Jump to content
Check your account email address ×

Tucker Carlson verifies the Nature article about Wuhan virus being from a lab


Recommended Posts

So it has absolutely nothing to do with the eating habits of the Chinese or the wet markets. Wow. Interesting stuff. This does overlap nicely with the article I posted about the woman bat researcher. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, ACE said:

Even if it came from a lab that doesn’t mean it’s nefarious in origin 

Exactly. Although it is totally irresponsible to have a lab studying infectious disease so clone to 60 million people though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, spin_dry said:

Exactly. Although it is totally irresponsible to have a lab studying infectious disease so clone to 60 million people though. 

It came from a level 2 lab not the level 4 lab  :) retard 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, spin_dry said:

You don’t even know what your saying anymore since Vince clipped your clawed fingers. :lol: 

What are you drooling on yourself about?  :guzzle: AFJCOCKBREATH

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
1 hour ago, ACE said:

Even if it came from a lab that doesn’t mean it’s nefarious in origin 

 

1 hour ago, spin_dry said:

Exactly. Although it is totally irresponsible to have a lab studying infectious disease so clone to 60 million people though. 

Well its quite "nefarious" keeping it quite and if it did come from the lab extremely nefarious as they knew exactly what they were dealing with then blame it on a wet market all the while leaving other countries in limbo for a few months.   

Edited by Highmark
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Momorider said:

What are you drooling on yourself about?  :guzzle: AFJCOCKBREATH

momo how are you satisfying your insatiable appetite for sniffing cock during the lockdown? 

Edited by frenchy
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ACE said:

Even if it came from a lab that doesn’t mean it’s nefarious in origin 

Right, just that the conditions to allow the virus to mutate were present in the lab.  Couple this with Chinese culture and government trying to hide problems and this seems more than reasonable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This also somewhat describes China's "move along, nothing to see here" approach to reporting on numbers of infections and deaths.  If it's the viral equivalent of Chernobyl, an accident, they want to do whatever they can to change the subject.

And it makes the whole argument of "this didn't come from a lab because of the genetics" a moot point.  It can come from a lab and not be a designer virus.  Labs house naturally-occurring viruses all the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Highmark said:

 

Well its quite "nefarious" keeping it quite and if it did come from the lab extremely nefarious as they knew exactly what they were dealing with then blame it on a wet market all the while leaving other countries in limbo for a few months.   

No

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, teamgreen02 said:

Right, just that the conditions to allow the virus to mutate were present in the lab.  Couple this with Chinese culture and government trying to hide problems and this seems more than reasonable.

How would a virus mutate is a lab? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, spin_dry said:

How would a virus mutate is a lab? 

Mutate would be the wrong word for it, just transferred to humans in the lab.  Who knows if we will ever know exactly how all this started.  If the Chinese knew they wouldn't tell us anyways.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, teamgreen02 said:

Mutate would be the wrong word for it, just transferred to humans in the lab.  Who knows if we will ever know exactly how all this started.  If the Chinese knew they wouldn't tell us anyways.

Yes. It’s really beginning to look like it’s very possible this is what happened. 
 

https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/01/wuhan-seafood-market-may-not-be-source-novel-virus-spreading-globally

1 hour ago, Matt said:

This also somewhat describes China's "move along, nothing to see here" approach to reporting on numbers of infections and deaths.  If it's the viral equivalent of Chernobyl, an accident, they want to do whatever they can to change the subject.

And it makes the whole argument of "this didn't come from a lab because of the genetics" a moot point.  It can come from a lab and not be a designer virus.  Labs house naturally-occurring viruses all the time.

That’s a good analogy. It’s looking more and more like this was a lab accident that not only went horribly wrong, but was covered up. The only possible explanation was that someone was infected from area where the bats reside and  traveled to Wuhan. This virus couldn’t have come from the market. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Ez ryder said:

then the world should go father China for the cost of this shit show . if it can be proved they knew and covered it up.  110% on the hook for the spread and related costs . 

China covered things up for weeks until Wuhan was at the breaking point and the social posts that snuck out of the great firewall drew international attention.  The media in this country has been going out of its way to praise China, not realizing that:

1) they lied like mofos from the beginning and tried to cover things up

2) they were untruthful with their reporting all along due to the high rate of failures of their tests

3) as soon as they kicked out the international press, their cases dramatically went to almost zero...

4) Taiwan knew all along what was going on, having sent an advance team of scientists into Wuhan days after hearing about mysterious pneumonia.  They pleaded to be allowed into the WHO in an advisory capacity (not even as an officially-recognized member state) and were soundly rejected due to political pressure from Beijing.  If Taiwan were allowed to tell the world what was coming, tens of thousands of lives could have been saved.

 

China cost the world economy probably $10T on this.  The WHO, which the US funds to a far greater extent than any other nation, was 100% complicit with the coverup.  China needs to be heavily sanctioned, and the WHO needs to be disbanded and revamped.  WHO is the medical equivalent of the League of Nations.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Matt said:

China covered things up for weeks until Wuhan was at the breaking point and the social posts that snuck out of the great firewall drew international attention.  The media in this country has been going out of its way to praise China, not realizing that:

1) they lied like mofos from the beginning and tried to cover things up

2) they were untruthful with their reporting all along due to the high rate of failures of their tests

3) as soon as they kicked out the international press, their cases dramatically went to almost zero...

4) Taiwan knew all along what was going on, having sent an advance team of scientists into Wuhan days after hearing about mysterious pneumonia.  They pleaded to be allowed into the WHO in an advisory capacity (not even as an officially-recognized member state) and were soundly rejected due to political pressure from Beijing.  If Taiwan were allowed to tell the world what was coming, tens of thousands of lives could have been saved.

 

China cost the world economy probably $10T on this.  The WHO, which the US funds to a far greater extent than any other nation, was 100% complicit with the coverup.  China needs to be heavily sanctioned, and the WHO needs to be disbanded and revamped.  WHO is the medical equivalent of the League of Nations.

Given that WHO is heavily funded by the US, I’d say the chilling effect trump’s attitude had on WHO also needs to be investigated. He fought against WHO’s evidence for weeks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, spin_dry said:

Given that WHO is heavily funded by the US, I’d say the chilling effect trump’s attitude had on WHO also needs to be investigated. He fought against WHO’s evidence for weeks. 

That's a funny way to frame it, given it was the WHO who was misleading the world about the extent and danger of this virus.  Like Matt said, the WHO has some serious explaining to do, as to why they keep covering for China.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol

×
×
  • Create New...