Cat45 Posted May 25, 2022 Share Posted May 25, 2022 10 minutes ago, HSR said: I'm Canadian so bear with me,,,what are Repubs talking points?? Same subjects as the dems, just 180deg opposite. Anything to distract the public from the fucking we're getting from the government 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gold Member 800renegaderider Posted May 25, 2022 Gold Member Share Posted May 25, 2022 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted May 25, 2022 Share Posted May 25, 2022 3 hours ago, f7ben said: Because American citizens being armed to the teeth scares the fuck out of the fascists running our government . It terrifies law enforcement also Nope they love an armed population. They know the citizens of USA couldn't organize a shit fight in an outhouse. The left and the right would go to war with each other first and the government will be there to rule who's ever left standing. Christ even Canada had to show you guys how to organize a convoy on a Capital. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cat45 Posted May 25, 2022 Share Posted May 25, 2022 9 minutes ago, HSR said: Nope they love an armed population. They know the citizens of USA couldn't organize a shit fight in an outhouse. The left and the right would go to war with each other first and the government will be there to rule who's ever left standing. Christ even Canada had to show you guys how to organize a convoy on a Capital. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anler Posted May 25, 2022 Share Posted May 25, 2022 55 minutes ago, HSR said: Nope they love an armed population. They know the citizens of USA couldn't organize a shit fight in an outhouse. The left and the right would go to war with each other first and the government will be there to rule who's ever left standing. Christ even Canada had to show you guys how to organize a convoy on a Capital. You are not lying Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted May 25, 2022 Share Posted May 25, 2022 4 hours ago, Highmark said: Why is it guns are the only things involved with injury and death that the method is the issue. Drunk driving its always the driver....not the booze or vehicle. Violence with every other type of weapon we never talk about limiting those items like knives and what not. Even drug overdoses we don't blame the drug itself. Even with suicide we blame the gun. Nobody cares about Tylenol if someone swallows a bottle of them. Because vehicles have a superior service to society. They are absolutely necessary to how we function. Guns are not, they are ancillary to our society functioning. They are a pleasure, not a requirement. The design and deployment for the overwhelmingly vast majority of guns are to damage and kill. Cars, again, are not, and many deploy standards towards the opposite in fact. When we as citizens take to the roadways, we understand and assume the small risk of death that can happen. It seems like we shouldn't have to assume that same risk for our children at schools. Neal 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted May 25, 2022 Author Share Posted May 25, 2022 12 minutes ago, NaturallyAspirated said: Because vehicles have a superior service to society. They are absolutely necessary to how we function. Guns are not, they are ancillary to our society functioning. They are a pleasure, not a requirement. The design and deployment for the overwhelmingly vast majority of guns are to damage and kill. Cars, again, are not, and many deploy standards towards the opposite in fact. When we as citizens take to the roadways, we understand and assume the small risk of death that can happen. It seems like we shouldn't have to assume that same risk for our children at schools. Neal What a load of shit 2 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted May 25, 2022 Share Posted May 25, 2022 1 minute ago, f7ben said: What a load of shit Neal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Steve753 Posted May 25, 2022 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted May 25, 2022 20 minutes ago, NaturallyAspirated said: Because vehicles have a superior service to society. They are absolutely necessary to how we function. Guns are not, they are ancillary to our society functioning. They are a pleasure, not a requirement. The design and deployment for the overwhelmingly vast majority of guns are to damage and kill. Cars, again, are not, and many deploy standards towards the opposite in fact. When we as citizens take to the roadways, we understand and assume the small risk of death that can happen. It seems like we shouldn't have to assume that same risk for our children at schools. Neal Just stfu. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted May 25, 2022 Share Posted May 25, 2022 1 minute ago, Steve753 said: Just stfu. Fuck off cunt. Neal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
motonoggin Posted May 25, 2022 Share Posted May 25, 2022 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkisNH Posted May 25, 2022 Share Posted May 25, 2022 29 minutes ago, NaturallyAspirated said: Because vehicles have a superior service to society. They are absolutely necessary to how we function. Guns are not, they are ancillary to our society functioning. They are a pleasure, not a requirement. The design and deployment for the overwhelmingly vast majority of guns are to damage and kill. Cars, again, are not, and many deploy standards towards the opposite in fact. When we as citizens take to the roadways, we understand and assume the small risk of death that can happen. It seems like we shouldn't have to assume that same risk for our children at schools. Neal Without guns you would likely still be a British Subject.... With regards to the school shooter. If he didn't have a gun, do you think he might quietly break into the school with a 20oz soda bottle full of gasoline....he could have barricaded himself in the same room and torched everything. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Badger** Posted May 25, 2022 Share Posted May 25, 2022 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Badger** Posted May 25, 2022 Share Posted May 25, 2022 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Badger** Posted May 25, 2022 Share Posted May 25, 2022 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted May 25, 2022 Share Posted May 25, 2022 8 minutes ago, SkisNH said: do you think he might quietly break into the school with a 20oz soda bottle full of gasoline....he could have barricaded himself in the same room and torched everything. Nahhh,,,nobody ever did that is a movie and probably isn't an option on Grand Theft Auto V10.8. Also it would take a huge amount of balls and ingenuity. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted May 26, 2022 Share Posted May 26, 2022 2 hours ago, SkisNH said: Without guns you would likely still be a British Subject.... With regards to the school shooter. If he didn't have a gun, do you think he might quietly break into the school with a 20oz soda bottle full of gasoline....he could have barricaded himself in the same room and torched everything. Seems much less unlikely. There is far more ability to subdue a person with a gas can that isn't lit than a person armed and wearing bulletproof attire. Neal 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Steve753 Posted May 26, 2022 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted May 26, 2022 11 minutes ago, NaturallyAspirated said: Seems much less unlikely. There is far more ability to subdue a person with a gas can that isn't lit than a person armed and wearing bulletproof attire. Neal And how do you know that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkisNH Posted May 26, 2022 Share Posted May 26, 2022 10 minutes ago, NaturallyAspirated said: Seems much less unlikely. There is far more ability to subdue a person with a gas can that isn't lit than a person armed and wearing bulletproof attire. Neal Do we even know they are a threat? No body armor, no visible long gun.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted May 26, 2022 Share Posted May 26, 2022 8 hours ago, Bontz said: Says the dumb motherfucker who thinks eliminating guns is even possible. Seriously Ben ... you've taken stupidity to a level never seen. I mean, you're making 550 look like a Rhodes Scholar. Why you little bastid!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted May 26, 2022 Share Posted May 26, 2022 37 minutes ago, Steve753 said: And how do you know that? Common sense. Neal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted May 26, 2022 Share Posted May 26, 2022 37 minutes ago, SkisNH said: Do we even know they are a threat? No body armor, no visible long gun.... How many cases of successful gas bomb destination in a barricaded classroom have there been? Let's look at the evidence. Neal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Steve753 Posted May 26, 2022 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted May 26, 2022 (edited) 2 minutes ago, NaturallyAspirated said: Common sense. Neal You've shown numerous times not possess any of that. Try again. Edited May 26, 2022 by Steve753 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted May 26, 2022 Share Posted May 26, 2022 Just now, Steve753 said: You shown numerous times not possess any of that. Try again. You speak English, Mr. Common Sense Analyst? Neal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted May 26, 2022 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted May 26, 2022 (edited) 17 minutes ago, NaturallyAspirated said: How many cases of successful gas bomb destination in a barricaded classroom have there been? Let's look at the evidence. Neal Have you given up all your guns? Common sense tells me this kid was going to kill alkt of people with or without guns. The Bath School disaster, also known as the Bath School massacre,[Note 1] was a series of violent attacks perpetrated by Andrew Kehoe on May 18, 1927, in Bath Township, Michigan, United States. The attacks killed 38 elementary schoolchildren and 6 adults, and injured at least 58 other people. Prior to his timed explosives detonating at the Bath Consolidated School building, Kehoe had murdered his wife, Nellie Price Kehoe, and firebombed his farm. Arriving at the site of the school explosion, Kehoe died when he detonated explosives concealed in his truck. Edited May 26, 2022 by Highmark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.