Jump to content
Check your account email address ×

FBI agents believe deal made to let's Hillary off.


Recommended Posts

In an unusual move, FBI agents working the Hillary Clinton email case had to sign a special form reminding them not to blab about the probe to anyone unless called to testify.

Sources said they had never heard of the “Case Briefing Acknowledgment” form being used before, although all agents must initially sign nondisclosure agreements to obtain security clearance.

 

“This is very, very unusual. I’ve never signed one, never circulated one to others,” said one retired FBI chief.

An FBI agent currently on the job admitted, “I have never heard of such a form. Sounds strange.”

Meanwhile, FBI agents expressed their “disappointment” over FBI Director James Comey’s decision not to recommend charges against Clinton, sources close to the matter told The Post.

“FBI agents believe there was an inside deal put in place after the Loretta Lynch/Bill Clinton tarmac meeting,” said one source.

Another source from the Justice Department was “furious” with Comey, saying he’s “managed to piss off right and left.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, racer254 said:

There is something on the internet now where you can type in some words and it will look it up for you.  I think it's called google.  Use it.

I'll help him.  You gotta dig for these stories a bit....the media buries them as fast as they can and as deep as they can.

http://nypost.com/2016/07/12/fbi-agents-signed-nda-for-matters-involving-hillarys-emails/

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, racer254 said:

There is something on the internet now where you can type in some words and it will look it up for you.  I think it's called google.  Use it.

and there is something called copyright laws dumb ass

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mainecat said:

Maybe ckf can clarify this law.

I haven't really looked in to it. I *think* that you need to post a link if you copy and paste an article.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, ckf said:

I haven't really looked in to it. I *think* that you need to post a link if you copy and paste an article.

A link is only required if the whole article is "cut and pasted".  And really only if the title, author, and source are deleted from the "cut".  News, "snippets", bits and pieces, quotes or summaries are good to go in most cases as long as they are not tampered with and used in opposition from what the original author intent.  By general rule, most readers understand that these "snippets", "summaries" etc..... are cut and pasted from an article from somewhere else.  Trying to "prosecute" or "fine/site" any of this from any forum site is a worthless cause.  Now, run a blog?  Run a website where it is other than an open forum?  Then, better get familiar with copy writing laws.

Edited by Zambroski
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Zambroski said:

A link is only required if the whole article is "cut and pasted".  And really only if the title, author, and source are deleted from the "cut".  News, "snippets", bits and pieces, quotes or summaries are good to go in most cases as long as they are not tampered with and used in opposition from what the original author intent.  By general rule, most readers understand that these "snippets", "summaries" etc..... are cut and pasted from an article from somewhere else.  Trying to "prosecute" or "fine/site" any of this from any forum site is a worthless cause.  Now, run a blog?  Run a website where it is other than an open forum?  Then, better get familiar with copy writing laws.

so post the link

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did ask Rob about it right after he turned FS over to me. He told me if anyone contacted me about copyrighted material to immediately remove it and there wouldn't be any problems.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ckf said:

I did ask Rob about it right after he turned FS over to me. He told me if anyone contacted me about copyrighted material to immediately remove it and there wouldn't be any problems.

:good:

Copyrighting laws are real cumbersome to enforce in this age of internet.  Hell, they keep trying to reform the rules but the internet is moving much faster then legislation can keep up.  Plain common sense when posting anything anywhere is good enough.  And like you said...if it is an issue for the author or original source, they'll let you know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Mainecat said:

so post the link

 

11 minutes ago, Zambroski said:

I already did.  A few posts up.

 

5 minutes ago, ckf said:

I did ask Rob about it right after he turned FS over to me. He told me if anyone contacted me about copyrighted material to immediately remove it and there wouldn't be any problems.

FFS.  If mc wants to comment on the original post, then do it.  Otherwise he is just acting like a child.  Either post your opinion or just stfu,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol

×
×
  • Create New...