Leaderboard

Well, would you look at this! Why don't we start with something easy to lead off the sled forum SO, a little show and tell about your current "flavor"? Mine: 2013 800 RR with 22/48 gears, BMP stage two full Team Tied Clutch with custom helix and Goldstar weights. Heavy springs designed to go from 30-70 from corner to corner whilst you knock bark off the trees.

Doing the same but substitute Labatt for cream soda.

Not at all.It was very light snow and the sled was slightly pointed downhill. Awesome day breaking trail

Anyone remember this one?

I have a complex array of accessories that go in the egg Jim haha. It's a lot of fun, you can cook so many things in different ways. There's a ceramic divider that goes between the fire and the food for indirect cooking, like an oven or a smoker. Pull the divider and it's direct over the flame like a charcoal grill. Wood fired pizzas at 700 degrees are out of this world. In a few hours I will be smoking a brisket that will go into tomorrow afternoon. There's a wifi controller that regulates the temps automatically, so I can sleep. It's really become a sickness if i am being honest.

Double decker ribeyes getting kissed with California Red Oak

Up at the lake house!

The xfinity race is on FS1 right now for anyone that may be interested.

In the rain we are checking into customs St. Joseph Island, Ontario February 2001, it was an epic day 2 of our ride around Superior; we would soon discover that the North Channel was a mess with lots of ugly ice with water on top of it and the tree line had been blown out by heavy winds. The day started out around 38*F in Cedarville Michigan and by the time we were 50 miles south of Chapleau we were in frigid whiteout conditions, we arrived in Chapleau at 9:30 and the clerk at Aux Trois Moulins not only tells me it's now -36F but that the town is booked, I told her that was alright as we would just sleep in the lobby...they found a room for the four us to pile into

Something about a sled picture thread but it makes you realize what a cool-ass toy they are!

I have a black '17 Renegade XRS on order. Can't wait to get it. Picked this one up for my son back in March '12 TNT 600carb 2,735 miles.

Remove all corporate money from politics

It reminds of when I had my boat and a lot of my friends did as well....we would anchor and raft off all day swimming and drinking.

My "Free" 07 800R 151 Summit. Was given to me...all it needed was a shortblock. Also have an 05 800, an 04 550 summit ZX, and about eight 550fan Revs...plus a couple other oddball sleds I'm rebuilding to sell.

Drinking a cream soda and watching okc/GS play game 6

More honey browns...

Nice looking sleds gentlemen I have a 2008 GSX 600 SDI. I also still have my '05 Renegade 600 SDI with about 12,000 miles on it. Motor has never been apart :knock on wood:

2011 800 pro r . 1.3 cobra ,riser ,big boy spring lol. Stock everything aside from grandpa windshield ,mirrors ,saddle bags and tank bag

Coors Light on a patio bar.

I went on the tour and pissed in the kettle. Enjoy your cow piss boys.

repeal all obama and bush executive orders

That is really cool Keith.

Time to change it up again...

It's called reverse sear Jim. Cook at 250, with some wood for smoke, until they reach around 120 internal temp, pull them off and rest them for 10 minutes. Then sear them on cast iron at 600 degrees.

Just the CUNT calls him that and he is fatter

Sunset over a pond in northern NH.

Drool......

Poured last night.....great day riding!

Time to change it up with some Country

Flag is gone, shame. Great ad even with the PC bullshit fucking things up.

Abandoned ore dock at the Lower Harbor in Marquette and one from Pictured Rocks.

Good race for the lead with 5 to go. Pulling for Larson

Powell was pissed off about being duped, it did not sit well with him.

Love the truck too. I bought a clamshell years ago got a great deal on it, but if I had it to do over again I would have gone for the inline. It's hard to justify spending anymore on sledding though, I never rode one inch last year.

Do you think we'd have been over there jerking around without the consent and support of the democrats? Do you know how government works? Or are you one that sits and cries and finds ways to blame the other side...from whatever side you sit on. Our government has been duping us since it's inception, and a larger government will dupe us even more...as it has been with our "leader". "Helping the middle class." What a load of shit. And I am pretty far from a "right winger". Both extremes of each side hold the most idiotic sheep we have in our country. And those two sides are the majority of the population. But if I had to do one or the other, after a complete full frontal labodomy, I'd have to at least see that the republicans create wealth and wealth creates jobs. Disproportionately? Yes. But at less they create jobs. Dems create wealth too, but only within government offices. After those pockets are lined, "distribution" will keep the dem voters "happy". So, while it's taken me years to finally realize this, I can work my life and finances to take advantage of every loophole and advantage both sides seem to think is best to keep their voting sheep in line. And I laugh every time I do it. Republicans make opportunities in the private sector, dems create opportunities within the government run programs. Know who can't take advantage of either very well? Folks that are on someone else's payroll. And the worst off are those on someone else's payroll that are actually working during large government admin years. The programs being instituted by their leaders aren't designed to help them. It's comical but I actually am allowed to put more money in my pocket during a Dem run government. But really, all I am doing is putting that unpaid portion on the next generation....but that seems to be "OK" by them. So,

Broke the seal tonight. 20+ Coors Light and 28c forcast tomorrow. Let er rip!!!

This was written in 2014. The number are worse now. http://www.forbes.com/sites/kylesmith/2014/09/11/sorry-obama-fans-reagan-did-better-on-jobs-and-growth/#7a29aeb13c92 Supporters of President Barack Obama, such as one of his campaign donors Robert Deitrick, an Ohio financial advisor often quoted in Forbes and elsewhere, insist that the Obama economy has been much more robust than Ronald Reagan’s. Are they right? Let’s look at some numbers. President Reagan entered office in a period of high inflation which was stamped out by high interest rates that in turn led to the 1982 recession. His job-creation record after that may fairly be termed outstanding: nearly 20 million more Americans were employed when he left office than when the recession ended. Overall, including the recession on his watch, Reagan’s net job growth over eight years was 16.1 million. Ronald Reagan wearing cowboy hat at Rancho del Cielo. (Photo credit: Wikipedia) Barack Obama entered office in different circumstances: He inherited a recession that was already well underway, which ended much earlier in his presidency than did the Reagan recession. If you think of the economic cycle like a bouncing ball, Obama entered office just as the ball was about to strike the pavement. The bounce, though, has proceeded in agonizingly slow motion. Some eight million jobs have been created under Obama since the mid-2009 end of the recession, with a net gain of about five million. Charting Obama and Reagan’s job-creation against overall U.S. population increases makes the picture look even worse for Obama, and the Reagan-era U.S. had a much smaller population. At any rate, more people have been added to the food-stamp rolls than the job rolls under Obama. It’s misleading to compare employment rates during the two presidencies. Imagine 90 out of 100 people are employed, and because the economy looks like it’s picking up more steam 10 more people enter the workforce. If nine out of ten of them find jobs, the unemployment rate doesn’t go down at all, yet ten percent more people are employed. Reagan’s economy was so strong that, for the last three-quarters of his administration, Americans were flooding into the workforce. Under Obama, the opposite has happened, and those who have given up on working aren’t counted as unemployed. Even today, more than five years into the tepid recovery, labor-force participation remains at its lowest level since 1978. Don’t blame waves of retirement for that fact: the Census Bureau reported that, from 2005 to 2010, older Americans actually became more likely to be employed. The percentage of 65-69 year-olds remaining in the workforce jumped from 26 percent to 32 percent over a ten-year-period ending in 2012. Among those 70-74 the jump was even more startling: from 14 percent to 19.5 percent. Meanwhile workers in the prime of their lives have simply left the playing field. Recommended by Forbes How about overall growth? GDP under Reagan was turbocharged compared to the Obama years. The Reagan years brought annual real GDP growth of 3.5 percent – 4.9 percent after the recession. In inflation-adjusted 2009 dollars, GDP jumped from 6.5 trillion at the end of 1980 to 8.61 trillion at the end of 1988. That’s a 32 percent bump. As Peter Ferrara pointed out on Forbes, it was the equivalent of adding the West German economy to the U.S. one. Under Obama, GDP up to June 30, 2014 has grown an anemic 9.6 percent, total . Reagan-era growth was far more than double the Obama rate. Ah, but did all of that Reagan bounty trickle down to ordinary Americans, though? Yes. Real (inflation-adjusted) median household income shot up some ten percent in the Reagan years. It has flatlined under Obama. English: Barack Obama delivers a speech at the University of Southern California (Video of the speech) (Photo credit: Wikipedia) How about Reagan’s spending record? Contrary to myth, and despite the opposition of a Democratic House of Representatives for his entire administration, Reagan achieved a reduction in federal spending as a percentage of GDP. That’s including his famed military buildup often credited with ending the Cold War and hence delivering the “peace dividend” that helped dampen federal spending in the 1990s, in which Reagan economic policy largely stayed in place. Spending fell from 22.9 percent of GDP to 22.1 percent in 1989, whereas under Obama it has hit as high as 25 percent and has steadily hovered above 24 percent. Total accumulated debt was at 53 percent of GDP when Reagan left office. Today it is at 102.7 percent of GDP, a level unprecedented since WW II. The debt has exploded by 66 percent in the Obama years. Does a president control the economy like a puppeteer? No, nor does a president have the power to spend; that’s a Congressional duty. Nevertheless, to argue that the economy is doing better under Obama than it did under Reagan is at best obtuse and at worst partisan hackery.

Just bought a "new" toy hauler