ArcticCrusher Posted December 20, 2017 Share Posted December 20, 2017 21 minutes ago, 1trailmaker said: I really don't care how the PM house money is spent - makes no difference to what the taxpayer is forking out Why are you okay with having a chef but not a nanny 02ool can't answer and I assume you will not either I do. Especially from a hypocrite. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted December 20, 2017 Share Posted December 20, 2017 #2 will be Morneau. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1trailmaker Posted December 20, 2017 Share Posted December 20, 2017 26 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said: I do. Especially from a hypocrite. so you are okay with a chef? how about a cleaning maid? gardener? I assume everything but a nanny Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Usedtoskidoo Posted December 20, 2017 Share Posted December 20, 2017 1 hour ago, ArcticCrusher said: Oh noes. yup. only took them just under 12 months to figure out what we knew in a few minutes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1trailmaker Posted December 20, 2017 Share Posted December 20, 2017 8 minutes ago, Usedtoskidoo said: yup. only took them just under 12 months to figure out what we knew in a few minutes which was what? I already see the twisted shit on Facebook. So I ask you What did we know? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted December 20, 2017 Share Posted December 20, 2017 55 minutes ago, 1trailmaker said: so you are okay with a chef? how about a cleaning maid? gardener? I assume everything but a nanny Nannies are modern day slaves. Did they leave their kids and husbands behind so they can be Sophie's servants. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sksman Posted December 20, 2017 Share Posted December 20, 2017 1 hour ago, 1trailmaker said: I really don't care how the PM house money is spent - makes no difference to what the taxpayer is forking out Why are you okay with having a chef but not a nanny 02ool can't answer and I assume you will not either I am confused Fail. Its not okay for Harper to have a chef as you commented above. Then it was Harper had a Chef and that’s ok as Trudeau has nannies. Now it’s you don’t care about the PM household budget. Please make a statement, stick to it, and just admit when your wrong. It’s not that tough is it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Usedtoskidoo Posted December 20, 2017 Share Posted December 20, 2017 15 minutes ago, 1trailmaker said: which was what? I already see the twisted shit on Facebook. So I ask you What did we know? go away Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1trailmaker Posted December 20, 2017 Share Posted December 20, 2017 3 minutes ago, Sksman said: I am confused Fail. Its not okay for Harper to have a chef as you commented above. Then it was Harper had a Chef and that’s ok as Trudeau has nannies. Now it’s you don’t care about the PM household budget. Please make a statement, stick to it, and just admit when your wrong. It’s not that tough is it? I have never complained about any chef or nanny that is your department (well for liberals only) I don't care how the budget for PM house is spent - nothing has changed with my opinion Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1trailmaker Posted December 20, 2017 Share Posted December 20, 2017 3 minutes ago, Usedtoskidoo said: go away so taking a private air craft without permission is this the big one for you? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1trailmaker Posted December 20, 2017 Share Posted December 20, 2017 (edited) 10 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said: Nannies are modern day slaves. Did they leave their kids and husbands behind so they can be Sophie's servants. Isn't that what every working parent does so every one else working there is okay other than the nanny? Edited December 20, 2017 by 1trailmaker Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted December 20, 2017 Share Posted December 20, 2017 43 minutes ago, 1trailmaker said: Isn't that what every working parent does so every one else working there is okay other than the nanny? No they leave them back in their home country. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
02sled Posted December 20, 2017 Share Posted December 20, 2017 1 hour ago, 1trailmaker said: so you are okay with a chef? how about a cleaning maid? gardener? I assume everything but a nanny Nobody would likely have said boo about a nanny for the 3 kids but Trudope has to have two of them one for day time and one for night time while he trumpets how in touch he is with the average Canadian. Something like his claim around immigration. Remember that one The Immigrant Experience: In Dartmouth, a 25-year-old man who identified himself as an Italian citizen complained about the hoops he was going through to become a Canadian citizen. Trudeau started his reply this way: “I’m a 10th- or 11th-generation Canadian on one of my sides but my maternal grandfather was born in Scotland so I do have some idea of the challenges it takes to come to Canada and has took over the sweep of history of Canada.” Huh? The grandfather in question was James Sinclair, born in Banff, Scotland, in 1908, who arrived in Canada with his family when he was three. He adjusted to life as an immigrant so well that he served as an MP from B.C. for 18 years, a career that had been over for 15 years before Trudeau was born. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1trailmaker Posted December 20, 2017 Share Posted December 20, 2017 9 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said: No they leave them back in their home country. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
02sled Posted December 20, 2017 Share Posted December 20, 2017 1 hour ago, Sksman said: I am confused Fail. Its not okay for Harper to have a chef as you commented above. Then it was Harper had a Chef and that’s ok as Trudeau has nannies. Now it’s you don’t care about the PM household budget. Please make a statement, stick to it, and just admit when your wrong. It’s not that tough is it? Sure it is... he can't remember what he posted 10 minutes ago. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1trailmaker Posted December 20, 2017 Share Posted December 20, 2017 2 minutes ago, 02sled said: Sure it is... he can't remember what he posted 10 minutes ago. What I wrote hasn't been edited so go read it, SK did the same thing in the other thread you guys pick and choose what you don't like and it changes daily - so glad I am not a ONEWAY I like knowing I will have a choice who to vote for in elections. Scheer has been great so far don't you think? your idea of PM material not that it matters as your vote is already cast Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
02sled Posted December 20, 2017 Share Posted December 20, 2017 I see Fail has yet to comment on the most recent damming report from the Ethics Commissioner Mary Dawson regarding his bromance partner (Do No Wrong Trudope) clearly violating the ethics rules in more ways than one. He shouldn't have gone on the free vacation and he should have recused himself from participating in discussions around funding to the Aga Khans Foundation. http://ciec-ccie.parl.gc.ca/Documents/English/Public Reports/Examination Reports/The Trudeau Report.pdf Then the most recent revelation that Barry Sherman was under investigation for breaking the lobbying rules as they pertained to a Do No Wrong Trudope fundraiser. https://www.thestar.com/news/gta/2017/12/19/barry-sherman-was-under-investigation-for-breaking-lobbying-rules.html You would think of all people the PM would have enough sense to avoid the obvious. So Fail... how come you have been conspicuously silent on these topics that cast your hero in such a dim light? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1trailmaker Posted December 20, 2017 Share Posted December 20, 2017 2 minutes ago, 02sled said: I see Fail has yet to comment on the most recent damming report from the Ethics Commissioner Mary Dawson regarding his bromance partner (Do No Wrong Trudope) clearly violating the ethics rules in more ways than one. He shouldn't have gone on the free vacation and he should have recused himself from participating in discussions around funding to the Aga Khans Foundation. http://ciec-ccie.parl.gc.ca/Documents/English/Public Reports/Examination Reports/The Trudeau Report.pdf Then the most recent revelation that Barry Sherman was under investigation for breaking the lobbying rules as they pertained to a Do No Wrong Trudope fundraiser. https://www.thestar.com/news/gta/2017/12/19/barry-sherman-was-under-investigation-for-breaking-lobbying-rules.html You would think of all people the PM would have enough sense to avoid the obvious. So Fail... how come you have been conspicuously silent on these topics that cast your hero in such a dim light? we already knew what he did - what else is there to say? I don't care he took a helicopter - violation should have asked first I don't care he went to this Island I would care if this guy got new monies but he didn't, Canada has given to this guys foundation for many many years - but yea he should of not been apart of the discussions when is the hanging going to stat? In reality nothing was done wrong, nothing changed, Canada didn't lose money, no one lied Care level for this one is a 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
02sled Posted December 20, 2017 Share Posted December 20, 2017 4 minutes ago, 1trailmaker said: we already knew what he did - what else is there to say? I don't care he took a helicopter - violation should have asked first I don't care he went to this Island I would care if this guy got new monies but he didn't, Canada has given to this guys foundation for many many years - but yea he should of not been apart of the discussions when is the hanging going to stat? In reality nothing was done wrong, nothing changed, Canada didn't lose money, no one lied Care level for this one is a 1 Nothing was done wrong. Talk about one way... Your hero Trudope could get caught with his hands in the cookie jar lining his own pockets and you would say he did nothing wrong. You should send a letter to Mary Dawson and tell her that the results of her investigation and the contents of her report are incorrect. You know so much better than her and Trudope did no wrong. And of course Barry Sherman violating the lobbying rules with fundraising for Trudope is irrelevant as well. Lets forget Christmas and all worship the new Messiah according to Fail... his name is Justine Trudope. Whenever he does wrong or looks bad ONE WAY FAIL avoids it like the plague Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1trailmaker Posted December 20, 2017 Share Posted December 20, 2017 Some important things to note Section 14 Mr. Trudeau did not contravene section 14 of the Conflict of Interest Code for Members of the House of Commons (Members’ Code). Subsection 14(1) of the Members’ Code prohibits a Member and any member of the Member’s family from accepting, directly or indirectly, any gift or other benefit, except compensation authorized by law, that might reasonably be seen to have been given to influence the Member in the exercise of a duty or function of his or her office. Subsection 6(1) of the Act prohibits public office holders from making or participating in making a decision related to the exercise of an official power, duty or function if they know or reasonably should know that, in the making of the decision, they would be in a conflict of,interest. I found that Mr. Trudeau not contravene subsection 6(1). There was no evidence that Mr. Trudeau made or participated in making any decision in relation to the private interest of the Aga Khan or any of his institutions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1trailmaker Posted December 20, 2017 Share Posted December 20, 2017 1 minute ago, 02sled said: Nothing was done wrong. Talk about one way... Your hero Trudope could get caught with his hands in the cookie jar lining his own pockets and you would say he did nothing wrong. You should send a letter to Mary Dawson and tell her that the results of her investigation and the contents of her report are incorrect. You know so much better than her and Trudope did no wrong. And of course Barry Sherman violating the lobbying rules with fundraising for Trudope is irrelevant as well. Lets forget Christmas and all worship the new Messiah according to Fail... his name is Justine Trudope. Whenever he does wrong or looks bad ONE WAY FAIL avoids it like the plague all that posted wind and not one thing about the topic what is it that you are so upset with? not asking first to go in the helicopter? being in on the foundation talks? or just he is a liberal? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toslow Posted December 20, 2017 Share Posted December 20, 2017 2 minutes ago, 1trailmaker said: all that posted wind and not one thing about the topic what is it that you are so upset with? not asking first to go in the helicopter? being in on the foundation talks? or just he is a liberal? so now your saying the ethics commission is wrong Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toslow Posted December 20, 2017 Share Posted December 20, 2017 US$800 million Forbes describes the Aga Khan as one of the world's ten richest royals with an estimated net worth of US$800 million (2010). Additionally he is unique among the richest royals as he does not rule over a geographic territory. oh yeah let canada give this fucker more money 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
02sled Posted December 20, 2017 Share Posted December 20, 2017 3 minutes ago, 1trailmaker said: all that posted wind and not one thing about the topic what is it that you are so upset with? not asking first to go in the helicopter? being in on the foundation talks? or just he is a liberal? Read the report Fail. It's only 74 pages. You should have had time to do that after lunch. Firstly it's not just a helicopter ride. He shouldn't have taken the vacation period. Helicopter, accommodations, meals etc. for him and his family and staff. What I care about is the flagrant disregard for the rules by the hypocrite Trudope. Whenever questioned about it all he would do is his usual double speak. Then his lack of sense in not recusing himself from the discussions. This is the person we entrust to have enough good sense to run the country and he is too stupid to recognize gee... I took a freebie vacation from the Aga Khan, maybe just maybe I shouldn't be taking part in the discussions around funding his foundation. Even the mentally challenged should be able to recognize the conflict. You conveniently continue to ignore the investigation of Barry Sherman on the violation of the lobbying rules I see. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toslow Posted December 20, 2017 Share Posted December 20, 2017 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.