Capt.Storm Posted June 23, 2016 Share Posted June 23, 2016 1 minute ago, Wildcat said: Problem with the no fly is how many false positives are involved. And even the terror list. My opinion is take all 60,000 of them and fucking deport all of them along with every single illegal immigrant. Id be down with the terror list only but i like the 3 day window. its totally reasonable just fucking take it. were throwing up softballs here Well you have to go with safety first they say. I do like the 3 day window. I mean if you're going to fawk the constitution least give a chance for a guy to defend himself. But remember It's Barry that is doing the constitution fawking now..he extended things and is calling it the Freedom Act now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wildcat Posted June 23, 2016 Share Posted June 23, 2016 2 hours ago, SnowRider said: "The Second Amendment has a preamble about the need for a militia ... Historically, the new government had no money to pay for an army, so they relied on the state militias," she said. "The states required men to have certain weapons and they specified in the law what weapons these people had to keep in their home so that when they were called to do service as militiamen, they would have them. That was the entire purpose of the Second Amendment."Ginsburg said the disappearance of that purpose eliminates the function of the Second Amendment."It's function is to enable the young nation to have people who will fight for it to have weapons that those soldiers will own," she said. "I view the Second Amendment as rooted in the time totally allied to the need to support a militia. So ... the Second Amendment is outdated in the sense that its function has become obsolete." http://randyreport.blogspot.com/2016/06/supreme-court-justice-ruth-bader.html The words overthrow the gov. override the alleged "intent" you speak of Im a firm believer in minimal gov. Just like this guy. Its a shame this dude wasn't given a chance. Here he is totally predicting that bill clintons shit actions basically led to iraq. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Momorider Posted June 23, 2016 Share Posted June 23, 2016 1 minute ago, Capt.Storm said: Well you have to go with safety first they say. I do like the 3 day window. I mean if you're going to fawk the constitution least give a chance for a guy to defend himself. But remember It's Barry that is doing the constitution fawking now..he extended things and is calling it the Freedom Act now. You expext anything the government does specially a court to work in 3 days Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capt.Storm Posted June 23, 2016 Share Posted June 23, 2016 Just now, Momorider said: You expext anything the government does specially a court to work in 3 days I stole your emos..I was to lazy to click on my own. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wildcat Posted June 23, 2016 Share Posted June 23, 2016 17 minutes ago, Capt.Storm said: I stole your emos..I was to lazy to click on my own. In bold. Good idea im using that. But really i have no reason to be on the terror list but i do want some kind of option to prove you aren't an issue. It should be pretty clear in a court/interview who is an issue and not. My record speaks for itself. Spotless and guess what i earned the right to own an AR or whatever i want. You need to work your way up to that. There are rights but also if you are an illegal alien shouldnt be able to touch guns. its actually striking there are 60,000 people on the terrorist watch list. Thats right all those mofos in our country even if that number is off holy shit Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capt.Storm Posted June 23, 2016 Share Posted June 23, 2016 (edited) 5 minutes ago, Wildcat said: In bold. Good idea im using that. But really i have no reason to be on the terror list but i do want some kind of option to prove you aren't an issue. It should be pretty clear in a court/interview who is an issue and not. My record speaks for itself. Spotless and guess what i earned the right to own an AR or whatever i want. You need to work your way up to that. There are rights but also if you are an illegal alien shouldnt be able to touch guns. its actually striking there are 60,000 people on the terrorist watch list. Thats right all those mofos in our country even if that number is off holy shit I concur with you. Also I don't think a illegal alien can buy guns legally in this country as it is. I never said I was for the no-fly list ti begin with ..I only said it exist because Barry extend the constitutional fawk you. Edited June 23, 2016 by Capt.Storm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted June 23, 2016 Share Posted June 23, 2016 2 hours ago, SnowRider said: "The Second Amendment has a preamble about the need for a militia ... Historically, the new government had no money to pay for an army, so they relied on the state militias," she said. "The states required men to have certain weapons and they specified in the law what weapons these people had to keep in their home so that when they were called to do service as militiamen, they would have them. That was the entire purpose of the Second Amendment."Ginsburg said the disappearance of that purpose eliminates the function of the Second Amendment."It's function is to enable the young nation to have people who will fight for it to have weapons that those soldiers will own," she said. "I view the Second Amendment as rooted in the time totally allied to the need to support a militia. So ... the Second Amendment is outdated in the sense that its function has become obsolete." http://randyreport.blogspot.com/2016/06/supreme-court-justice-ruth-bader.html Justice Scalia wrote the Court's decision on District of Columbia v. Heller on Jun 26, 2008: Overturning DC's handgun ban, the court ruled that the Second Amendment protects the individual right to own a gun for private use--not only in connection with service in a militia. The 5-to-4 decision, District of Columbia v. Heller, left unanswered questions, but also much room for continued gun regulation, short of an absolute ban. HELD: Delivered by Scalia; joined by Roberts, Kennedy, Thomas, Alito The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home. The Antifederalists feared that the Federal Government would disarm the people in order to disable the citizens' militia, enabling a politicized standing army or a select militia to rule. The response was to deny Congress power to abridge the ancient right of individuals to keep and bear arms. http://www.ontheissues.org/Court/Antonin_Scalia_Gun_Control.htm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Momorider Posted June 24, 2016 Share Posted June 24, 2016 1 hour ago, Wildcat said: In bold. Good idea im using that. But really i have no reason to be on the terror list but i do want some kind of option to prove you aren't an issue. It should be pretty clear in a court/interview who is an issue and not. My record speaks for itself. Spotless and guess what i earned the right to own an AR or whatever i want. You need to work your way up to that. There are rights but also if you are an illegal alien shouldnt be able to touch guns. its actually striking there are 60,000 people on the terrorist watch list. Thats right all those mofos in our country even if that number is off holy shit 59k of those are foreigners somebody posted they had a buddy on the no fly list cuz they got drunk on a plane and pissed off the wrong guy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.