jtssrx Posted June 20, 2019 Share Posted June 20, 2019 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted June 20, 2019 Share Posted June 20, 2019 That glacier is a racist. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
F3600 Posted June 20, 2019 Share Posted June 20, 2019 Yeah, but the climate change that was going to destroy it is now the climate change that is growing it, which is the new climate change and more man made than the previous climate change. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Momorider Posted June 20, 2019 Share Posted June 20, 2019 32 minutes ago, F3600 said: Yeah, but the climate change that was going to destroy it is now the climate change that is growing it, which is the new climate change and more man made than the previous climate change. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted June 20, 2019 Share Posted June 20, 2019 LaNealsha got straight fucking PWND Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jtssrx Posted June 20, 2019 Author Share Posted June 20, 2019 29 minutes ago, f7ben said: LaNealsha got straight fucking PWND What's crazy is there are multiple examples with the single glacier that scientists have claimed it would be gone that have been proven to be wrong. Yet no one calls them on these predictions failing and people like Neal just double and triple down on the climate change rhetoric. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
irv Posted June 20, 2019 Share Posted June 20, 2019 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted June 20, 2019 Share Posted June 20, 2019 11 minutes ago, jtssrx said: What's crazy is there are multiple examples with the single glacier that scientists have claimed it would be gone that have been proven to be wrong. Yet no one calls them on these predictions failing and people like Neal just double and triple down on the climate change rhetoric. I never claimed when any glaciers would be gone... Neal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jtssrx Posted June 20, 2019 Author Share Posted June 20, 2019 Just now, NaturallyAspirated said: I never claimed when any glaciers would be gone... Neal Quote people like Neal just double and triple down on the climate change rhetoric. Does that say you said the Glaciers would be gone? No, it says you double and triple down on climate change. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted June 20, 2019 Share Posted June 20, 2019 1 minute ago, jtssrx said: Does that say you said the Glaciers would be gone? No, it says you double and triple down on climate change. That's idiotic blather that makes no sense. Do you have an example of doubling down? Do you have an example of tripling down? Neal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jtssrx Posted June 20, 2019 Author Share Posted June 20, 2019 Just now, NaturallyAspirated said: That's idiotic blather that makes no sense. Do you have an example of doubling down? Do you have an example of tripling down? Neal Yes no matter what prediction fails to come true like this one you still stand on the hill that man causes the climate change. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted June 20, 2019 Share Posted June 20, 2019 4 minutes ago, jtssrx said: Yes no matter what prediction fails to come true like this one you still stand on the hill that man causes the climate change. Man does cause the climate to change, that isn't seriously contested by any rational person. It also isn't a doubling or tripling down as you previously stated. Again, do you have any examples of doubling or tripling down? Neal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jtssrx Posted June 20, 2019 Author Share Posted June 20, 2019 Just now, NaturallyAspirated said: Man does cause the climate to change, that isn't seriously contested by any rational person. It also isn't a doubling or tripling down as you previously stated. Again, do you have any examples of doubling or tripling down? Neal You have no measure to prove your claim and every I repeat every claim made by you and people like you has failed to come true. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted June 20, 2019 Share Posted June 20, 2019 (edited) 5 minutes ago, jtssrx said: You have no measure to prove your claim and every I repeat every claim made by you and people like you has failed to come true. I have not made any claims, you outright lie when you state such. Again, do you have an example of doubling or tripling down? Perhaps you should just admit you fucked up and we're wrong... Neal Edited June 20, 2019 by NaturallyAspirated Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted June 20, 2019 Share Posted June 20, 2019 35 minutes ago, jtssrx said: What's crazy is there are multiple examples with the single glacier that scientists have claimed it would be gone that have been proven to be wrong. Yet no one calls them on these predictions failing and people like Neal just double and triple down on the climate change rhetoric. Because they keep changing the narrative and making excuses for why they’ve been so wrong for so long Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted June 20, 2019 Share Posted June 20, 2019 9 minutes ago, NaturallyAspirated said: Man does cause the climate to change, that isn't seriously contested by any rational person. It also isn't a doubling or tripling down as you previously stated. Again, do you have any examples of doubling or tripling down? Neal To what degree though Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
irv Posted June 20, 2019 Share Posted June 20, 2019 1 minute ago, DUMPY said: To what degree though Now you'll get scientists say this, scientists say that rhetoric. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XC.Morrison Posted June 20, 2019 Share Posted June 20, 2019 6 minutes ago, jtssrx said: You have no measure to prove your claim and every I repeat every claim made by you and people like you has failed to come true. Not really. CO2 continues to climb 2-3ppm per year in the atmosphere just as predicted. Increased CO2 causes an increase in the sun's radiative forcing. CO2 was 280 ppm in the 1800's. We're at 415 ppm now. Humans did that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted June 20, 2019 Share Posted June 20, 2019 1 minute ago, XC.Morrison said: Not really. CO2 continues to climb 2-3ppm per year in the atmosphere just as predicted. Increased CO2 causes an increase in the sun's radiative forcing. CO2 was 280 ppm in the 1800's. We're at 415 ppm now. Humans did that. And how much of that contributes to current warming, and why are we currently cooling Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
irv Posted June 20, 2019 Share Posted June 20, 2019 1 minute ago, XC.Morrison said: Not really. CO2 continues to climb 2-3ppm per year in the atmosphere just as predicted. Increased CO2 causes an increase in the sun's radiative forcing. CO2 was 280 ppm in the 1800's. We're at 415 ppm now. Humans did that. But yet they pump C02 into greenhouses because it increases plant growth. Let alone the fact that it's essential to life. https://dutchgreenhouses.com/technology/co2-enrichment Carbon dioxide (CO2) is an essential component of photosynthesis (also called carbon assimilation). Photosynthesis is a chemical process that uses light energy to convert CO2 and water into sugars in green plants. These sugars are then used for growth within the plant, through respiration. The difference between the rate of photosynthesis and the rate of respiration is the basis for dry-matter accumulation (growth) in the plant. In greenhouse production the aim of all growers is to increase dry-matter content and economically optimize crop yield. CO2 increases productivity through improved plant growth and vigour. Some ways in which productivity is increased by CO2 include earlier flowering, higher fruit yields, reduced bud abortion in roses, improved stem strength and flower size. Growers should regard CO2 as a nutrient. http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/crops/facts/00-077.htm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XC.Morrison Posted June 20, 2019 Share Posted June 20, 2019 1 minute ago, DUMPY said: And how much of that contributes to current warming, and why are we currently cooling It contributes 126%. Sounds goofy right? More than 100%, how can that be? Do some research dude, I'm not gonna sit here all did and spoon feed ya. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jtssrx Posted June 20, 2019 Author Share Posted June 20, 2019 Just now, XC.Morrison said: Not really. CO2 continues to climb 2-3ppm per year in the atmosphere just as predicted. Increased CO2 causes an increase in the sun's radiative forcing. CO2 was 280 ppm in the 1800's. We're at 415 ppm now. Humans did that. You can't prove Humans have caused C02 to rise from 280 to 415. You do understand plants let off C02 and the earth is currently covered with my vegetation than it has ever been covered by. The temperature hasn't risen at any rate compared to the rate of rise of C02 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jtssrx Posted June 20, 2019 Author Share Posted June 20, 2019 (edited) C02 does not cause climate change. The one and only reason the powers that be claim it does is they can assign a carbon footprint to each living being be a person or an animal. Then they can tax the fuck out of you for simply living and breathing. Edited June 20, 2019 by jtssrx Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
irv Posted June 20, 2019 Share Posted June 20, 2019 Just now, XC.Morrison said: It contributes 126%. Sounds goofy right? More than 100%, how can that be? Do some research dude, I'm not gonna sit here all did and spoon feed ya. Gut hooked into believing C02 is bad. Personally, I think it is cow farts. we have to eliminate cows immediately!!!! 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted June 20, 2019 Share Posted June 20, 2019 10 minutes ago, DUMPY said: To what degree though That's debatable. Let's engage in conversation. Neal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.