Platinum Contributing Member Steve753 Posted September 5, 2023 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted September 5, 2023 38 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said: You were 100% wrong about covid. Own it. No Aids pandemic No myocarditis pandemic No pandemic of people dying from the vaccines. Ya I've been wrong alright. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted September 5, 2023 Share Posted September 5, 2023 Just now, Steve753 said: No Aids pandemic No myocarditis pandemic No pandemic of people dying from the vaccines. Ya I've been wrong alright. Are you up to date on your boosters? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Steve753 Posted September 5, 2023 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted September 5, 2023 Just now, ACE said: Are you up to date on your boosters? No. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted September 5, 2023 Share Posted September 5, 2023 1 minute ago, Steve753 said: No. Why don’t you trust the experts? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Steve753 Posted September 5, 2023 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted September 5, 2023 2 minutes ago, ACE said: Why don’t you trust the experts? I personally have never felt I needed it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted September 5, 2023 Share Posted September 5, 2023 8 minutes ago, Steve753 said: No Aids pandemic No myocarditis pandemic No pandemic of people dying from the vaccines. Ya I've been wrong alright. 1 in 2000 kids with myocarditis is nothing for you. 40% excess death increase. Stay stupid Schultz. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Steve753 Posted September 5, 2023 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted September 5, 2023 Just now, ArcticCrusher said: 1 in 2000 kids with myocarditis is nothing for you. 40% excess death increase. Stay stupid Schultz. Made up numbers by your cult. Nothing more. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted September 5, 2023 Share Posted September 5, 2023 1 minute ago, Steve753 said: Made up numbers by your cult. Nothing more. What do your numbers tell you? You know fact check. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted September 5, 2023 Share Posted September 5, 2023 7 minutes ago, Steve753 said: I personally have never felt I needed it. Is that what the experts say? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Steve753 Posted September 5, 2023 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted September 5, 2023 Just now, ACE said: Is that what the experts say? Why do you use the experts numbers then? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Steve753 Posted September 5, 2023 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted September 5, 2023 2 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said: What do your numbers tell you? You know fact check. You really should reread your posts from the last year or so. You'd be embarrassed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted September 5, 2023 Share Posted September 5, 2023 1 minute ago, Steve753 said: Why do you use the experts numbers then? Try that again but in English please Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Steve753 Posted September 5, 2023 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted September 5, 2023 Just now, ACE said: Try that again but in English please Why do you use the experts numbers then? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted September 5, 2023 Share Posted September 5, 2023 1 minute ago, Steve753 said: Why do you use the experts numbers then? What? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted September 5, 2023 Share Posted September 5, 2023 The paper, published in the August issue of the journal The Lancet Microbe, found that infected people presymptomatically--that is before they developed symptoms--very rarely had the ability to infect others. ... What this means is that compelling people without Covid symptoms to wear masks in any number of environments--including, most controversially, schools--along with quarantining healthy people, closing schools, and other social distancing measures likely yielded far, far less societal benefit than we were told. Neither finding has received much attention (outside of this newsletter), though both studies employed methods that are more reliable than those that supported the notion that "silent spread" fueled the pandemic. The Lancet paper detailed the results of what is known as a challenge study, where participants were purposefully infected with SARS-CoV-2 (the virus that causes Covid) and then monitored in a controlled environment. The researchers, from Imperial College London, then tested for presence of the virus on the inside of masks worn by participants, their hands, and the air and surfaces in individual rooms that participants were kept in for at least 14 days. The authors found that just 7% of emissions into the air and environment from infected participants occurred before the first reported symptom. This is an arresting finding, considering that it contradicts the prevailing wisdom among health professionals, authorities, and the public. Modeling studies--which are conjecture, based on subjective inputs from the modelers--as early as May 2020 had estimated that roughly 30% to 50% of community transmission occurred before reported symptoms. This set the narrative for the pandemic, and was used as a justification for much of the policies imposed on the public. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
p51mstg Posted September 5, 2023 Share Posted September 5, 2023 Is this the beginning of a 25th Amendment action by the Democrats? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Steve753 Posted September 5, 2023 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted September 5, 2023 6 minutes ago, Snake said: The paper, published in the August issue of the journal The Lancet Microbe, found that infected people presymptomatically--that is before they developed symptoms--very rarely had the ability to infect others. ... What this means is that compelling people without Covid symptoms to wear masks in any number of environments--including, most controversially, schools--along with quarantining healthy people, closing schools, and other social distancing measures likely yielded far, far less societal benefit than we were told. Neither finding has received much attention (outside of this newsletter), though both studies employed methods that are more reliable than those that supported the notion that "silent spread" fueled the pandemic. The Lancet paper detailed the results of what is known as a challenge study, where participants were purposefully infected with SARS-CoV-2 (the virus that causes Covid) and then monitored in a controlled environment. The researchers, from Imperial College London, then tested for presence of the virus on the inside of masks worn by participants, their hands, and the air and surfaces in individual rooms that participants were kept in for at least 14 days. The authors found that just 7% of emissions into the air and environment from infected participants occurred before the first reported symptom. This is an arresting finding, considering that it contradicts the prevailing wisdom among health professionals, authorities, and the public. Modeling studies--which are conjecture, based on subjective inputs from the modelers--as early as May 2020 had estimated that roughly 30% to 50% of community transmission occurred before reported symptoms. This set the narrative for the pandemic, and was used as a justification for much of the policies imposed on the public. When was this research conducted? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 5, 2023 Share Posted September 5, 2023 1 hour ago, Steve753 said: When was this research conducted? Hopefully it's a better source than the one who claimed "legal gun owners do not commit crimes" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gold Member EvilBird Posted September 5, 2023 Gold Member Share Posted September 5, 2023 fucking morons 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gold Member EvilBird Posted September 5, 2023 Gold Member Share Posted September 5, 2023 36 minutes ago, Steve753 said: I personally have never felt I needed it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gold Member EvilBird Posted September 5, 2023 Gold Member Share Posted September 5, 2023 (edited) trust the science until you decide not to trust the science ... Thats everyone Now who doesn't get a current booster Yet ridiculed those in the beginning who said the vax was shit. Edited September 5, 2023 by EvilBird Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Steve753 Posted September 5, 2023 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted September 5, 2023 2 minutes ago, EvilBird said: I've never pushed the vaccine. I merely point out the bullshit that AC continually tries to pass as truth. It's obvious you're confused over this. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted September 5, 2023 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted September 5, 2023 Few vaccines prevent infection however this vaccine was sold to the public that it did. To top that off they claimed it would stop transmission....of course that was a lie to. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Steve753 Posted September 5, 2023 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted September 5, 2023 1 minute ago, Highmark said: Few vaccines prevent infection however this vaccine was sold to the public that it did. To top that off they claimed it would stop transmission....of course that was a lie to. To bad Trump didn't win in 2020. I have a feeling antivaxxers would've been democrats instead of primarily Republicans. Ya its that simple. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted September 5, 2023 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted September 5, 2023 Just now, Steve753 said: To bad Trump didn't win in 2020. I have a feeling antivaxxers would've been democrats instead of primarily Republicans. Ya its that simple. I've said that before on here. The dem leadership were the anti-vaxxers during 2020 but there was definitely strong pushback from conservative voters on the jab as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.