revrnd Posted December 20, 2017 Author Share Posted December 20, 2017 1 minute ago, 02sled said: That explains a lot... no wonder Fail claims 45% in one post then minutes later says that my math is off and when I show him the numbers his way it comes out at 40% not 45% He can never keep anything straight in his head for more than a couple of minutes. Reminds me of the Kelly Bundy syndrome. The brain can only hold so much. Put something more in and something falls out. Laugh of the day! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
02sled Posted December 20, 2017 Share Posted December 20, 2017 17 minutes ago, 1trailmaker said: I will just let you keep looking stupid all by yourself Okay dumb as a stump Fail.... show us your math that comes out to 45%. I won't hold my breath because once again as usual you are deflecting from the fact YOU CAN'T ADD SUBTRACT OR MULTIPLY EVEN WITH A CALCULATOR AND YOU F'D UP AS USUAL. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1trailmaker Posted December 20, 2017 Share Posted December 20, 2017 1 hour ago, 02sled said: More Fail from his over active over fertile imagination. You state that corp taxes will drop from 35% to 21% which is a 14% reduction. Then hours later you claim a massive 45% reduction. keep flapping 02sled Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted December 20, 2017 Share Posted December 20, 2017 21 minutes ago, 1trailmaker said: June 21st is summer, if he fails at this he will be voted out This should be done as soon as possible The senate has made it clear, they don't care about an artificial date. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
02sled Posted December 20, 2017 Share Posted December 20, 2017 8 minutes ago, 1trailmaker said: HOw is that not true? A PM spending his house budget has nothing to do with child tax credits or being subsidized Are your business lunches subsidized ? or is it apart of the job so are you a free loader or not? Dumb as a stump Fail continues... I took a lunch to work daily. The company paid for lunch when I was traveling and didn't have the option of taking lunch with me. Coming from you the term Freeloader is a joke.... where are you... oh that's right.... at your job.... not at work because you don't actually work... you just warm a seat and post on the forum at taxpayer expense all day. Your boss probably lets you get away with it because your shitty productivity makes his productivity appear as though he's a shining star. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1trailmaker Posted December 20, 2017 Share Posted December 20, 2017 Just now, ArcticCrusher said: The senate has made it clear, they don't care about an artificial date. why would they? these law makers will do when and only when all their buddies are setup to cash in - Plus they need to figure out what to do with Cops that will no longer wasting time on Pot charges Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1trailmaker Posted December 20, 2017 Share Posted December 20, 2017 2 minutes ago, 02sled said: Dumb as a stump Fail continues... I took a lunch to work daily. The company paid for lunch when I was traveling and didn't have the option of taking lunch with me. Coming from you the term Freeloader is a joke.... where are you... oh that's right.... at your job.... not at work because you don't actually work... you just warm a seat and post on the forum at taxpayer expense all day. Your boss probably lets you get away with it because your shitty productivity makes his productivity appear as though he's a shining star. it was a simple question 02sled, just because you got a beat down there isn't a need to talk about my job Explain how the PM and child tax credits are connected Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
02sled Posted December 20, 2017 Share Posted December 20, 2017 8 minutes ago, 1trailmaker said: Cliff you said it dropped 14% - you are wrong period no discussion Poor Poor Fail. I said they are paying 14% less which is true. You couldn't be any more stupid if you tried. You specifically stated massive 45% - then you asked what is 14% of 35% trying to justify yourself for the 45%.... Guess what dumb ass. 14 / 35 is what.... oh that's right. 40% not the 45% you posted. You couldn't be any more wrong in your math and still refuse to admit it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
02sled Posted December 20, 2017 Share Posted December 20, 2017 The ethics commission report was just posted that Trudope broke the ethics regulations by accepting the vacation from the Aga Khan and he failed to recuse himself from discussions around the Aga Khan foundation. Guilty as sin. I can hardly wait for him to make up excuses between ums and ahs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1trailmaker Posted December 20, 2017 Share Posted December 20, 2017 CBC bias report on Trudeau's trip last Christmas wah witch hunt witch hunt leave Stephen I mean Justin alone report is out just trying to find it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
02sled Posted December 20, 2017 Share Posted December 20, 2017 14 minutes ago, 1trailmaker said: keep flapping 02sled If they are paying 14% less money today than they were yesterday what is that besides a reduction in the amount they pay of 14% Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1trailmaker Posted December 20, 2017 Share Posted December 20, 2017 5 minutes ago, 02sled said: Poor Poor Fail. I said they are paying 14% less which is true. You couldn't be any more stupid if you tried. You specifically stated massive 45% - then you asked what is 14% of 35% trying to justify yourself for the 45%.... Guess what dumb ass. 14 / 35 is what.... oh that's right. 40% not the 45% you posted. You couldn't be any more wrong in your math and still refuse to admit it. Everyone here read what you said - you were way off Move on to something else or go back to arguing against min. wage increases while defending massive tax breaks for the wealthy Just like you can continue to look stupid on another topic Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
revrnd Posted December 20, 2017 Author Share Posted December 20, 2017 4 minutes ago, 1trailmaker said: CBC bias report on Trudeau's trip last Christmas wah witch hunt witch hunt leave Stephen I mean Justin alone report is out just trying to find it No hits on CBC try this: https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/trudeau-broke-ethics-rules-watchdog-finds-1.3729662 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
02sled Posted December 20, 2017 Share Posted December 20, 2017 (edited) Here it is Fail... on the ethics commissioner web site. Can't get any more unbiased than the actual report itself http://ciec-ccie.parl.gc.ca/Documents/English/Public Reports/Examination Reports/The Trudeau Report.pdf Not looking good for Trudope. Broke the rules according to the ethics commissioner in more than one way and his now deceased buddy under investigation for breaking the fundraising and lobbying rules with Trudope. Edited December 20, 2017 by 02sled Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1trailmaker Posted December 20, 2017 Share Posted December 20, 2017 3 minutes ago, 02sled said: If they are paying 14% less money today than they were yesterday what is that besides a reduction in the amount they pay of 14% if a person makes 70% of the bosses salary and gets a 14% raise are they now making 84% of the bosses salary you are funny and love when you back pedal Kind of like when you said 85% of Canadians don't have cell service Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1trailmaker Posted December 20, 2017 Share Posted December 20, 2017 1 minute ago, revrnd said: No hits on CBC try this: https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/trudeau-broke-ethics-rules-watchdog-finds-1.3729662 I was looking for the actual report that was posted on government website Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
02sled Posted December 20, 2017 Share Posted December 20, 2017 1 minute ago, 1trailmaker said: if a person makes 70% of the bosses salary and gets a 14% raise are they now making 84% of the bosses salary you are funny and love when you back pedal Kind of like when you said 85% of Canadians don't have cell service Fail admit it... you can't do math period. For you 12 + 13 is a problem. You run out of fingers and toes at 20. Go back to warming your seat and pretending to work Kelly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
02sled Posted December 20, 2017 Share Posted December 20, 2017 2 minutes ago, 1trailmaker said: I was looking for the actual report that was posted on government website Fuck Fail... I just gave you exactly that... more proof you can't read. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1trailmaker Posted December 20, 2017 Share Posted December 20, 2017 Just now, 02sled said: Fail admit it... you can't do math period. For you 12 + 13 is a problem. You run out of fingers and toes at 20. Go back to warming your seat and pretending to work Kelly. sure go with that - everyone here knows what you said and that will not change move on 02sled you win Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
revrnd Posted December 20, 2017 Author Share Posted December 20, 2017 https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/on-aga-khan-s-birthday-christmas-holiday-controversy-still-haunts-trudeau-1.3721178 Quote "Canada and the world are stronger and richer because of his commitment to diversity and inclusion Does something lose its meaning if it is repeated ad nauseum? Regardless of the situation or topic of the moment, politicians have to trot this out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
02sled Posted December 20, 2017 Share Posted December 20, 2017 (edited) 74 page report showing Trudope screwed up big time. Edited December 20, 2017 by 02sled Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sksman Posted December 20, 2017 Share Posted December 20, 2017 54 minutes ago, 1trailmaker said: douche flap, you have to dig deeper I see you are completely okay with hiring a chef, but not a nanny - interesting Are you okay with the budget given to the PM family? or just not the one Trudeau has? Funny you think Stephen can't pour his own bowl of cereal in the morning and are cheering his Chef doing it no ONEWAY here Poor Fail. Trudeau has a chef and 2 (special assistants) nannies. But we can understand Trudeau not being allowed in the kitchen as we try to keep children away from sharp objects and doing tough chores like opening the top of cereal box and not the bottom. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1trailmaker Posted December 20, 2017 Share Posted December 20, 2017 1 minute ago, Sksman said: Poor Fail. Trudeau has a chef and 2 (special assistants) nannies. But we can understand Trudeau not being allowed in the kitchen as we try to keep children away from sharp objects and doing tough chores like opening the top of cereal box and not the bottom. I really don't care how the PM house money is spent - makes no difference to what the taxpayer is forking out Why are you okay with having a chef but not a nanny 02ool can't answer and I assume you will not either Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Usedtoskidoo Posted December 20, 2017 Share Posted December 20, 2017 https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/trudeau-violated-conflict-of-interest-law-with-aga-khan-trip-ethics-watchdog-says/article37393519/ Hmmmmmmm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted December 20, 2017 Share Posted December 20, 2017 Oh noes. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.