Jump to content

To the Parlor, FB, Twitter whiners here...


Recommended Posts

When you sign up for these sites you agree to their terms which all include their right to remove violent content. Yes Parlor has one but they ignored their own agreement of use. So others took their measures to enforce them by limiting their uses.

So once again I will say if you don’t like them don’t fuckin use them.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Mainecat said:

When you sign up for these sites you agree to their terms which all include their right to remove violent content. Yes Parlor has one but they ignored their own agreement of use. So others took their measures to enforce them by limiting their uses.

So once again I will say if you don’t like them don’t fuckin use them.

Thats the thing they though....they are not consistent.... they only remove anything that hurts the left.

Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Dave said:

Thats the thing they though....they are not consistent.... they only remove anything that hurts the left.

Dave who’s inciting violence-

Me when I tell you I am going to blow up your home.

Or you when you reply to me telling me I’m going to do the same.

Whos inciting violence?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Mainecat said:

When you sign up for these sites you agree to their terms which all include their right to remove violent content. Yes Parlor has one but they ignored their own agreement of use. So others took their measures to enforce them by limiting their uses.

So once again I will say if you don’t like them don’t fuckin use them.

Why haven't any of them been taken down or taken action against the other groups that have organized and incited violence this past year(s)?

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Mainecat said:

Dave who’s inciting violence-

Me when I tell you I am going to blow up your home.

Or you when you reply to me telling me I’m going to do the same.

Whos inciting violence?

 

 

Both

You forget all the things your side has said in the past conviently....and yes they were members of congress.

Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Mainecat said:

Dave who’s inciting violence-

Me when I tell you I am going to blow up your home.

Or you when you reply to me telling me I’m going to do the same.

Whos inciting violence?

 

Just pulled this off You Tube. How old is this and why is it still up then? You guys are fucking windbag dolts. STFU already. 
 

 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
47 minutes ago, Mainecat said:

When you sign up for these sites you agree to their terms which all include their right to remove violent content. Yes Parlor has one but they ignored their own agreement of use. So others took their measures to enforce them by limiting their uses.

So once again I will say if you don’t like them don’t fuckin use them.

you're taking the position that these companies can do this because they are private companies?

asking for a colorado baker.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

       an open and direct threat to all Trump supporters and nothing about suspending or banning her.  Trump tells people to stand up, be heard but be respectful and hes facing impeachment from a lying fucking hag that should be impeached herself.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 4
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Mainecat said:

When you sign up for these sites you agree to their terms which all include their right to remove violent content. Yes Parlor has one but they ignored their own agreement of use. So others took their measures to enforce them by limiting their uses.

So once again I will say if you don’t like them don’t fuckin use them.

Do you see the word you used twice "their terms and their right" What gives someone else the right to enforce anything?

Mull on that and see if it sinks in, I seriously doubt it will. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know why you guys even bother? MC is the most brainwashed and deluded member this site has. Personally, I feel sorry for him for the fact he is entirely incapable of thinking for himself and can't see what is right in front of his eyes. 

 

demsss3.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, irv said:

I don't know why you guys even bother? MC is the most brainwashed and deluded member this site has. Personally, I feel sorry for him for the fact he is entirely incapable of thinking for himself and can't see what is right in front of his eyes. 

 

demsss3.jpg

Seriously? Hes never left....I'd say Slinger Toolkit and Barbiehands are a touch ahead of MC.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Their section 230 protections must be revoked at this point.  They've chosen to be content editors and therefore must be regulated as such.  Can't have it both ways.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Matt said:

Their section 230 protections must be revoked at this point.  They've chosen to be content editors and therefore must be regulated as such.  Can't have it both ways.

That will only serve to create more censorship. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
48 minutes ago, ActionfigureJoe said:

That will only serve to create more censorship. 

Exactly.

The morons here crying they lost their place to read violent acts or see photos of violent acts or connecting with other morons should just shut the fuck up.

 

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Mainecat said:

Dave who’s inciting violence-

Me when I tell you I am going to blow up your home.

Or you when you reply to me telling me I’m going to do the same.

Whos inciting violence?

 

BLM protests that turned to violence and looting were organized on social platforms.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, ActionfigureJoe said:

The US government has absolutely no say who a corporation wants to do business with. It’s ridiculous to even propose such a thing. 

WEll that's not exactly true. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, steve from amherst said:

WEll that's not exactly true. 

Supreme Court has already ruled on this. 

Edited by ActionfigureJoe
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, steve from amherst said:

THey said a baker can decide not to bake a gay cake?

Yes

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, irv said:

I don't know why you guys even bother? MC is the most brainwashed and deluded member this site has. Personally, I feel sorry for him for the fact he is entirely incapable of thinking for himself and can't see what is right in front of his eyes. 

 

demsss3.jpg

He's a soft target and prides himself on saying stupid shit. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Trying to pay the bills, lol

×
×
  • Create New...