Dr. Jill got the covids for the 2nd time..You would think she would have gotten vaccinated...

Just now, Steve753 said:

No Aids pandemic 

No myocarditis pandemic 

No pandemic of people dying from the vaccines.

Ya I've been wrong alright.

Are you up to date on your boosters?

Just now, ACE said:

Are you up to date on your boosters?

No.

1 minute ago, Steve753 said:

No.

Why don’t you trust the experts?

2 minutes ago, ACE said:

Why don’t you trust the experts?

I personally have never felt I needed it.

8 minutes ago, Steve753 said:

No Aids pandemic 

No myocarditis pandemic 

No pandemic of people dying from the vaccines.

Ya I've been wrong alright.

1 in 2000 kids with myocarditis is nothing for you.

40% excess death increase.

Stay stupid Schultz.

Just now, ArcticCrusher said:

1 in 2000 kids with myocarditis is nothing for you.

40% excess death increase.

Stay stupid Schultz.

Made up numbers by your cult. Nothing more.

1 minute ago, Steve753 said:

Made up numbers by your cult. Nothing more.

What do your numbers tell you?

You know fact check.

7 minutes ago, Steve753 said:

I personally have never felt I needed it.

Is that what the experts say?

Just now, ACE said:

Is that what the experts say?

Why do you use the experts numbers then?

2 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said:

What do your numbers tell you?

You know fact check.

You really should reread your posts from the last year or so. You'd be embarrassed. 

1 minute ago, Steve753 said:

Why do you use the experts numbers then?

Try that again but in English please 

Just now, ACE said:

Try that again but in English please 

Why do you use the experts numbers then?

1 minute ago, Steve753 said:

Why do you use the experts numbers then?

What?

The paper, published in the August issue of the journal The Lancet Microbe, found that infected people presymptomatically--that is before they developed symptoms--very rarely had the ability to infect others.

...

What this means is that compelling people without Covid symptoms to wear masks in any number of environments--including, most controversially, schools--along with quarantining healthy people, closing schools, and other social distancing measures likely yielded far, far less societal benefit than we were told.

Neither finding has received much attention (outside of this newsletter), though both studies employed methods that are more reliable than those that supported the notion that "silent spread" fueled the pandemic.

The Lancet paper detailed the results of what is known as a challenge study, where participants were purposefully infected with SARS-CoV-2 (the virus that causes Covid) and then monitored in a controlled environment. The researchers, from Imperial College London, then tested for presence of the virus on the inside of masks worn by participants, their hands, and the air and surfaces in individual rooms that participants were kept in for at least 14 days. The authors found that just 7% of emissions into the air and environment from infected participants occurred before the first reported symptom.

This is an arresting finding, considering that it contradicts the prevailing wisdom among health professionals, authorities, and the public. Modeling studies--which are conjecture, based on subjective inputs from the modelers--as early as May 2020 had estimated that roughly 30% to 50% of community transmission occurred before reported symptoms. This set the narrative for the pandemic, and was used as a justification for much of the policies imposed on the public.

Is this the beginning of a 25th Amendment action by the Democrats?

6 minutes ago, Snake said:

The paper, published in the August issue of the journal The Lancet Microbe, found that infected people presymptomatically--that is before they developed symptoms--very rarely had the ability to infect others.

...

What this means is that compelling people without Covid symptoms to wear masks in any number of environments--including, most controversially, schools--along with quarantining healthy people, closing schools, and other social distancing measures likely yielded far, far less societal benefit than we were told.

Neither finding has received much attention (outside of this newsletter), though both studies employed methods that are more reliable than those that supported the notion that "silent spread" fueled the pandemic.

The Lancet paper detailed the results of what is known as a challenge study, where participants were purposefully infected with SARS-CoV-2 (the virus that causes Covid) and then monitored in a controlled environment. The researchers, from Imperial College London, then tested for presence of the virus on the inside of masks worn by participants, their hands, and the air and surfaces in individual rooms that participants were kept in for at least 14 days. The authors found that just 7% of emissions into the air and environment from infected participants occurred before the first reported symptom.

This is an arresting finding, considering that it contradicts the prevailing wisdom among health professionals, authorities, and the public. Modeling studies--which are conjecture, based on subjective inputs from the modelers--as early as May 2020 had estimated that roughly 30% to 50% of community transmission occurred before reported symptoms. This set the narrative for the pandemic, and was used as a justification for much of the policies imposed on the public.

When was this research conducted?

1 hour ago, Steve753 said:

When was this research conducted?

Hopefully it's a better source than the one who claimed "legal gun owners do not commit crimes" 

fucking morons 

36 minutes ago, Steve753 said:

I personally have never felt I needed it.

trust the science until you decide not to trust the science ...

Thats everyone Now who doesn't get a current booster Yet ridiculed those in the beginning who said the vax was shit. 

Edited September 5, 20231 yr by EvilBird

2 minutes ago, EvilBird said:

I've never pushed the vaccine. I merely point out the bullshit that AC continually tries to pass as truth. 

It's obvious you're confused over this.

Few vaccines prevent infection however this vaccine was sold to the public that it did.  To top that off they claimed it would stop transmission....of course that was a lie to.   

1 minute ago, Highmark said:

Few vaccines prevent infection however this vaccine was sold to the public that it did.  To top that off they claimed it would stop transmission....of course that was a lie to.   

To bad Trump didn't win in 2020. I have a feeling antivaxxers would've been democrats instead of primarily Republicans. 

Ya its that simple.

Just now, Steve753 said:

To bad Trump didn't win in 2020. I have a feeling antivaxxers would've been democrats instead of primarily Republicans. 

Ya its that simple.

I've said that before on here.   

The dem leadership were the anti-vaxxers during 2020 but there was definitely strong pushback from conservative voters on the jab as well. 

3 minutes ago, Highmark said:

Few vaccines prevent infection however this vaccine was sold to the public that it did.  To top that off they claimed it would stop transmission....of course that was a lie to.   

And dont forget anyone who didnt want it was harassed, blamed and ridiculed. 

Which people love to forget. 

2 minutes ago, Steve753 said:

To bad Trump didn't win in 2020. I have a feeling antivaxxers would've been democrats instead of primarily Republicans. 

Ya its that simple.

You are so full of shit dude its up to your ears.