This is an excellent book. a must have for what lays ahead.  
 

 

15 hours ago, ActionfigureJoe said:

It’ll be a matter of time and the rural folk will be eating their pets and grandparents. 

Everyone would. Rural or urban.

Neal

48 minutes ago, Joe Bidens Brain said:

dude he read a book

In your case….what a concept.  

If you are rural and the more rural the better being prepared is drastically more simple because location is much of it.  The less you have to defend your resources the better chance at survival. 

Being urban and having a rural "bugout" location assumes you can get there.  

Edited October 18, 2024Oct 18 by Highmark

32 minutes ago, Highmark said:

If you are rural and the more rural the better being prepared is drastically more simple because location is much of it.  The less you have to defend your resources the better chance at survival. 

Being urban and having a rural "bugout" location assumes you can get there.  

Traditionally the most successful humans at the art of survival in difficult situations are these that belong to a tribe. Ideally 50-75 members. Above 75 members internal struggles within the tribe create splinters. Below made them vulnerable to larger tribes. Lone nuts or small tribes rarely survived. That concept remains relevant in any setting. 

2 hours ago, Joe Bidens Brain said:

dude he read a book

Oh...I keep forgetting!  I guess I should stop bothering with history and all others with war experience knowing that the city is NOT the place to be during anything like this.  Also, I watch a lot of movies and it never seems to show anyone from rural areas jamming traffic to get into these shitholes so, Movies>Books.

1 hour ago, Highmark said:

If you are rural and the more rural the better being prepared is drastically more simple because location is much of it.  The less you have to defend your resources the better chance at survival. 

Being urban and having a rural "bugout" location assumes you can get there.  

Anyone thinking "same" or anything close is simply denying the reality that where they are now is fuck ball city...and they think they can hunker down and be fine...because, CITY!!!!   

56 minutes ago, ActionfigureJoe said:

Traditionally the most successful humans at the art of survival in difficult situations are these that belong to a tribe. Ideally 50-75 members. Above 75 members internal struggles within the tribe create splinters. Below made them vulnerable to larger tribes. Lone nuts or small tribes rarely survived. That concept remains relevant in any setting. 

You are going to pull a groin shifting narratives this quickly.  Hit the Advil now...don't wait.

Edited October 18, 2024Oct 18 by Zambroski

16 minutes ago, Zambroski said:

Oh...I keep forgetting!  I guess I should stop bothering with history and all others with war experience knowing that the city is NOT the place to be during anything like this.  Also, I watch a lot of movies and it never seems to show anyone from rural areas jamming traffic to get into these shitholes so, Movies>Books.

Anyone thinking "same" or anything close is simply denying the reality that where they are now is fuck ball city...and they think they can hunker down and be fine...because, CITY!!!!   

You are going to pull a groin shifting narratives this quickly.  Hit the Advil now...don't wait.

 Simply pointing out anthropological facts. There are some exceptions. If Yellowstone erupts, anyone living in the Midwest is fucked. You’ll be digging through 4 feet of ash for earthworms. If it’s nuclear, animals and plants will be radioactive in places. So tribes will no doubt be smaller. 

Edited October 18, 2024Oct 18 by ActionfigureJoe

7 minutes ago, ActionfigureJoe said:

 Simply pointing out anthropological facts. There are some exceptions. If Yellowstone erupts, anyone living in the Midwest is fucked. You’ll be digging through 4 feet of ash for earthworms. If it’s nuclear, animals and plants will be radioactive on many places. So tribes will no doubt be smaller. 

Right but none of that pertains the current discussion.  

1 minute ago, Zambroski said:

Right but none of that pertains the current discussion.  

Those are all black swan events. So it does pertain, dummy. If it’s internal, geopolitical conflicts (civil war) with a disruption of supply chains, America’s adversaries will take advantage of the situation while America swirls the drain. China, Russia, India, and Arab countries in the Middle East get stronger as the dollar collapses.  

 

 

 

 

8 hours ago, Highmark said:

If you are rural and the more rural the better being prepared is drastically more simple because location is much of it.  The less you have to defend your resources the better chance at survival. 

Being urban and having a rural "bugout" location assumes you can get there.  

The brother in laws told their kids, if SHTF, get to uncle Matt’s.

Need some people to man the ramparts anyway 

22 hours ago, ActionfigureJoe said:

Those are all black swan events. So it does pertain, dummy. If it’s internal, geopolitical conflicts (civil war) with a disruption of supply chains, America’s adversaries will take advantage of the situation while America swirls the drain. China, Russia, India, and Arab countries in the Middle East get stronger as the dollar collapses.  

SMH.  Your retard is showing.  But, take shelter in the big city.  Enjoy!

16 hours ago, Voodoo said:

The brother in laws told their kids, if SHTF, get to uncle Matt’s.

Need some people to man the ramparts anyway 

Clearly, "Uncle Matt" must live in the big city.  Everyone will be flocking there on the outset of fan hitting.  

 

On 10/17/2024 at 10:16 AM, ActionfigureJoe said:

Don’t you have size 7 feet? 

He is YUGE