Platinum Contributing Member Skidooski Posted October 18, 2016 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted October 18, 2016 (edited) 2 hours ago, Zambroski said: HOLY SHIT! SR to his Lib-tard idiots friends: "Please be my friend....I'll defend you here" He's one dumbass parrot that's for sure. He's one of those, If I keep saying it over and over it must be true, types of morons. Edited October 18, 2016 by Skidooski 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
racer254 Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 2 minutes ago, Skidooski said: He's one dumbass parrot that's for sure. He's on of those, If I keep saying it over and over it must be true, types of morons. Alinsky tactics. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 2 hours ago, 1trailmaker said: interesting statement 2000 Republicans won over Democrats because the people prospered and economy was at its peak 2008 Democrats won over Republicans because the people were poor, economy in worst shape since the 1930's 2016 does this mean the people have prospered and will vote Republican now? That is the difference - Was that what you meant I thought you didn't get a raise in over 12 years, with the Ontario Liberals in charge. Was that what you meant. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1trailmaker Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 1 hour ago, ArcticCrusher said: I thought you didn't get a raise in over 12 years, with the Ontario Liberals in charge. Was that what you meant. come on AC try to keep up - 8 years under Conservatives and only 4 under Liberals Anyway he made the statement and I thought it was funny Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 14 minutes ago, 1trailmaker said: come on AC try to keep up - 8 years under Conservatives and only 4 under Liberals Anyway he made the statement and I thought it was funny Come on Trail, Obama has had the slowest growth of any POTUS on record. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1jkw Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 3 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said: Come on Trail, Obama has had the slowest growth of any POTUS on record. Yes following the worst economic meltdown since the depression, far greater mortgage regulations, and a worldwide economic slowdown, and a strong US Dollar. I am an American and I can tell you things are far better at 7 3/4 years in with Obama, than 7 3/4 years in with W. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Momorider Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 2 minutes ago, 1jkw said: Yes following the worst economic meltdown since the depression, far greater mortgage regulations, and a worldwide economic slowdown, and a strong US Dollar. I am an American and I can tell you things are far better at 7 3/4 years in with Obama, than 7 3/4 years in with W. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 (edited) 11 minutes ago, 1jkw said: Yes following the worst economic meltdown since the depression, far greater mortgage regulations, and a worldwide economic slowdown, and a strong US Dollar. I am an American and I can tell you things are far better at 7 3/4 years in with Obama, than 7 3/4 years in with W. Fail did not seem to care about that when he took the same shots at our former PM. Its an inside thing. On the second bold, it would depend if you are better off or not. The 10 trillion debt added will be Obama's legacy. On the slow growth, look around, its the new norm. Neither Hillary or Trump is going to change that. Edited October 18, 2016 by ArcticCrusher Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
racer254 Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 (edited) 14 minutes ago, 1jkw said: Yes following the worst economic meltdown since the depression, far greater mortgage regulations, and a worldwide economic slowdown, and a strong US Dollar. I am an American and I can tell you things are far better at 7 3/4 years in with Obama, than 7 3/4 years in with W. Why do you use W as the metric? In case you missed it, voters didn't want another bush as a candidate and clinton was in washington during the same years that you are comparing. Edited October 18, 2016 by racer254 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1trailmaker Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 46 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said: Come on Trail, Obama has had the slowest growth of any POTUS on record. He made the statement not me, if you are going to say the economy was great when obama got office and wasn't good when Bush got office then fine - clueless but fine I am good with your opinion Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Momorider Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ebsell Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 1 hour ago, Momorider said: You're an idiot if you think Bush never ran the economy to the brink of collapse when he was POTUS 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kev144 Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ebsell Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 34 minutes ago, Kev144 said: Remind you of anyone? I'm sure many are fake but where there is smoke there is fire. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 Just now, Ebsell said: Remind you of anyone? I'm sure many are fake but where there is smoke there is fire. No, no...no! Hillary said it. "There's a lot of smoke...just no fire." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ebsell Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 3 minutes ago, Zambroski said: No, no...no! Hillary said it. "There's a lot of smoke...just no fire." LMAO the White House will burn to the ground Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 1 hour ago, 1trailmaker said: He made the statement not me, if you are going to say the economy was great when obama got office and wasn't good when Bush got office then fine - clueless but fine I am good with your opinion What I am saying is it does not matter if there was a deficit or surplus when the 2008 recession came, cause it was all going negative. Obama currently has almost a 600 billion deficit. Canada's numbers looking better and better every day now, well not for long. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1jkw Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 2 hours ago, racer254 said: Why do you use W as the metric? In case you missed it, voters didn't want another bush as a candidate and clinton was in washington during the same years that you are comparing. Because he was the president for the previous 8 years. I didn't miss it but I think you did, the reason nobody wanted another bush was because of W, the wars, the record high gas prices, the lies told to get us into the war in Iraq, the economic collapse to name a few. And not that I'm defending her but Clinton wasn't the president. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
racer254 Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 3 minutes ago, 1jkw said: Because he was the president for the previous 8 years. I didn't miss it but I think you did, the reason nobody wanted another bush was because of W, the wars, the record high gas prices, the lies told to get us into the war in Iraq, the economic collapse to name a few. And not that I'm defending her but Clinton wasn't the president. Yeah, I think you did miss it. Conservatives are getting rid of the republicans of that era. Most do not represent us and they are slowly being removed, unlike democrats who voted for the war in iraq. Democrats want to put one of them in the White House. How absurd is that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1jkw Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 2 hours ago, ArcticCrusher said: Fail did not seem to care about that when he took the same shots at our former PM. Its an inside thing. On the second bold, it would depend if you are better off or not. The 10 trillion debt added will be Obama's legacy. On the slow growth, look around, its the new norm. Neither Hillary or Trump is going to change that. Actually not one person I know wouldn't say they are better off now, heating oil, gasoline, and diesel fuel are half the price now compared to before, the stock market is up, home values up, and after many years wages ticked up, the dollar is strong. The 10 trillion is a huge problem, as was the 10.6 trillion and the interest on that 10.6 trillion Obama inherited, as the costs of the wars Obama inherited. I believe it was proven that 1/2 of the US debt by 2019 will be from the wars and the tax cuts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted October 18, 2016 Author Share Posted October 18, 2016 (edited) 6 minutes ago, racer254 said: Yeah, I think you did miss it. Conservatives are getting rid of the republicans of that era. Most do not represent us and they are slowly being removed, unlike democrats who voted for the war in iraq. Democrats want to put one of them in the White House. How absurd is that? you fool no one. you were supporting damn near every rw whacko who was making noise in the primaries, not to mention all the other whackos in state matters. give it a rest dipshit. Edited October 18, 2016 by Snoslinger Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1jkw Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 5 minutes ago, racer254 said: Yeah, I think you did miss it. Conservatives are getting rid of the republicans of that era. Most do not represent us and they are slowly being removed, unlike democrats who voted for the war in iraq. Democrats want to put one of them in the White House. How absurd is that? Given what not only the dems but the rest of the American people were fed and withheld by W's admin. it's not surprising people supported the war. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted October 18, 2016 Author Share Posted October 18, 2016 see what I mean 1jkw? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Momorider Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 2 minutes ago, 1jkw said: Actually not one person I know wouldn't say they are better off now, heating oil, gasoline, and diesel fuel are half the price now compared to before, the stock market is up, home values up, and after many years wages ticked up, the dollar is strong. The 10 trillion is a huge problem, as was the 10.6 trillion and the interest on that 10.6 trillion Obama inherited, as the costs of the wars Obama inherited. I believe it was proven that 1/2 of the US debt by 2019 will be from the wars and the tax cuts. all this fucking dupe fraud posts Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edmo Posted October 18, 2016 Share Posted October 18, 2016 2 minutes ago, 1jkw said: Actually not one person I know wouldn't say they are better off now, heating oil, gasoline, and diesel fuel are half the price now compared to before, the stock market is up, home values up, and after many years wages ticked up, the dollar is strong. The 10 trillion is a huge problem, as was the 10.6 trillion and the interest on that 10.6 trillion Obama inherited, as the costs of the wars Obama inherited. I believe it was proven that 1/2 of the US debt by 2019 will be from the wars and the tax cuts. So to continue the wars and killing brown people and innocents was/is the right thing to do? Not much has changed. Without any real ideas he's just continued the same foreign policy stupidity. Obama has blood on his hands as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.