Jump to content
Check your account email address ×

I probably missed all the Trumpsters admitting they were wrong.


Recommended Posts

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/state-department-probe-of-clinton-emails-finds-no-deliberate-mishandling-of-classified-information/2019/10/18/83339446-f1dc-11e9-8693-f487e46784aa_story.html

 

That's ok, it was an awesome vacation.

How much crow did they eat?

Did they admit that they were stupid for voting for Crooked Donny?  

Did they feel stupid for thinking they should lock her up?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, revkevsdi said:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/state-department-probe-of-clinton-emails-finds-no-deliberate-mishandling-of-classified-information/2019/10/18/83339446-f1dc-11e9-8693-f487e46784aa_story.html

 

That's ok, it was an awesome vacation.

How much crow did they eat?

Did they admit that they were stupid for voting for Crooked Donny?  

Did they feel stupid for thinking they should lock her up?

 

Yeah but......  :lol: 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Zambroski said:

Poor BarbieHands.  

:lol:

 

I know you'd never admit you were wrong.  I've seen you get owned time and time again and still jump around like a retarded water boy thinking he scored a touch down. 

Edited by revkevsdi
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, revkevsdi said:

I know you'd never admit you were wrong.  I've seen you get owned time and time again and still jump around like a retarded water boy thinking he scored a touch down. 

You

are

so

stupid

and 

weak!

741FDCB5-89D2-4228-9F2C-E471FEB73581.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

""more than 30,000 deleted records""

 

A State Department report into former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server for government business, obtained by Fox News on Friday, found dozens of individuals at fault and hundreds of security violations.

The report summarized an administrative review of the handling of classified information relating to Clinton’s private email server used during her tenure as the nation’s highest-ranking diplomat between 2009 and 2013. The report, dated Sept. 13., was delivered to the office of Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa., who was chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee until last year.

The report reflected only approximately 30,000 emails that the State Department was able to physically review, and found 38 individuals were responsible for 91 violations.

Another 497 violations were also found, although the report was not able to assign responsibility in those cases, in part because many of those involved had already left the department during the time it took to receive the emails and review them.

 

The report described an investigation fraught with obstacles -- including delays -- employees who left the department and more than 30,000 deleted records.

The Clinton email controversy dogged her throughout her failed 2016 presidential bid. Clinton and her aides have claimed the controversy was overblown and denied any wrongdoing, but President Trump and allies have consistently referred back to it as an example of a criminal endeavor for which no one was properly punished.

The FBI began investigating Clinton’s handling of emails in 2015 after it was revealed she had used a homebrew server for her government emails. Then-FBI Director James Comey announced in July 2016 that the agency would not recommend charges, but famously described Clinton as having been "extremely careless" in her conduct.

The department received the emails in December 2014, well after Clinton left the department in early 2013.

The department concluded that the use of a private email system “added an increased degree of risk of compromise, as a private system lacks the network monitoring and intrusion detection capabilities of [the] State Department.”

“While the use of a private email system itself did not necessarily increase the likelihood of classified information being transmitted on unclassified systems, those incidents which then resulted in the presence of classified information upon it carried an increased risk of compromise or inadvertent disclosure,” the report said.

However, while there were instances of classified information being introduced into an unclassified system, the report said that by and large the individuals interviewed “did their best” to implement security policies. There was no “persuasive evidence” of systemic, deliberate mishandling of classified information, according to the report.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, XCR1250 said:

""more than 30,000 deleted records""

 

A State Department report into former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server for government business, obtained by Fox News on Friday, found dozens of individuals at fault and hundreds of security violations.

The report summarized an administrative review of the handling of classified information relating to Clinton’s private email server used during her tenure as the nation’s highest-ranking diplomat between 2009 and 2013. The report, dated Sept. 13., was delivered to the office of Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa., who was chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee until last year.

The report reflected only approximately 30,000 emails that the State Department was able to physically review, and found 38 individuals were responsible for 91 violations.

Another 497 violations were also found, although the report was not able to assign responsibility in those cases, in part because many of those involved had already left the department during the time it took to receive the emails and review them.

 

The report described an investigation fraught with obstacles -- including delays -- employees who left the department and more than 30,000 deleted records.

The Clinton email controversy dogged her throughout her failed 2016 presidential bid. Clinton and her aides have claimed the controversy was overblown and denied any wrongdoing, but President Trump and allies have consistently referred back to it as an example of a criminal endeavor for which no one was properly punished.

The FBI began investigating Clinton’s handling of emails in 2015 after it was revealed she had used a homebrew server for her government emails. Then-FBI Director James Comey announced in July 2016 that the agency would not recommend charges, but famously described Clinton as having been "extremely careless" in her conduct.

The department received the emails in December 2014, well after Clinton left the department in early 2013.

The department concluded that the use of a private email system “added an increased degree of risk of compromise, as a private system lacks the network monitoring and intrusion detection capabilities of [the] State Department.”

“While the use of a private email system itself did not necessarily increase the likelihood of classified information being transmitted on unclassified systems, those incidents which then resulted in the presence of classified information upon it carried an increased risk of compromise or inadvertent disclosure,” the report said.

However, while there were instances of classified information being introduced into an unclassified system, the report said that by and large the individuals interviewed “did their best” to implement security policies. There was no “persuasive evidence” of systemic, deliberate mishandling of classified information, according to the report.

How much did this investigation cost? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lets remember something that XCR1250 brought up yesterday:  THE DEMOCRAT PARTY IS MADE UP OF LAWYERS.

 

Every Democrat presidential nominee since 1984 went to law school (although Gore did not graduate).

 

Every Democrat vice presidential nominee since 1976, except for Lloyd Bentsen, went to law school.

 

Barack Obama was a lawyer. Michelle Obama was a lawyer.

Hillary Clinton was a lawyer. Bill Clinton was a lawyer.

John Edwards is a lawyer. Elizabeth Edwards was a lawyer.

 

Look at leaders of the Democrat Party in Congress:

Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer is a lawyer. 

Ex-Senator Harry Reid is a lawyer.

 

The Republican Party is different.

 

President Trump is a businessman. 

President Bush 1 and 2 were businessmen.

Vice President Cheney is a businessman.
President Eisenhower was a 5 star General Officer.

The leaders of the Republican Revolution:

Newt Gingrich was a history professor.

Tom Delay was an exterminator.

Dick Armey was an economist.

Ex-House Minority Leader Boehner was a plastic manufacturer.

The former Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist is a heart surgeon

 

Who was the last Republican president who was a lawyer?

Gerald Ford, who left office 31 years ago and who barely won the Republican nomination as a sitting president, running against actor Ronald Reagan in 1976.

 

The Republican Party is made up of real people doing real work, who are often the targets of lawyers.

 

This is very interesting. I never thought about it this way.

 

The Democrat Party is made up of lawyers.

 

Democrats mock and scorn men who create wealth, like Trump, Bush and Cheney, or who heal the sick like Frist, or who immerse themselves in history like Gingrich.

The Lawyers Party sees these sorts of people, who provide goods and services that people want, as the enemies of America ..

And, so we have seen the procession of official enemies, in the eyes of the Lawyers Party, grow.

 

Against whom do Hillary and Obama rail?...Pharmaceutical companies, oil companies, hospitals, manufacturers, fast food restaurant chains, large retail businesses, bankers, and anyone producing anything of value in our nation.

This is the natural consequence of viewing everything through the eyes of lawyers.

 

Lawyers solve problems by successfully representing their clients, in this case the American people. Lawyers seek to have new laws passed, they seek to win lawsuits, they press appellate courts to overturn precedent, and lawyers always parse language to favor their side.

 

Confined to the narrow practice of law, that is fine. But it is an awful way to govern a great nation.

 

When politicians, as lawyers, begin to view some Americans as clients and other Americans as opposing parties, then the role of the legal system in our life becomes all-consuming.

Some Americans become adverse parties of our very government. We are not all litigants in some vast social class-action suit.

We are citizens of a republic that promises us a great deal of freedom from laws, from courts, and from lawyers.

 

Today, we are drowning in laws; we are contorted by judicial decisions; we are driven to distraction by omnipresent lawyers in all parts of our once private lives.

America has a place for laws and lawyers, but that place is modest and reasonable, not vast and unchecked.

When the most important decision for our next president is whom he will appoint to the Supreme Court, the role of lawyers and the law in America is too big.

When House Democrats sue America in order to hamstring our efforts to learn what our enemies are planning to do to us, then the role of litigation in America has become crushing.

 

Perhaps Americans will understand that change cannot be brought to our nation by those lawyers who already largely dictate American society and business.

Perhaps Americans will see that hope does not come from the mouths of lawyers but from personal dreams nourished by hard work.

Perhaps Americans will embrace the truth that more lawyers with more power will only make our problems worse.

 

The  United States has 5% of the world's population and 66% of the world's lawyers!  

Tort (Legal) reform legislation has been introduced in congress several times in the last several years to limit punitive damages in ridiculous lawsuits such as spilling hot coffee on yourself and suing the establishment that sold it to you and also to limit punitive damages in huge medical malpractice lawsuits.

This legislation has continually been blocked from even being voted on by the Democrat Party.

 

When you see that  97% of the political contributions from the American Trial Lawyers Association go to the Democrat Party, then you realize who is responsible for our medical and product costs being so high.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, racer254 said:

Lets remember something that XCR1250 brought up yesterday:  THE DEMOCRAT PARTY IS MADE UP OF LAWYERS.

 

Every Democrat presidential nominee since 1984 went to law school (although Gore did not graduate).

 

Every Democrat vice presidential nominee since 1976, except for Lloyd Bentsen, went to law school.

 

Barack Obama was a lawyer. Michelle Obama was a lawyer.

Hillary Clinton was a lawyer. Bill Clinton was a lawyer.

John Edwards is a lawyer. Elizabeth Edwards was a lawyer.

 

Look at leaders of the Democrat Party in Congress:

Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer is a lawyer. 

Ex-Senator Harry Reid is a lawyer.

 

The Republican Party is different.

 

President Trump is a businessman. 

President Bush 1 and 2 were businessmen.

Vice President Cheney is a businessman.
President Eisenhower was a 5 star General Officer.

The leaders of the Republican Revolution:

Newt Gingrich was a history professor.

Tom Delay was an exterminator.

Dick Armey was an economist.

Ex-House Minority Leader Boehner was a plastic manufacturer.

The former Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist is a heart surgeon

 

Who was the last Republican president who was a lawyer?

Gerald Ford, who left office 31 years ago and who barely won the Republican nomination as a sitting president, running against actor Ronald Reagan in 1976.

 

The Republican Party is made up of real people doing real work, who are often the targets of lawyers.

 

This is very interesting. I never thought about it this way.

 

The Democrat Party is made up of lawyers.

 

Democrats mock and scorn men who create wealth, like Trump, Bush and Cheney, or who heal the sick like Frist, or who immerse themselves in history like Gingrich.

The Lawyers Party sees these sorts of people, who provide goods and services that people want, as the enemies of America ..

And, so we have seen the procession of official enemies, in the eyes of the Lawyers Party, grow.

 

Against whom do Hillary and Obama rail?...Pharmaceutical companies, oil companies, hospitals, manufacturers, fast food restaurant chains, large retail businesses, bankers, and anyone producing anything of value in our nation.

This is the natural consequence of viewing everything through the eyes of lawyers.

 

Lawyers solve problems by successfully representing their clients, in this case the American people. Lawyers seek to have new laws passed, they seek to win lawsuits, they press appellate courts to overturn precedent, and lawyers always parse language to favor their side.

 

Confined to the narrow practice of law, that is fine. But it is an awful way to govern a great nation.

 

When politicians, as lawyers, begin to view some Americans as clients and other Americans as opposing parties, then the role of the legal system in our life becomes all-consuming.

Some Americans become adverse parties of our very government. We are not all litigants in some vast social class-action suit.

We are citizens of a republic that promises us a great deal of freedom from laws, from courts, and from lawyers.

 

Today, we are drowning in laws; we are contorted by judicial decisions; we are driven to distraction by omnipresent lawyers in all parts of our once private lives.

America has a place for laws and lawyers, but that place is modest and reasonable, not vast and unchecked.

When the most important decision for our next president is whom he will appoint to the Supreme Court, the role of lawyers and the law in America is too big.

When House Democrats sue America in order to hamstring our efforts to learn what our enemies are planning to do to us, then the role of litigation in America has become crushing.

 

Perhaps Americans will understand that change cannot be brought to our nation by those lawyers who already largely dictate American society and business.

Perhaps Americans will see that hope does not come from the mouths of lawyers but from personal dreams nourished by hard work.

Perhaps Americans will embrace the truth that more lawyers with more power will only make our problems worse.

 

The  United States has 5% of the world's population and 66% of the world's lawyers!  

Tort (Legal) reform legislation has been introduced in congress several times in the last several years to limit punitive damages in ridiculous lawsuits such as spilling hot coffee on yourself and suing the establishment that sold it to you and also to limit punitive damages in huge medical malpractice lawsuits.

This legislation has continually been blocked from even being voted on by the Democrat Party.

 

When you see that  97% of the political contributions from the American Trial Lawyers Association go to the Democrat Party, then you realize who is responsible for our medical and product costs being so high.

Nobody read all of that. Not even you. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, spin_dry said:

How much did this investigation cost? 

 

Read the last paragraph. 

Remember when Trump lied and said he was exonerated?

This is what that looks like. 

On the other hand you don’t care about the 22 million Bush/Cheney era emails that went missing. You know during the time the lied and went to war.  They also used private servers.  

Math tip. 22 million is more than 30,000. 

Also Hillary’s emails were recovered.  Not so much with the crooked Republicans. 

Check this out and see if you notice anything. 

As in Clinton’s case, the Bush administration e-mails were sought as evidence in government investigations. No no charges were filed and no criminal wrongdoing was found in regard to Clinton’s handling of e-mails. Bush aides were found in contempt of Congress for not complying with subpoenas in the U.S. attorney firings investigation, but no punishment was handed down.

 

but but her emails...  Republicans supporters are the dumbest people on the planet. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, revkevsdi said:

 

Read the last paragraph. 

Remember when Trump lied and said he was exonerated?

This is what that looks like. 

On the other hand you don’t care about the 22 million Bush/Cheney era emails that went missing. You know during the time the lied and went to war.  They also used private servers.  

Math tip. 22 million is more than 30,000. 

Also Hillary’s emails were recovered.  Not so much with the crooked Republicans. 

Check this out and see if you notice anything. 

As in Clinton’s case, the Bush administration e-mails were sought as evidence in government investigations. No no charges were filed and no criminal wrongdoing was found in regard to Clinton’s handling of e-mails. Bush aides were found in contempt of Congress for not complying with subpoenas in the U.S. attorney firings investigation, but no punishment was handed down.

 

but but her emails...  Republicans supporters are the dumbest people on the planet. 

Pro Tip. Trump is going nowhere for 5 plus more years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, revkevsdi said:

Your meltdown will be interesting when they lock him up. 

My meltdown?  I’m more concerned about the guys who are starting 15-20 threads a day, and what they’ll do when he gets re elected.  Hope they can somehow carry on.  You’re hallucinating if you think he’s getting locked up or even removed from office.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, revkevsdi said:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/state-department-probe-of-clinton-emails-finds-no-deliberate-mishandling-of-classified-information/2019/10/18/83339446-f1dc-11e9-8693-f487e46784aa_story.html

 

That's ok, it was an awesome vacation.

How much crow did they eat?

Did they admit that they were stupid for voting for Crooked Donny?  

Did they feel stupid for thinking they should lock her up?

 

No need to “feel” they’re stupid.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, DriftBusta said:

My meltdown?  I’m more concerned about the guys who are starting 15-20 threads a day, and what they’ll do when he gets re elected.  Hope they can somehow carry on.  You’re hallucinating if you think he’s getting locked up or even removed from office.

Yeah you are right.  You’ve always said that the constitution was just a suggestion. 

http://politicaledu.org/2017/05/22/impeach-trump/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Too funny.    Detroit Mayor gets caught giving contracts to a woman he is banging on the side.   Staff gets caught destroying E-mails and now Mayor vows to send them to training to learn not to destroy evidence of wrongdoing.  :lol:

 

705F08ED-213C-4C23-8768-5ED6679629A6.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, DriftBusta said:

My meltdown?  I’m more concerned about the guys who are starting 15-20 threads a day, and what they’ll do when he gets re elected.  Hope they can somehow carry on.  You’re hallucinating if you think he’s getting locked up or even removed from office.

If The House votes to Impeach the Senate will simply ignore the House, same as what happened with B.Clinton.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol

×
×
  • Create New...