sled both ways obviously but allegedly settled on the 137 because it worked better with the motor and weight shoved back and down. 

Herf found the speed on the last race. Penalized for a gas stop. Look out! Next winter is going to be fun. The racers chose the 137 btw. 

5 minutes ago, ZR6000RR said:

Herf found the speed on the last race. Penalized for a gas stop. Look out! Next winter is going to be fun. The racers chose the 137 btw. 

Who do you think I was talking about shit for brains

edit- enough speed to finish behind only one doo and one Polaris this time.

Edited by Palu49

11 minutes ago, ZR6000RR said:

Herf found the speed on the last race. Penalized for a gas stop. Look out! Next winter is going to be fun. The racers chose the 137 btw. 

Why didn't the 2020 RXC stick around for 21, 22, or 23?

Why did they not sell enough of them to race stock class?

137 is the new 129 which was the new 121 which was the new 116 etc.

  • Author
  • USA Donating Member
38 minutes ago, Palu49 said:

I don’t think so, but maybe on ice, they tested the sled both ways obviously but allegedly settled on the 137 because it worked better with the motor and weight shoved back and down. 

the ice racing sleds were 128's lowered and setup by those more qualified than you or I for ice and couldn't find the speed of (dare I say it?) the procross

34 minutes ago, ZR6000RR said:

Herf found the speed on the last race. Penalized for a gas stop. Look out! Next winter is going to be fun. The racers chose the 137 btw. 

via changes to the clutching or gearing?  at what point will Cat release the top secret gearing combo (bullshit) to other racers who have more access and insight than you?  no one here wishes Herf to be in 4th,, 7th or a DNF... but one of the best XC racers in my time got his ass beat by people on clearly superior sleds this season.  caveat being, no ditch racing because AK440 hates you. 

20 minutes ago, racinfarmer said:

Why didn't the 2020 RXC stick around for 21, 22, or 23?

Why did they not sell enough of them to race stock class?

137 is the new 129 which was the new 121 which was the new 116 etc.

I can't wait to see the replies to this one...

 popcorn-gif.1110469

 

 

.....

green-balloon-boner-up.gif

37 minutes ago, racinfarmer said:

Why didn't the 2020 RXC stick around for 21, 22, or 23?

Why did they not sell enough of them to race stock class?

137 is the new 129 which was the new 121 which was the new 116 etc.

If you cant handle 4 inches, you are truly fucked! That is the total difference between the 129 and 137, on snow length. Different sled, different results. Maybe race one once, instead of bitching about shit you have not ridden?

  • Author
  • USA Donating Member
2 hours ago, mnstang said:

Mike Kloety podcast up.  I'm sure some of the experts here could educate him on a lot of things

 

Screenshot_20240311-170954.png

link? 9_9

I'm gunna catch up on the SnoWest on YT until you make this easy... 

14 minutes ago, ZR6000RR said:

If you cant handle 4 inches, you are truly fucked! That is the total difference between the 129 and 137, on snow length. Different sled, different results. Maybe race one once, instead of bitching about shit you have not ridden?

Pretty sure he owned a 20 RXC, pretty sure he has more miles on a catalyst in reverse than you do total also 

10 minutes ago, Palu49 said:

Pretty sure he owned a 20 RXC, pretty sure he has more miles on a catalyst in reverse than you do total also 

And? The guy is as fake as you! Bitching and commenting on a fucking seat, and how everyone on Facebook hates it. Pathetic!

  • USA Donating Member
15 minutes ago, ZR6000RR said:

And? The guy is as fake as you! Bitching and commenting on a fucking seat, and how everyone on Facebook hates it. Pathetic!

Not nearly as pathetic as some jerkoff who only rode the sled in his yard, going on A I and telling the guys who actually rode the sled, that they are wrong about the seat.

Edited by krom

13 minutes ago, krom said:

Not nearly as pathetic as some jerkoff who only rode the sled in his yard, going on A I and telling the guys who actually rode the sled, that they are wrong about the seat.

What? 2% uncomfortable, with 75% never ridden? Rich! Proof the farmer who does not race has to have his fiucked up minions fight for him? Quit making it so easy.

16 minutes ago, krom said:

Not nearly as pathetic as some jerkoff who only rode the sled in his yard, going on A I and telling the guys who actually rode the sled, that they are wrong about the seat.

He rode more than you did no snow boy. 

  • USA Donating Member
1 minute ago, AK440 said:

He rode more than you did no snow boy. 

Pretty sure NY had more riding than MN this year.  I'd guess most folks on here did more riding than your cant afford a sled ass

4 minutes ago, krom said:

Pretty sure NY had more riding than MN this year.  I'd guess most folks on here did more riding than your cant afford a sled ass

Yet you are a minion to a total dipshit. Have to love those facts. So are you his pitcher or are you the catcher?  I bet you catch all you can.

11 minutes ago, ZR6000RR said:

What? 2% uncomfortable, with 75% never ridden? Rich! Proof the farmer who does not race has to have his fiucked up minions fight for him? Quit making it so easy.

If you want to join my team, feel free to submit your application to my HR department.  

I need someone who is all feisty like you.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.