Jump to content
Check your account email address ×

Strzok fired


Pete

Recommended Posts

  • Platinum Contributing Member
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, DriftBusta said:

If you watched his testimony, its pretty clear his firing, along with McCabe and Comey's, was legitimate.

I watched his testimony.  He's arrogant, he doesn't like the president but neither of those things in and of themselves are fireable offenses.  I'd like to see him sue then if he truly protected Hillary which IMO is far more of a reason to have fired him than any issues he had with Trump hopefully that will come out and there will be pressure to prosecute her. 

FTR I have zero doubt that there was an agenda among those at the FBI and other departments when it came to protecting Hillary but that also does not mean that Trumps campaign or Trump himself did no wrong. If they really did no wrong instead of attacking the Mueller investigation they should just STFU and let the investigation carry on.  

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Angry ginger said:

I watched his testimony.  He's arrogant, he doesn't like the president but neither of those things in and of themselves are fireable offenses.  I'd like to see him sue then if he truly protected Hillary which IMO is far more of a reason to have fired him than any issues he had with Trump hopefully that will come out and there will be pressure to prosecute her. 

FTR I have zero doubt that there was an agenda among those at the FBI and other departments when it came to protecting Hillary but that also does not mean that Trumps campaign or Trump himself did no wrong. If they really did no wrong instead of attacking the Mueller investigation they should just STFU and let the investigation carry on.  

 

 

 

I doubt he will sue. There’s likely more to it. Guy is a serious douche 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Angry ginger said:

I watched his testimony.  He's arrogant, he doesn't like the president but neither of those things in and of themselves are fireable offenses.  I'd like to see him sue then if he truly protected Hillary which IMO is far more of a reason to have fired him than any issues he had with Trump hopefully that will come out and there will be pressure to prosecute her. 

FTR I have zero doubt that there was an agenda among those at the FBI and other departments when it came to protecting Hillary but that also does not mean that Trumps campaign or Trump himself did no wrong. If they really did no wrong instead of attacking the Mueller investigation they should just STFU and let the investigation carry on.  

 

 

 

He lied under oath.  He changed wording to exonerate Hilary.  If I was Trump I would be beyond annoyed and pissed by now over the constant onslaught of attacks, by who is supposed to be an apolitical public servant.  I find it beyond fantastical that Trump is a Russian agent, particularly in light of all the cash flowing from them to the Clintons, and everyone seems to be just fine with that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
2 minutes ago, DriftBusta said:

He lied under oath.  He changed wording to exonerate Hilary.  If I was Trump I would be beyond annoyed and pissed by now over the constant onslaught of attacks, by who is supposed to be an apolitical public servant.  I find it beyond fantastical that Trump is a Russian agent, particularly in light of all the cash flowing from them to the Clintons, and everyone seems to be just fine with that.

Not to mention strzok got The Whole Ball rolling on the  need of the special counsel..... the stench and cover-up is unbelievable.

--------!-----

Come on Mueller expose the truth:

DkkRZpQXsAAQpH2.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is perhaps possible that Bowditch and Wray have some damaging information about Strzok that we don’t know about. Horowitz, the inspector general, is still carrying out a separate inquiry into the Bureau’s handling of the Trump-Russia investigation. Conceivably, he could have found something damning and tipped off Bowditch and Wray.

https://www.newyorker.com/news/our-columnists/the-fbi-needs-to-explain-its-reasons-for-firing-peter-strzok?mbid=social_twitter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Gold Member
1 hour ago, Zambroski said:

He left out the part about him being the lead in an FBI investigation that is supposed to be fair and unbiased.

Weird!

Look closer....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol

×
×
  • Create New...