Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted April 4, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted April 4, 2017 If the Bush administration was surveilling others that "incidentally" captured people in the Obama or Clinton team a year before the election? Then imagine the outrage and calls of racism or misogyny if the National Security Adviser and other top officials were involved in unmasking the names of the Obama or Clinton team and leaking them to the press to damage them politically. Reality is this is a political scandal unlike anything we have seen since Watergate and the MSM is COMPLETELY ignoring it. The left is outraged that the Russian's may have been spying on Clinton which of course is unfair only to us as we were spying on their diplomats as well as others. Is there anything in the world more hypocritical than the US govt? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
old indy Posted April 4, 2017 Share Posted April 4, 2017 That'd be a tough one to beat, for sure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted April 4, 2017 Share Posted April 4, 2017 1 hour ago, Highmark said: If the Bush administration was surveilling others that "incidentally" captured people in the Obama or Clinton team a year before the election? Then imagine the outrage and calls of racism or misogyny if the National Security Adviser and other top officials were involved in unmasking the names of the Obama or Clinton team and leaking them to the press to damage them politically. Reality is this is a political scandal unlike anything we have seen since Watergate and the MSM is COMPLETELY ignoring it. The left is outraged that the Russian's may have been spying on Clinton which of course is unfair only to us as we were spying on their diplomats as well as others. Is there anything in the world more hypocritical than the US govt? Watch Rachel Maddow's show. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted April 4, 2017 Share Posted April 4, 2017 2 minutes ago, Mainecat said: Watch Rachel Maddow's show. Some dont have that kind of time to waste. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rw06GT Posted April 4, 2017 Share Posted April 4, 2017 I'm gonna need slinger to connect the dots for me on this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted April 4, 2017 Author Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted April 4, 2017 6 minutes ago, Mainecat said: Watch Rachel Maddow's show. Why is there another bombshell revelation on Trump's tax returns? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cold War Posted April 4, 2017 Share Posted April 4, 2017 The media is disgusting. Chelsea is saving the world is the breaking lead story. Wierd,no reporting on what she and her husband are worth. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted April 4, 2017 Share Posted April 4, 2017 1 hour ago, Highmark said: Why is there another bombshell revelation on Trump's tax returns? Afraid you might learn something? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted April 4, 2017 Share Posted April 4, 2017 38 minutes ago, Mainecat said: Watch Rachel Maddow's show. .....wait........ ok......ok, so.... 33 minutes ago, Rw06GT said: I'm gonna need slinger to connect the dots for me on this. Yeah...me too. But wait, here it is: 29 minutes ago, Mainecat said: Afraid you might learn something? You are the perfect idiot MC! PERFECT! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted April 4, 2017 Author Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted April 4, 2017 (edited) 46 minutes ago, Mainecat said: Afraid you might learn something? I actually watch her quite a bit. It's good comedy. Election night was AWESOME! I can watch it over and over and over again. "Even if he wins all of the toss up states which nobody does he would still lose." Edited April 4, 2017 by Highmark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepr2 Posted April 4, 2017 Share Posted April 4, 2017 4 minutes ago, Highmark said: I actually watch her quite a bit. It's good comedy. Election night was AWESOME! I can watch it over and over and over again. "Even if he wins all of the toss up states which nobody does he would still lose." And the Liar gets owned again Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anler Posted April 4, 2017 Share Posted April 4, 2017 1 hour ago, Highmark said: If the Bush administration was surveilling others that "incidentally" captured people in the Obama or Clinton team a year before the election? Then imagine the outrage and calls of racism or misogyny if the National Security Adviser and other top officials were involved in unmasking the names of the Obama or Clinton team and leaking them to the press to damage them politically. Reality is this is a political scandal unlike anything we have seen since Watergate and the MSM is COMPLETELY ignoring it. The left is outraged that the Russian's may have been spying on Clinton which of course is unfair only to us as we were spying on their diplomats as well as others. Is there anything in the world more hypocritical than the US govt? Exactly. Its only outrageous when the target is someone you like. And yes it should be illegal. But our govt has been doing that since Hoover formed the FBI. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gold Member Kivalo Posted April 4, 2017 Gold Member Share Posted April 4, 2017 1 hour ago, Mainecat said: Watch Rachel Maddow's show. If you hit yourself in the head with a hammer, you'll be smarter in the long run. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted April 4, 2017 Share Posted April 4, 2017 Holy shit is the liberal MSM attacking FOX NEWS over this! Like Obama said..it's all Fox news' fault. I think there needs to be a special prosecutor to find out what collusion existed between Russia and FOX news. One appointed by the Democrats and overseen by Rachel Maddow. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted April 4, 2017 Author Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted April 4, 2017 (edited) 7 minutes ago, Anler said: Exactly. Its only outrageous when the target is someone you like. And yes it should be illegal. But our govt has been doing that since Hoover formed the FBI. You see no difference in our govt spying on us vs. foreign govt's spying on us? I'll say it again whether an inside job or Russian phishing scam or Russian govt I'm all for holding those who stole the private property of the DNC accountable however its not even in the same ballpark as our own govt who just so happens to be the opposing party spying on a campaign or candidate. If anyone here thinks that damaging information wouldn't have been leaked to the MSM or the Clinton camp if found is crazy. The intell community thru incidental surveillance can spy on anyone they want. Hell we KNOW without question they don't even need that. Its just used as an excuse to make it look legal. Edited April 4, 2017 by Highmark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anler Posted April 4, 2017 Share Posted April 4, 2017 Just now, Highmark said: You see no difference in our govt spying on us vs. foreign govt's spying on us? I'll say it again whether an inside job or Russian phishing scam or Russian govt I'm all for holding those who stole the private property of the DNC accountable however its not even in the same ballpark as our own govt who just so happens to be the opposing party spying on a campaign or candidate. If anyone here thinks that damaging information wouldn't have been leaked to the MSM or the Clinton camp if found is crazy. The intell community thru incidental surveillance can spy on anyone they want. Rumor is Hoover had dirt on all kinds of US diplomats. And dont think for a minute that the pubes didnt use every resource possible to dig up dirt on Obama. If Trump was the man he says he is he would dismantle that whole domestic spying operation today... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted April 4, 2017 Author Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted April 4, 2017 (edited) 5 minutes ago, Anler said: Rumor is Hoover had dirt on all kinds of US diplomats. And dont think for a minute that the pubes didnt use every resource possible to dig up dirt on Obama. If Trump was the man he says he is he would dismantle that whole domestic spying operation today... Hoover? You do know he's been dead for 44 years? I'm not denying he spied on politicians but come on that's a bit irrelevant to the topics being discussed. When you got proof that the Bush admin used govt spying capabilities to dig up dirt on Obama then post it up. Do you think for a second that could have been done to him without leaks. Its clearly obvious how this would be handled by the MSM if the roles were reversed. Pretty obtuse not to see that. Edited April 4, 2017 by Highmark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anler Posted April 4, 2017 Share Posted April 4, 2017 7 minutes ago, Highmark said: Hoover? You do know he's been dead for 44 years? I'm not denying he spied on politicians but come on that's a bit irrelevant to the topics being discussed. When you got proof that the Bush admin used govt spying capabilities to dig up dirt on Obama then post it up. Do you think for a second that could have been done to him without leaks. Its clearly obvious how this would be handled by the MSM if the roles were reversed. Pretty obtuse not to see that. Not irrelevant at all. He started it all. Those govt agencies are nothing but spying vehicles. dont think for a minute that this hasnt gone on till now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted April 4, 2017 Share Posted April 4, 2017 "Thanks Obama!" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted April 4, 2017 Author Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted April 4, 2017 (edited) 10 minutes ago, Anler said: Not irrelevant at all. He started it all. Those govt agencies are nothing but spying vehicles. dont think for a minute that this hasnt gone on till now. Well we do know Obama was listening in on Congressional leaders calls. I've yet to see proof of a GOP POTUS doing it but I guess spying was going on just how much was Bush asking for. According to a bombshell Wall Street Journal article by Adam Entous and Danny Yadron, published online late Monday, the National Security Agency provided the White House with intercepted Israeli communications containing details of private discussions between Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu and U.S. lawmakers and American Jewish groups on the Iran nuclear deal. If true, this could be the biggest scandal of the Obama presidency. The Journal article explains that President Obama decided to stop NSA collection against certain foreign leaders after the backlash against Edward Snowden’s disclosure that the NSA had eavesdropped on German chancellor Angela Merkel’s cellphone and monitored communications of the heads of state of other close U.S. allies. According to the Journal story, President Obama did not halt NSA spying against Netanyahu. This is not a surprise, given the president’s chilly relations with the Israeli leader and Israel’s aggressive spying against the United States. It’s also not a surprise that the Obama administration sought intelligence on Netanyahu’s efforts to undermine the nuclear deal. But it is stunning to learn that NSA sent the White House intelligence on private discussions with U.S. congressmen on a major policy dispute between the White House and Congress. According to the Journal article, to avoid a paper trail that would show that they wanted the NSA to report on Netanyahu’s interactions with Congress, Obama officials decided to let the agency decide how much of this intelligence to provide and what to withhold. The article cited an unnamed U.S. official who explained, “We didn’t say, ‘Do it.’ We didn’t say, ‘Don’t do it.’” This suggests major misconduct by the NSA and the White House of a sort not seen since Watergate. This suggests major misconduct by the NSA and the White House of a sort not seen since Watergate. First, intercepts of congressmen’s communications regarding a dispute between Congress and the White House should have been destroyed and never left the NSA building. The Journal article said a 2011 NSA directive requires direct communications between foreign intelligence targets and members of Congress to be destroyed, but gives the NSA director the authority to waive this requirement if he determines the communications contain “significant foreign intelligence.” http://www.redstate.com/streiff/2017/03/05/flashback.-remember-obama-used-nsa-spy-congress/ Scary shit if true. http://www.theblaze.com/news/2017/03/25/shocking-nsa-whistle-blower-tells-tucker-carlson-trump-supreme-court-congress-likely-spied-on/ Edited April 4, 2017 by Highmark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anler Posted April 4, 2017 Share Posted April 4, 2017 1 minute ago, Highmark said: Well we do know Obama was listening in on Congressional leaders calls. I've yet to see proof of a GOP POTUS doing it but I guess spying was going on just how much was Bush asking for. According to a bombshell Wall Street Journal article by Adam Entous and Danny Yadron, published online late Monday, the National Security Agency provided the White House with intercepted Israeli communications containing details of private discussions between Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu and U.S. lawmakers and American Jewish groups on the Iran nuclear deal. If true, this could be the biggest scandal of the Obama presidency. The Journal article explains that President Obama decided to stop NSA collection against certain foreign leaders after the backlash against Edward Snowden’s disclosure that the NSA had eavesdropped on German chancellor Angela Merkel’s cellphone and monitored communications of the heads of state of other close U.S. allies. According to the Journal story, President Obama did not halt NSA spying against Netanyahu. This is not a surprise, given the president’s chilly relations with the Israeli leader and Israel’s aggressive spying against the United States. It’s also not a surprise that the Obama administration sought intelligence on Netanyahu’s efforts to undermine the nuclear deal. But it is stunning to learn that NSA sent the White House intelligence on private discussions with U.S. congressmen on a major policy dispute between the White House and Congress. According to the Journal article, to avoid a paper trail that would show that they wanted the NSA to report on Netanyahu’s interactions with Congress, Obama officials decided to let the agency decide how much of this intelligence to provide and what to withhold. The article cited an unnamed U.S. official who explained, “We didn’t say, ‘Do it.’ We didn’t say, ‘Don’t do it.’” This suggests major misconduct by the NSA and the White House of a sort not seen since Watergate. This suggests major misconduct by the NSA and the White House of a sort not seen since Watergate. First, intercepts of congressmen’s communications regarding a dispute between Congress and the White House should have been destroyed and never left the NSA building. The Journal article said a 2011 NSA directive requires direct communications between foreign intelligence targets and members of Congress to be destroyed, but gives the NSA director the authority to waive this requirement if he determines the communications contain “significant foreign intelligence.” http://www.redstate.com/streiff/2017/03/05/flashback.-remember-obama-used-nsa-spy-congress/ Scary shit if true. http://www.theblaze.com/news/2017/03/25/shocking-nsa-whistle-blower-tells-tucker-carlson-trump-supreme-court-congress-likely-spied-on/ That Obama was a tenacious mother fucker. I dont think he ever slept, he just did illegal shit 24/7! He's listening in on everybody, forcing liberal agendas down our throat, trying to infiltrate his muslim brotherhood into our govt, conspiring with Iran, tanking the economy, taking our guns... Its just non-stop. Thank god he is gone and now he will be sent to jail! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted April 4, 2017 Author Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted April 4, 2017 Just now, Anler said: That Obama was a tenacious mother fucker. I dont think he ever slept, he just did illegal shit 24/7! He's listening in on everybody, forcing liberal agendas down our throat, trying to infiltrate his muslim brotherhood into our govt, conspiring with Iran, tanking the economy, taking our guns... Its just non-stop. Thank god he is gone and now he will be sent to jail! You are about as bi-polar as Ben at times. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Skidooski Posted April 4, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted April 4, 2017 1 hour ago, Highmark said: You are about as bi-polar as Ben at times. Sarcasm and bi-polar....2 different things yeah Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.