Platinum Contributing Member Rigid1 Posted September 9, 2021 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted September 9, 2021 (edited) 1 hour ago, ActionfigureJoe said: There’s zero clinical evidence of ivermectin working. Even the pharmaceutical company that carries the patent insists it not be used for Covid. With that said, if a person wants to take rat poison because they think it might help should be allowed too. At the same time, medical professionals that resist prescribing the drug shouldn’t be forced to do so. Why do you completely lie?? https://journals.lww.com/americantherapeutics/fulltext/2021/08000/ivermectin_for_prevention_and_treatment_of.7.aspx Bryant, Andrew MSc1,*; Lawrie, Theresa A. MBBCh, PhD2; Dowswell, Therese PhD2; Fordham, Edmund J. PhD2; Mitchell, Scott MBChB, MRCS3; Hill, Sarah R. PhD1; Tham, Low-certainty evidence found that ivermectin prophylaxis reduced COVID-19 infection by an average 86% (95% confidence interval 79%–91%) Conclusions: Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin. Using ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers progressing to severe disease. The apparent safety and low cost suggest that ivermectin is likely to have a significant impact on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic globally. Edited September 9, 2021 by Rigid1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crowder Posted September 9, 2021 Share Posted September 9, 2021 32 minutes ago, Rigid1 said: Why do you completely lie?? https://journals.lww.com/americantherapeutics/fulltext/2021/08000/ivermectin_for_prevention_and_treatment_of.7.aspx Bryant, Andrew MSc1,*; Lawrie, Theresa A. MBBCh, PhD2; Dowswell, Therese PhD2; Fordham, Edmund J. PhD2; Mitchell, Scott MBChB, MRCS3; Hill, Sarah R. PhD1; Tham, Low-certainty evidence found that ivermectin prophylaxis reduced COVID-19 infection by an average 86% (95% confidence interval 79%–91%) Conclusions: Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin. Using ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers progressing to severe disease. The apparent safety and low cost suggest that ivermectin is likely to have a significant impact on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic globally. Interesting. If that’s true it pretty much blows a hole the leftists arguments doesn’t it. Sadly it’s political for some odd reason. I guess you could claim they are downright lying…..if real research shows otherwise. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CFM Posted September 9, 2021 Share Posted September 9, 2021 Actionjoe, you need to stop spreading all this misinformation. Was funny at first but you are seriously going to hurt someone with it. Try to stay with something you actually know, what ever that is. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Rigid1 Posted September 9, 2021 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted September 9, 2021 1 minute ago, Crowder said: Interesting. If that’s true it pretty much blows a hole the leftists arguments doesn’t it. Sadly it’s political for some odd reason. I guess you could claim they are downright lying…..if real research shows otherwise. It's just bizzaro world man, it's as if they don't want it to work or are just super pissed they were freaking out, volunteered to be lab rats, have no clue of what the long term effects of what they put in there bodies and since they did it everyone else should 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted September 9, 2021 Share Posted September 9, 2021 Why not just get the Pfizer vaccine? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CFM Posted September 9, 2021 Share Posted September 9, 2021 Remember Biden, Harris, Cuomo, many others saying they won't take the vaccine Trump helped bring to the table. They can't trust anything his admin coms out with.....lololololololololool Here's one of many: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angry ginger Posted September 9, 2021 Share Posted September 9, 2021 it's good to trust scientist over politicians so in that case Biden was right. Too easy to use the vax as a political weapon so believing politicians is the last thing anyone should do. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
irv Posted September 9, 2021 Share Posted September 9, 2021 21 minutes ago, Rigid1 said: It's just bizzaro world man, it's as if they don't want it to work or are just super pissed they were freaking out, volunteered to be lab rats, have no clue of what the long term effects of what they put in there bodies and since they did it everyone else should Of course they don't want it to work. Trump touted both alternatives so the Dems and their funded media attacked him repeatedly for it. Unfortunately, just like what we are seeing here, the sheep/TDS sufferers gobbled it right up like the good little braindead morons they are. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Rigid1 Posted September 9, 2021 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted September 9, 2021 26 minutes ago, Mainecat said: Why not just get the Pfizer vaccine? Because I don't know the long term effects.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
irv Posted September 9, 2021 Share Posted September 9, 2021 (edited) 8 minutes ago, Rigid1 said: Because I don't know the long term effects.. Inexcusable, anti-vaxxer!!! Edited September 9, 2021 by irv Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CFM Posted September 9, 2021 Share Posted September 9, 2021 Biden unleashing vaccine bomb on everyone right now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ActionfigureJoe Posted September 9, 2021 Share Posted September 9, 2021 2 hours ago, Rigid1 said: Why do you completely lie?? https://journals.lww.com/americantherapeutics/fulltext/2021/08000/ivermectin_for_prevention_and_treatment_of.7.aspx Bryant, Andrew MSc1,*; Lawrie, Theresa A. MBBCh, PhD2; Dowswell, Therese PhD2; Fordham, Edmund J. PhD2; Mitchell, Scott MBChB, MRCS3; Hill, Sarah R. PhD1; Tham, Low-certainty evidence found that ivermectin prophylaxis reduced COVID-19 infection by an average 86% (95% confidence interval 79%–91%) Conclusions: Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin. Using ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers progressing to severe disease. The apparent safety and low cost suggest that ivermectin is likely to have a significant impact on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic globally. That study was found to contain erroneous and plagiarized information. Sorry, try again. There is a very well documented and broad based study with full peer review being released soon. Hopefully it’ll show something promising about ivermectin. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02081-w Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Rigid1 Posted September 9, 2021 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted September 9, 2021 3 minutes ago, ActionfigureJoe said: That study was found to contain erroneous and plagiarized information. Sorry, try again. There is a very well documented and broad based study with full peer review being released soon. Hopefully it’ll show something promising about ivermectin. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02081-w You link doesn't mention a thing about THE STUDY BY THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF THERAPEUTICS THAT BEEN AROUND FOR 28 FUCKING YEARS.. Get over your God complex, you spew bullshit to satisfy your ego..Loser 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ActionfigureJoe Posted September 9, 2021 Share Posted September 9, 2021 9 minutes ago, Rigid1 said: You link doesn't mention a thing about THE STUDY BY THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF THERAPEUTICS THAT BEEN AROUND FOR 28 FUCKING YEARS.. Get over your God complex, you spew bullshit to satisfy your ego..Loser The American journal of therapeutics doesnt do studies. They publish meta-data analysis. That like saying Motor Trend magazine builds cars. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted September 9, 2021 Share Posted September 9, 2021 55 minutes ago, ActionfigureJoe said: The American journal of therapeutics doesnt do studies. They publish meta-data analysis. That like saying Motor Trend magazine builds cars. Why are you wrong so often? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Rigid1 Posted September 9, 2021 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted September 9, 2021 (edited) 1 hour ago, ActionfigureJoe said: The American journal of therapeutics doesnt do studies. They publish meta-data analysis. That like saying Motor Trend magazine builds cars. You posted a fucking satire article to try and debunk an article from the American Therapeutic Journal??? Your article lists no directors at the top, it's an opinion piece Medical Journals post others research and you know this and then you attempt to say the article is plagiarized, but the 7 doctors are listed at the top just like every one of us were taught by 8th grade English and needs to be done when USING SOMEONE ELSES WORK.. Apparently you must have skipped 8th grade English class.. Your lame motor trend mag comparison is extremely desperate and lends itself more to what you posted than I... You fucking lied to sound intelligent and got fucking burned.. Edited September 9, 2021 by Rigid1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ActionfigureJoe Posted September 10, 2021 Share Posted September 10, 2021 1 hour ago, Rigid1 said: You posted a fucking satire article to try and debunk an article from the American Therapeutic Journal??? Your article lists no directors at the top, it's an opinion piece Medical Journals post others research and you know this and then you attempt to say the article is plagiarized, but the 7 doctors are listed at the top just like every one of us were taught by 8th grade English and needs to be done when USING SOMEONE ELSES WORK.. Apparently you must have skipped 8th grade English class.. Your lame motor trend mag comparison is extremely desperate and lends itself more to what you posted than I... You fucking lied to sound intelligent and got fucking burned.. Medical Journals don’t do research studies. I assumed everyone knew that. The fact that is you tried to look smart and stumbled over your stupidity and ignorance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Rigid1 Posted September 10, 2021 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted September 10, 2021 4 hours ago, ActionfigureJoe said: Medical Journals don’t do research studies. I assumed everyone knew that. The fact that is you tried to look smart and stumbled over your stupidity and ignorance. Nice try loser, go start another thread, toss in some lies, stroke your God complex..Pathetic............. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anler Posted September 10, 2021 Share Posted September 10, 2021 20 hours ago, ActionfigureJoe said: There’s zero clinical evidence of ivermectin working. Even the pharmaceutical company that carries the patent insists it not be used for Covid. With that said, if a person wants to take rat poison because they think it might help should be allowed too. At the same time, medical professionals that resist prescribing the drug shouldn’t be forced to do so. Its not intended for COVID but there have been numerous cases of it working. too much to be ignored. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.