ArcticCrusher Posted December 6, 2022 Share Posted December 6, 2022 53 minutes ago, Deephaven said: And when the R's do it on Truth Social it is ok, right? So bureaucrats exist only on one side? Interesting logic. They weren't orders btw either, but requests. This is nothing new and has been happening for as long as there has been media. Or is there some new conspiracy that you are trying to allude to that you yourself yet don't understand? Do you understand you're a total moron. They (FBI) suppressed the Hunter Laptop with the help of 51 intel agents, knowing it was all true. Who was the sitting president at the time? Both sides my ass. Clueless low IQ idiot. 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted December 6, 2022 Share Posted December 6, 2022 7 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said: Do you understand you're a total moron. They (FBI) suppressed the Hunter Laptop with the help of 51 intel agents, knowing it was all true. Who was the sitting president at the time? Both sides my ass. Clueless low IQ idiot. These morons went from saying there’s no way they’d have the audacity to actually do this to saying it’s awesome that they did it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deephaven Posted December 6, 2022 Share Posted December 6, 2022 24 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said: Do you understand you're a total moron. I understand that you are too stupid to understand ANYTHING you read and always draw the wrong conclusions. 24 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said: They (FBI) suppressed the Hunter Laptop I thought this was about Twitter not the FBI. Social media platforms can choose if they want a side. Standard bureaucracy. Anything privately held can make its own choice, anything with a board of directors can choose the route they want their company to go. Being a news source by default doesn't mean you will post anything, but you post what you want and what you define as news. It is a for profit corporation... 24 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said: ....with the help of 51 intel agents, knowing it was all true. Considering you know of everyone involved it doesn't sound suppressed. 24 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said: Both sides my ass. So Truth Social is going to post negative things about Trump? If not, then both sides indeed. 24 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said: Clueless low IQ idiot. Sadly, you define clueless 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted December 6, 2022 Share Posted December 6, 2022 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 6, 2022 Share Posted December 6, 2022 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted December 6, 2022 Share Posted December 6, 2022 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ActionfigureJoe Posted December 6, 2022 Share Posted December 6, 2022 50 minutes ago, toslow said: Why did they care so much when they was hunting trump? Ask them!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted December 6, 2022 Share Posted December 6, 2022 24 minutes ago, Deephaven said: I understand that you are too stupid to understand ANYTHING you read and always draw the wrong conclusions. I thought this was about Twitter not the FBI. Social media platforms can choose if they want a side. Standard bureaucracy. Anything privately held can make its own choice, anything with a board of directors can choose the route they want their company to go. Being a news source by default doesn't mean you will post anything, but you post what you want and what you define as news. It is a for profit corporation... Considering you know of everyone involved it doesn't sound suppressed. So Truth Social is going to post negative things about Trump? If not, then both sides indeed. Sadly, you define clueless This was a blatant 1a violation. Again you prove to be a fucking idiot. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toslow Posted December 6, 2022 Share Posted December 6, 2022 6 minutes ago, ActionfigureJoe said: Ask them!! I'm asking you leftards on the forum. Seem to trigger yall Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 6, 2022 Share Posted December 6, 2022 1 minute ago, ArcticCrusher said: This was a blatant 1a violation. Again you prove to be a fucking idiot. So how did it effect YOUR election? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member SnowRider Posted December 6, 2022 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted December 6, 2022 1 minute ago, ArcticCrusher said: This was a blatant 1a violation. Again you prove to be a fucking idiot. Like the true dumbfuck that you are - you immediately jump to conclusions. Of course you are gut hooked and in a cult so no one besides your fellow cult members are surprised. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted December 6, 2022 Share Posted December 6, 2022 Just now, ArcticCrusher said: This was a blatant 1a violation. Again you prove to be a fucking idiot. That’s what the lawsuits are about it’ll be open to interpretation of the judges imo. I believe the 1a says they can’t pass a law to censor citizens or journalists. Which they didn’t. But they did collude with US intelligence and media to censor citizens and journalists Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toslow Posted December 6, 2022 Share Posted December 6, 2022 Just now, SnowRider said: Like the true dumbfuck that you are - you immediately jump to conclusions. Of course you are gut hooked and in a cult so no one besides your fellow cult members are surprised. So the trump haters aren't a cult. Or was i told another lie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ActionfigureJoe Posted December 6, 2022 Share Posted December 6, 2022 Just now, toslow said: I'm asking you leftards on the forum. Seem to trigger yall So ask them. I wasn’t a prognosticator nor a supporter of Russiagate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted December 6, 2022 Share Posted December 6, 2022 1 minute ago, HSR said: So how did it effect YOUR election? Similar but different. Trudeau promised select media millions of dollars if he got elected so you can imagine how their portrayal of him was Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toslow Posted December 6, 2022 Share Posted December 6, 2022 Just now, ActionfigureJoe said: So ask them. I wasn’t a prognosticator nor a supporter of Russiagate. I was till you reacted to my post. Or that an instinct of the left they don't know they have Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member SnowRider Posted December 6, 2022 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted December 6, 2022 1 minute ago, toslow said: So the trump haters aren't a cult. Or was i told another lie Are you dumb or do you just act like it on the interwebs? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 6, 2022 Share Posted December 6, 2022 Just now, ACE said: Similar but different. Trudeau promised select media millions of dollars if he got elected so you can imagine how their portrayal of him was The media didn't need to do fuck all, the citiot Libs would vote that way regardless. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted December 6, 2022 Share Posted December 6, 2022 2 minutes ago, ACE said: That’s what the lawsuits are about it’ll be open to interpretation of the judges imo. I believe the 1a says they can’t pass a law to censor citizens or journalists. Which they didn’t. But they did collude with US intelligence and media to censor citizens and journalists They used big tech to get around the 1a and the morons have no clue. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ActionfigureJoe Posted December 6, 2022 Share Posted December 6, 2022 Just now, toslow said: I was till you reacted to my post. Or that an instinct of the left they don't know they have I have no idea what you’re even talking about Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toslow Posted December 6, 2022 Share Posted December 6, 2022 Just now, SnowRider said: Are you dumb or do you just act like it on the interwebs? Taken from one of the dumbest asses on here, you'll soon be getting your gold member Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted December 6, 2022 Share Posted December 6, 2022 1 minute ago, ArcticCrusher said: They used big tech to get around the 1a and the morons have no clue. It may or may not have gotten around it. That’s yet to be determined in court Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toslow Posted December 6, 2022 Share Posted December 6, 2022 1 minute ago, ActionfigureJoe said: I have no idea what you’re even talking about You have no idea what you're talking about Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SSFB Posted December 6, 2022 Share Posted December 6, 2022 37 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said: This was a blatant 1a violation. Again you prove to be a fucking idiot. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deephaven Posted December 6, 2022 Share Posted December 6, 2022 37 minutes ago, ACE said: it’ll be open to interpretation of the judges imo. I believe the 1a says they can’t pass a law to censor citizens or journalists. Which they didn’t. Sort of defeating your butt buddies commentary. 33 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said: They used big tech to get around the 1a and the morons have no clue. You have no clue that is true. So the bureaucrats did their job. Should be ashamed that the ones supporting the R's failed so poorly. Not sure how the clueless Dem's managed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.