Platinum Contributing Member Skidooski Posted December 22, 2016 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted December 22, 2016 Why.....Cause you have to keep up with the Joneses? Quote The president-elect, who takes office next month, said the US must take such action "until such time as the world comes to its senses regarding nukes". He spoke hours after President Vladimir Putin said Russia needs to bolster its military nuclear potential. The US has 7,100 nuclear weapons and Russia has 7,300, according to the US nonpartisan Arms Control Association. We need more nukes until the world comes to it's senses about nukes? http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-38410027 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted December 22, 2016 Share Posted December 22, 2016 did skidoo's girlfriend hack his account? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Skidooski Posted December 22, 2016 Author Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted December 22, 2016 1 minute ago, Snoslinger said: did skidoo's girlfriend hack his account? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted December 22, 2016 Share Posted December 22, 2016 Russia has more nukes then the us and that's the country that Hillary wanted to go to war with. Interesting Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted December 22, 2016 Share Posted December 22, 2016 24 minutes ago, Skidooski said: well you're creating anti-trump threads, bashing trumpsters....what gives? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICEMAN! Posted December 22, 2016 Share Posted December 22, 2016 Trump will build the best nukes. Big beautiful tremendous nukes. He knows more about nukes than the nuclear scientists. He's going to make nukes great again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spin_dry Posted December 22, 2016 Share Posted December 22, 2016 3 minutes ago, ICEMAN! said: Trump will build the best nukes. Big beautiful tremendous nukes. He knows more about nukes than the nuclear scientists. He's going to make nukes great again. beautiful nukes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted December 22, 2016 Share Posted December 22, 2016 56 minutes ago, Skidooski said: Why.....Cause you have to keep up with the Joneses? We need more nukes until the world comes to it's senses about nukes? http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-38410027 You are smarter than this. Look at the quotes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted December 22, 2016 Share Posted December 22, 2016 Why? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T1R9sledder Posted December 22, 2016 Share Posted December 22, 2016 3 minutes ago, Mainecat said: Why? Read Z's BBC link.....It's a good read. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted December 22, 2016 Share Posted December 22, 2016 1 minute ago, T1R9sledder said: Read Z's BBC link.....It's a good read. you do realize 7000 nukes is 6000 too many right? 1000 could flatten the planet. Its sad many here didnt live during the cold war. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Skidooski Posted December 22, 2016 Author Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted December 22, 2016 14 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: well you're creating anti-trump threads, bashing trumpsters....what gives? Well....we don't need no more stinking nukes Can someone here please explain to me why we need more? Open mind and all ears Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spin_dry Posted December 22, 2016 Share Posted December 22, 2016 trump and putin like one another. why the need for more nukes? i don't get it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Skidooski Posted December 22, 2016 Author Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted December 22, 2016 Slinger, MC and Spin all have the same opinion as me. It's like the Twilight Zone Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T1R9sledder Posted December 22, 2016 Share Posted December 22, 2016 5 minutes ago, Mainecat said: you do realize 7000 nukes is 6000 too many right? 1000 could flatten the planet. Its sad many here didnt live during the cold war. No chit Sherlock.....we lived that era....... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T1R9sledder Posted December 22, 2016 Share Posted December 22, 2016 4 minutes ago, Skidooski said: Well....we don't need no more stinking nukes Can someone here please explain to me why we need more? Open mind and all ears We don't......modernize delivery systems is more likely. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spin_dry Posted December 22, 2016 Share Posted December 22, 2016 (edited) 11 minutes ago, Skidooski said: Slinger, MC and Spin all have the same opinion as me. It's like the Twilight Zone i'll try and think more like the other 97% of members here. i'll try very hard. i'll do it just for you. Edited December 22, 2016 by spin_dry Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Skidooski Posted December 22, 2016 Author Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted December 22, 2016 1 minute ago, spin_dry said: i try and think more like the other 97% of members here. i'll try very hard. i'll do it just for you. I just found myself agreeing with you in the Psychedelics thread too. Maybe I should log off and take a vacation Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICEMAN! Posted December 22, 2016 Share Posted December 22, 2016 13 minutes ago, T1R9sledder said: We don't......modernize delivery systems is more likely. Stealth nukes? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Skidooski Posted December 22, 2016 Author Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted December 22, 2016 (edited) 5 minutes ago, ICEMAN! said: Stealth nukes? I don't know the ins and outs of this but from my understanding we can't change or retrofit any of the ICBM's but we can take them offline and replace them with modern delivery systems. Total number shouldn't grow any higher. ??? The only work I'm aware of that's been done on the ICBM's is swapping out the solid fuel to make sure they still function and aren't inert. I just don't get why we would need "Greatly expand" on our nuclear weapons Edited December 22, 2016 by Skidooski Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted December 22, 2016 Share Posted December 22, 2016 Just now, Skidooski said: I don't know the ins and outs of this but from my understanding we can't change or retrofit any of the ICBM's but we can take them offline and replace them with modern delivery systems. Total number shouldn't grow any higher. ??? The only work that's been done on the ICBM's is swapping out the solid fuel to make sure they still function and aren't inert. I just don't get why we would need "Greatly expand" on our nuclear weapons "nuclear capabilities". You kind of answered it in this post. Relax. Don't get all "intellectually elite" just yet. They are pulling up a chair for you now...DO NOT SIT DOWN!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Skidooski Posted December 22, 2016 Author Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted December 22, 2016 4 minutes ago, Zambroski said: "nuclear capabilities". You kind of answered it in this post. Relax. Don't get all "intellectually elite" just yet. They are pulling up a chair for you now...DO NOT SIT DOWN!!!! OK....yeah I see the article references "nuclear arsenal" while his tweet said "nuclear capabilities". But still...."expand it's nuclear capabilities" does sound IMO like he's thinking on possibly increasing the over all amount. Either way why? We apparently have the second most in the world and between us and Russia we can kill off everyone so all semantics aside...why? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICEMAN! Posted December 22, 2016 Share Posted December 22, 2016 4 minutes ago, Skidooski said: OK....yeah I see the article references "nuclear arsenal" while his tweet said "nuclear capabilities". But still...."expand it's nuclear capabilities" does sound IMO like he's thinking on possibly increasing the over all amount. Either way why? We apparently have the second most in the world and between us and Russia we can kill off everyone so all semantics aside...why? There is no logical or good reason why. It's a complete waste of money. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member SnowRider Posted December 22, 2016 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted December 22, 2016 (edited) Small hands.... He's the American Kim Jong Un......small hands, fat, and insecure.... Edited December 22, 2016 by SnowRider Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted December 22, 2016 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted December 22, 2016 Its hilarious what you libs take seriously out of his mouth and what you don't. Its real entertainment. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.