Jump to content
Check your account email address ×

No collusion folks...


Recommended Posts

Other than that insane, clueless  comment, she seems OK. like trumpy and his cronies are going to be non-partisan :lol:

id say she shouldn’t be qualified based on lack of common sense alone. I want a fighter, not more of this “high road “ bullshit

Edited by Snoslinger
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Snoslinger said:

Other than that insane, clueless  comment, she seems OK. like trumpy and his cronies are going to be non-partisan :lol:

id say she shouldn’t be qualified based on lack of common sense alone. I want a fighter, not more of this “high road “ bullshit

Its over. Time to move on. :bc: 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Snoslinger said:

Other than that insane, clueless  comment, she seems OK. like trumpy and his cronies are going to be non-partisan :lol:

id say she shouldn’t be qualified based on lack of common sense alone. I want a fighter, not more of this “high road “ bullshit

That's why she is running for President and you waste your talent here.

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
25 minutes ago, NaturallyAspirated said:

Dems will miss the boat again with her.

 

Neal

 

18 minutes ago, Snoslinger said:

Other than that insane, clueless  comment, she seems OK. like trumpy and his cronies are going to be non-partisan :lol:

id say she shouldn’t be qualified based on lack of common sense alone. I want a fighter, not more of this “high road “ bullshit

 

17 minutes ago, Snoslinger said:

She probably thinks she’s going to acquire some trumpster votes with that shit

Neal nails it^^^^^^

I've been a Tulsi proponent for awhile now...she is good.

Edited by Jimmy Snacks
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perfectly summarizes Slinger:

The Howard Bealeization, or Glenn Beckifaction, of Rachel Maddow is a reminder that partisan paranoia has bipartisan appeal. Maddow is right to question the summarizing of a 300ish-page report into four measly pages, to insist on transparency, to challenge the motives of the Trump-friendly AG—and she’s not alone in doing so. But for Maddow, every piece of information remains a clue that might take down the Trump empire. There is no adjustment for how the report has been widely received, no skepticism about what the report might actually contain, just cockamamie connections, the feverish belief that every single thing we don’t know is the all-important fact, that the smoking gun of collusion is out there, and that, yes, Robert Mueller is still going to swoop in and save us…

I’ll admit that I haven’t watched Maddow regularly for the past few years. Turning on her show this week was like discovering a Facebook friend is on the verge of a nervous breakdown. She looks the same as she did, she even sounds the same, but 15 minutes into a conspiratorial rant with no sense of proportion or, honestly, responsibility, you realize that something has gone wildly wrong: She wants to believe the instantly impeachable truth is out there more than she wants the truth, as gnarly and corrupt as it is. It’s easy to understand why this might appeal to the 4 million or so Trump-sick viewers who regularly watch Maddow’s program, but her audience is being served an alt-reality just as surely as Hannity’s is. If her audience of susceptible ostriches and amateur detectives, people who bury themselves in conspiratorial details hoping to unearth the one clue that will beam us out of this reality, is not as malignant as Fox’s audience of the hateful, aggrieved, and ignorant, in this one regard at least, what’s happening between MSNBC and Fox is not a contest: More than one cable news host can disserve their audience at a time.

 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, AKIQPilot said:

Yep. Dipshits like slinger have to much pride to actually put this behind them and mone on. 

No... too much emotional attachment to a failed prophecy.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, AKIQPilot said:

Its over. Time to move on. :bc: 

No it isn’t.  It’s time to out the perpetrators of one of the largest frauds and divisive issues on the American people in history and put them in jail for a long time.  Then we can move on.    :bc: 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, DriftBusta said:

No it isn’t.  It’s time to out the perpetrators of one of the largest frauds and divisive issues on the American people in history and put them in jail for a long time.  Then we can move on.    :bc: 

:lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol

×
×
  • Create New...