Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted June 22, 2016 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted June 22, 2016 (edited) Its hilarious hearing you libs defend and support these people. Most transparent administration ever. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/06/22/clinton-it-specialist-invokes-5th-more-than-125-times-in-deposition.html The official said Pagliano was working off an index card and read the same crafted statement each time. “It was a sad day for government transparency,” the Judicial Watch official said, adding they asked all their questions and Pagliano invoked the Fifth Amendment right not to answer them. Pagliano was a central figure in the set-up and management of Clinton’s personal server she used exclusively for government business while secretary of state. The State Department inspector general found Clinton violated government rules with that arrangement. He was deposed as part of Judicial Watch's lawsuit seeking Clinton emails and other records. A federal judge granted discovery, in turn allowing the depositions, which is highly unusual in a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit. The judge cited "reasonable suspicion" Clinton and her aides were trying to avoid federal records law. Pagliano’s deposition before Judicial Watch is one of several interviews with high-profile Clinton aides, taking place as the FBI separately is continuing its federal criminal investigation. A federal court agreed to keep sealed Pagliano’s immunity deal struck with the Justice Department in December, citing the sensitivity of the FBI probe and calling it a “criminal” matter. The next Clinton aide to testify is Huma Abedin. In an earlier deposition, lawyers for senior Clinton aide Cheryl Mills, during a nearly five-hour deposition in Washington, repeatedly objected to questions about Pagliano’s role in setting up the former secretary of state’s private server. According to a transcript of that deposition which Judicial Watch released, Mills attorney Beth Wilkinson – as well as Obama administration lawyers – objected to the line of questioning about Pagliano. “I'm going to instruct her not to answer. It's a legal question,” Wilkinson responded, when asked by Judicial Watch whether Pagliano was an “agent of the Clintons” when the server was set up. A transcript of the Pagliano deposition will be reviewed and is expected to be released next week. Clinton could also be deposed in the Judicial Watch lawsuit. There was no immediate comment from Pagliano's attorney. Catherine Herridge is an award-winning Chief Intelligence correspondent for FOX News Channel (FNC) based in Washington, D.C. She covers intelligence, the Justice Department and the Department of Homeland Security. Herridge joined FNC in 1996 as a London-based correspondent. Pamela K. Browne is Senior Executive Producer at the FOX News Channel (FNC) and is Director of Long-Form Series and Specials. Her journalism has been recognized with several awards. Browne first joined FOX in 1997 to launch the news magazine “Fox Files” and later, “War Stories. ” Edited June 22, 2016 by Highmark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elkhorn Posted June 22, 2016 Share Posted June 22, 2016 We encourage everyone to fully cooperate.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Momorider Posted June 22, 2016 Share Posted June 22, 2016 Sad day for government transparency Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Momorider Posted June 22, 2016 Share Posted June 22, 2016 Wikileaks will be Epic Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oleroule Posted June 22, 2016 Share Posted June 22, 2016 the guy is just trying to stay alive. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted June 22, 2016 Author Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted June 22, 2016 19 minutes ago, Momorider said: Wikileaks will be Epic I hope Putin and Wikileaks destroy her with releases of emails. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Skidooski Posted June 22, 2016 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted June 22, 2016 Nothing to hide Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ebsell Posted June 22, 2016 Share Posted June 22, 2016 5th amendment in court is a way of saying you're guilty as fuck without going to jail. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted June 22, 2016 Share Posted June 22, 2016 He would have incriminated himself over 125 times???? Wtf??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mileage Psycho Posted June 23, 2016 Share Posted June 23, 2016 The Constitution we know you all strongly support it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepr2 Posted June 23, 2016 Share Posted June 23, 2016 8 minutes ago, Mileage Psycho said: The Constitution we know you all strongly support it. Suddenly Vince like the constitution Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gold Member BOHICA Posted June 23, 2016 Gold Member Share Posted June 23, 2016 If Trump is elected as president he is going to cook that bitch. Just watching that happen is worth voting for him.... Getting that done will make him the best and most productive president we have had in 16 years. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted June 23, 2016 Share Posted June 23, 2016 12 hours ago, Mileage Psycho said: The Constitution we know you all strongly support it. Ironic you can even spell Constitution. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member SnowRider Posted June 23, 2016 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted June 23, 2016 10 minutes ago, Snake said: Ironic you can even spell Constitution. It's more difficult than 'Union' Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mileage Psycho Posted June 23, 2016 Share Posted June 23, 2016 5 hours ago, Snake said: Ironic you can even spell Constitution. Hey I have an opinion on who can and can't own a gun, it may not be today or tomorrow but at some point the political reality will be if you're on the terror/no-fly list you ain't gonna be able to buy a gun. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted June 23, 2016 Share Posted June 23, 2016 Poor Wince ....I wonder what its like to be wrong almost all the time Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member SnowRider Posted June 23, 2016 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted June 23, 2016 (edited) "The Second Amendment has a preamble about the need for a militia ... Historically, the new government had no money to pay for an army, so they relied on the state militias," she said. "The states required men to have certain weapons and they specified in the law what weapons these people had to keep in their home so that when they were called to do service as militiamen, they would have them. That was the entire purpose of the Second Amendment."Ginsburg said the disappearance of that purpose eliminates the function of the Second Amendment."It's function is to enable the young nation to have people who will fight for it to have weapons that those soldiers will own," she said. "I view the Second Amendment as rooted in the time totally allied to the need to support a militia. So ... the Second Amendment is outdated in the sense that its function has become obsolete." http://randyreport.blogspot.com/2016/06/supreme-court-justice-ruth-bader.html Edited June 23, 2016 by SnowRider Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capt.Storm Posted June 23, 2016 Share Posted June 23, 2016 3 minutes ago, SnowRider said: "The Second Amendment has a preamble about the need for a militia ... Historically, the new government had no money to pay for an army, so they relied on the state militias," she said. "The states required men to have certain weapons and they specified in the law what weapons these people had to keep in their home so that when they were called to do service as militiamen, they would have them. That was the entire purpose of the Second Amendment."Ginsburg said the disappearance of that purpose eliminates the function of the Second Amendment."It's function is to enable the young nation to have people who will fight for it to have weapons that those soldiers will own," she said. "I view the Second Amendment as rooted in the time totally allied to the need to support a militia. So ... the Second Amendment is outdated in the sense that its function has become obsolete." http://randyreport.blogspot.com/2016/06/supreme-court-justice-ruth-bader.html So she's saying we the people should have no guns? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted June 23, 2016 Share Posted June 23, 2016 37 minutes ago, Mileage Psycho said: Hey I have an opinion on who can and can't own a gun, it may not be today or tomorrow but at some point the political reality will be if you're on the terror/no-fly list you ain't gonna be able to buy a gun. 37 minutes ago, Mileage Psycho said: Hey I have an opinion on who can and can't own a gun, it may not be today or tomorrow but at some point the political reality will be if you're on the terror/no-fly list you ain't gonna be able to buy a gun. It's a bit of a stretch to call it your opinion, imo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capt.Storm Posted June 23, 2016 Share Posted June 23, 2016 1 hour ago, Sludgey said: It's a bit of a stretch to call it your opinion, imo. WTF you mean by that..it is his opinion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capt.Storm Posted June 23, 2016 Share Posted June 23, 2016 and he's prolly right. If you can fawk the constitution with a no-fly list ,certainly you can fawk it again by saying you can''t buy a gun if you are on it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted June 23, 2016 Share Posted June 23, 2016 (edited) 27 minutes ago, Capt.Storm said: WTF you mean by that..it is his opinion. His opinions are given to him by MSNBC. Edited June 23, 2016 by Sludgey Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capt.Storm Posted June 23, 2016 Share Posted June 23, 2016 1 minute ago, Sludgey said: His opinions are givin to him by MSNBC. Well in that case..forget what I sad then. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Momorider Posted June 23, 2016 Share Posted June 23, 2016 2 hours ago, f7ben said: Poor Wince ....I wonder what its like to be wrong almost all the time Ask Taintrider or MaineCUNT Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wildcat Posted June 23, 2016 Share Posted June 23, 2016 2 hours ago, Mileage Psycho said: Hey I have an opinion on who can and can't own a gun, it may not be today or tomorrow but at some point the political reality will be if you're on the terror/no-fly list you ain't gonna be able to buy a gun. Problem with the no fly is how many false positives are involved. And even the terror list. My opinion is take all 60,000 of them and fucking deport all of them along with every single illegal immigrant. Id be down with the terror list only but i like the 3 day window. its totally reasonable just fucking take it. were throwing up softballs here Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.