Capt.Storm Posted September 10, 2016 Share Posted September 10, 2016 1 minute ago, f7ben said: is your rpm gauge showing you revolutions of the fucking track or of the motor ....good god dude you don't get it! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capt.Storm Posted September 10, 2016 Share Posted September 10, 2016 4 minutes ago, smokin george said: A truck running at 2150 rpm with a 10x22.5 tire and then switched over to a 12x22.5 runs 12mp/h faster at the same rpm. It strange how that happens it's because of the circumference to axis ratio. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted September 10, 2016 Author Share Posted September 10, 2016 5 minutes ago, smokin george said: A truck running at 2150 rpm with a 10x22.5 tire and then switched over to a 12x22.5 runs 12mp/h faster at the same rpm. It strange how that happens A track is not a tire .....it will take more RPM's of the motor to cause 1 full revolution of a longer track .....geesh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted September 10, 2016 Author Share Posted September 10, 2016 Just now, Capt.Storm said: it's because of the circumference to axis ratio. you cannot think of a track like a tire ....you have to think of it like a conveyor Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capt.Storm Posted September 10, 2016 Share Posted September 10, 2016 1 minute ago, f7ben said: you cannot think of a track like a tire ....you have to think of it like a conveyor the longer a conveyor is the more feet per minute it travels at a given rpm..that should help you see you are wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted September 10, 2016 Author Share Posted September 10, 2016 3 minutes ago, Capt.Storm said: the longer a conveyor is the more feet per minute it travels at a given rpm..that should help you see you are wrong. is the rpm gauge on a sled measuring track revolutions or engine revolutions ....sweet fuck are you a moron Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capt.Storm Posted September 10, 2016 Share Posted September 10, 2016 Just now, f7ben said: is the rpm gauge on a sled measuring track revolutions or engine revolutions ....sweet fuck are you a moron measuring the motors rpm..but there is that final drive deal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted September 10, 2016 Share Posted September 10, 2016 5 minutes ago, Capt.Storm said: the longer a conveyor is the more feet per minute it travels at a given rpm..that should help you see you are wrong. The final speed of a conveyor is usually governed by the diameter of its driven roll. Unlike a track, belt thickness does affect the linear speed, but its usually pretty insignificant. Lenth of a conveyor has nothing to do with it. Increase the roll diameter and you increase the linear speed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capt.Storm Posted September 10, 2016 Share Posted September 10, 2016 Just now, ArcticCrusher said: The final speed of a conveyor is usually governed by the diameter of its driven roll. Unlike a track, belt thickness does affect the linear speed, but its usually pretty insignificant. Lenth of a conveyor has nothing to do with it. Increase the roll diameter and you increase the linear speed. you're wrong..length of the conveyor does make a diff if all else is equal. Lets say a motor is turning the conveyor at 1-1..the conveyor will always make one revolution for every time the motor makes one revolution...so that said if the conveyor is longer it will travel more distance for the same time allowed...one end of the conveyor is the axis..the other end as measured from the axis will be the circumference. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted September 10, 2016 Author Share Posted September 10, 2016 what a fucking idiot Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skidude600 Posted September 10, 2016 Share Posted September 10, 2016 Ban Ben. He being a condescending, know-it-all, azzhole and hes starting chit just to be a dick. lol!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capt.Storm Posted September 10, 2016 Share Posted September 10, 2016 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted September 10, 2016 Author Share Posted September 10, 2016 Capt is so smart ....he figured out that one revolution of a 100 foot long belt is less than one revolution of a 150 foot long belt Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capt.Storm Posted September 10, 2016 Share Posted September 10, 2016 (edited) 2 minutes ago, f7ben said: Capt is so smart ....he figured out that one revolution of a 100 foot long belt is less than one revolution of a 150 foot long belt no it stays the same silly..one rev is one rev..but the ft traveled per time allowed will be diff silly! Edited September 10, 2016 by Capt.Storm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ckf Posted September 10, 2016 Share Posted September 10, 2016 This thread might have legs. 15 pages? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capt.Storm Posted September 10, 2016 Share Posted September 10, 2016 1 minute ago, ckf said: This thread might have legs. 15 pages? he's thick..might take 20 pages if ever! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted September 10, 2016 Author Share Posted September 10, 2016 Just now, Capt.Storm said: no it stays the same silly..one rev is one rev..but the ft traveled per time allowed will be diff silly! no one rev is not one rev when the fucking head pulley has not changed diameter ....one rotation of the head pulley will move a 100' belt the same fucking distance as it will move a 1000' belt. We dont measure revolutions of the track ....we measure revolutions of the engine Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capt.Storm Posted September 10, 2016 Share Posted September 10, 2016 Just now, f7ben said: no one rev is not one rev when the fucking head pulley has not changed diameter ....one rotation of the head pulley will move a 100' belt the same fucking distance as it will move a 1000' belt. We dont measure revolutions of the track ....we measure revolutions of the engine look a longer conveyor belt will travel faster to get that one rev in from the gearing..what's so hard to understand about that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted September 10, 2016 Author Share Posted September 10, 2016 Just now, Capt.Storm said: look a longer conveyor belt will travel faster to get that one rev in from the gearing..what's so hard to understand about that? no it will not unless the drive pulley is being driven faster Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smokin george Posted September 10, 2016 Share Posted September 10, 2016 I just drove to town to pick up ice-cream. I'm not sure if I drove faster the ice cream would melt slower or would it melt the same 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capt.Storm Posted September 10, 2016 Share Posted September 10, 2016 2 minutes ago, f7ben said: no it will not unless the drive pulley is being driven faster you're wrong ..spend some time with google. When I was like 20 I used to set conveyors up in canning factories. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted September 10, 2016 Author Share Posted September 10, 2016 Just now, Capt.Storm said: you're wrong ..spend some time with google. When I was like 20 I used to set conveyors up in canning factories. oh please fucking explain to me how a longer belt is going to rotate around a drive pulley that is turning a constant speed faster than a shorter belt this ought to be good And I work with fucking conveyors of all kinds every day and have for years Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capt.Storm Posted September 10, 2016 Share Posted September 10, 2016 Just now, f7ben said: oh please fucking explain to me how a longer belt is going to rotate around a drive pulley that is turning a constant speed faster than a shorter belt this ought to be good And I work with fucking conveyors of all kinds every day and have for years you just answered your own question really. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted September 10, 2016 Share Posted September 10, 2016 19 minutes ago, Capt.Storm said: you're wrong..length of the conveyor does make a diff if all else is equal. Lets say a motor is turning the conveyor at 1-1..the conveyor will always make one revolution for every time the motor makes one revolution...so that said if the conveyor is longer it will travel more distance for the same time allowed...one end of the conveyor is the axis..the other end as measured from the axis will be the circumference. Here is a simplified example of of typical drive system for a conveyor. The diameter at the drive pulley determines how far the belt will move in one rev. The length of the belt has zero influence. The thickness of the belt will increase the diameter at the drive pulley but in most cases its not much. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted September 10, 2016 Author Share Posted September 10, 2016 Just now, Capt.Storm said: you just answered your own question really. the drive pulley is pulling the belt at a constant speed ....how is the belt length going to change that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.