Mainecat Posted January 29, 2020 Share Posted January 29, 2020 https://www.foxnews.com/us/deadliest-u-s-cities Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anler Posted January 29, 2020 Share Posted January 29, 2020 Damn those are all red states Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member steve from amherst Posted January 29, 2020 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted January 29, 2020 Mr.F'erLeader 4m Huh. Wonder what they all have in common? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SVT MXZ XRS Posted January 29, 2020 Share Posted January 29, 2020 5 minutes ago, steve from amherst said: Mr.F'erLeader 4m Huh. Wonder what they all have in common? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted January 29, 2020 Author Share Posted January 29, 2020 Good guys with guns? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spin_dry Posted January 29, 2020 Share Posted January 29, 2020 I thought Chicago was a war zone according to some of the fags here. Deadlier than kirkuk they say. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Momorider Posted January 29, 2020 Share Posted January 29, 2020 18 minutes ago, SVT MXZ XRS said: Starts with N ends with iggers? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ez ryder Posted January 29, 2020 Share Posted January 29, 2020 (edited) 57 minutes ago, spin_dry said: I thought Chicago was a war zone according to some of the fags here. Deadlier than kirkuk they say. it is a bullshit percentage per 100k game not acctual number of killings think chi town was like 560 last yr . yeah sweet place to bring up a family Edited January 29, 2020 by Ez ryder 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ez ryder Posted January 29, 2020 Share Posted January 29, 2020 (edited) 1 hour ago, spin_dry said: I thought Chicago was a war zone according to some of the fags here. Deadlier than kirkuk they say. looks like all of LA has less murders than just chi town . so lime i sad bull shit numbers game Edited January 29, 2020 by Ez ryder 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted January 29, 2020 Share Posted January 29, 2020 So nobody’s done the obvious breakdown yet? I’d bet all these shit holes have two things in common: Dem leadership for years if not decades, and “constituents” (wink,wink) of the same base. Meh, maybe I’ll do it later...but we all know it’s not necessary....even if some of us will deflect and deny to the very end. Am. EYE. Ryte? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
washedupmxer Posted January 29, 2020 Share Posted January 29, 2020 8 hours ago, Anler said: Damn those are all red states Cities it's about cities and they are all blue The next shocking part is they use guns 😂 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted January 29, 2020 Author Share Posted January 29, 2020 9 hours ago, spin_dry said: I thought Chicago was a war zone according to some of the fags here. Deadlier than kirkuk they say. Now you sent them out to kill to get the numbers up in Chicago. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted January 29, 2020 Share Posted January 29, 2020 9 hours ago, spin_dry said: I thought Chicago was a war zone according to some of the fags here. Deadlier than kirkuk they say. It's one of the 500 runner up cities. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted January 29, 2020 Share Posted January 29, 2020 LOL...stupid pants shitter posts some shit he thinks is a "win" somehow. Spiinner jumps in and tells MC this is really damning toward the Dem party and their base. Shifting starts but OOOPS...too late. SO...let's see with some quick "googly" what we have with these "TOP 5 DEADLIEST" City Dem run since AA population 5, Baton Rouge 2005 59% 4. New Orleans 1972 60% 3. Detroit 1970 84% 2. Baltimore 1971 65% 1. St. Louis 1949 49% Now, I know many here will be triggered by this...too bad. Facts are facts. Also, some of you will try to break this down by any means to try and dissipate these numbers to cover, be my guest. But, I'd again bet I know what those numbers will show also. Also, Chicago, like many other cities has a metro area that far exceeds the actual city limits. When you factor in metro statistics of these large metro areas, the "Most deadliest" will probably change. Chicago population = 2.7 mil Chicago metro population = 9.5 mil Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.