Trudope was too late with his carbon tax.........

[revkevsdi]

20 hours ago, ArcticCrusher said:

Its called climate change for a reason retard.

 

So the perma frost was always there?

 

14 hours ago, snopro31 said:

I’m just quoting this to bring it back to the top for @revkevsdi

 

10 hours ago, DUMPY said:

And exposes the frozen trees and mammoths under it?

 

9 hours ago, 1trailmaker said:

AC asked about permafrost 

Its melting and causing grief 

that is all I said 

 

I'm saying Cao and trade was good compared to carbon tax - ooth will have little affect on your day to day so I won't lose sleep 

 

Doug costs us everyday  

I was waiting for you dumbasses to realize what happens when the permafrost melts.

As usual you are stabbing around in the dark without a clue.

[Snake]

7 minutes ago, revkevsdi said:

 

 

 

I was waiting for you dumbasses to realize what happens when the permafrost melts.

As usual you are stabbing around in the dark without a clue.

It's warm out today. That will be $20 please.

[ArcticCrusher]

13 minutes ago, revkevsdi said:

 

 

 

I was waiting for you dumbasses to realize what happens when the permafrost melts.

As usual you are stabbing around in the dark without a clue.

The zero ClimateBeta thinks he's gonna stop that.

[revkevsdi]

34 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said:

The zero ClimateBeta thinks he's gonna stop that.

You flip flop from saying it exists and can’t be stopped to siding with Trump and saying it’s a hoax.  

 

[Rod]

56 minutes ago, revkevsdi said:

 

 

 

I was waiting for you dumbasses to realize what happens when the permafrost melts.

As usual you are stabbing around in the dark without a clue.

When permafrost melts it goes back to its original state 

[ArcticCrusher]

7 minutes ago, revkevsdi said:

You flip flop from saying it exists and can’t be stopped to siding with Trump and saying it’s a hoax.  

 

That man is the main driver?  Yes that is pure BS.  You can't stop the climate from changing.  Is that clear ClimateBetaBarbie?

[franks pond]

[franks pond]

[Tinker]

11 hours ago, revkevsdi said:

 

 

 

I was waiting for you dumbasses to realize what happens when the permafrost melts.

As usual you are stabbing around in the dark without a clue.

OMG tell your Mom n Dad I was just kidding about the Parma Frost thing, I feel terrible you took it seriously. I don't want their dreams shattered cuz they must have been so proud up until now. Big shout to Trail/Fail/WidowMaker of the Ontario Forum for some quality perspectives from so far in left field ya gotta look right to scratch your head. 

Now don't scratch too hard or you'll damage the Parma Scalp and the Follicle Tax is a whole nuther juggernaut... 

[revkevsdi]

11 hours ago, Tinker said:

OMG tell your Mom n Dad I was just kidding about the Parma Frost thing, I feel terrible you took it seriously. I don't want their dreams shattered cuz they must have been so proud up until now. Big shout to Trail/Fail/WidowMaker of the Ontario Forum for some quality perspectives from so far in left field ya gotta look right to scratch your head. 

Now don't scratch too hard or you'll damage the Parma Scalp and the Follicle Tax is a whole nuther juggernaut... 

Poor clown Posse.

"I agree with Trump, man made climate change is a Chinese Hoax, it's fake news I tell you"

"What's that? The Trump Whitehouse called it a very real threat to America?"

"Well, even if it is real, I know math and a Carbon tax will destroy the economy"  What's that? Actual economists have claimed it will work?'  

"But But we called a member of Trudeau's cabinet climate Barbie, we have to be right"

"Man made climate change isn't real it's made up so researchers can make money from universities, it's been questioned by people who get money from the fossil fuel industry. If it is real we can't do anything about it and if we can do something about it a proven carbon tax won't help. Anyone who doesn't believe that is stoopid"

Fun Thread. Keep it up Clowns. 

 

[irv]

15 minutes ago, revkevsdi said:

Poor clown Posse.

"I agree with Trump, man made climate change is a Chinese Hoax, it's fake news I tell you"

"What's that? The Trump Whitehouse called it a very real threat to America?"

"Well, even if it is real, I know math and a Carbon tax will destroy the economy"  What's that? Actual economists have claimed it will work?'  

"But But we called a member of Trudeau's cabinet climate Barbie, we have to be right"

"Man made climate change isn't real it's made up so researchers can make money from universities, it's been questioned by people who get money from the fossil fuel industry. If it is real we can't do anything about it and if we can do something about it a proven carbon tax won't help. Anyone who doesn't believe that is stoopid"

Fun Thread. Keep it up Clowns. 

 

So Kevvy, in what years was the climate actual stable? You know, years where we had zero storms, hurricanes, floods, forest fires, droughts, heat waves, earthquakes and volcanic eruptions? 

I know you won't answer because you can't, but while you're fabbing up some other B.S. story about the scientists and economists, please, again, tell me how having a carbon tax is going to stop these natural occurrences from happening?

 

[revkevsdi]

27 minutes ago, irv said:

So Kevvy, in what years was the climate actual stable? You know, years where we had zero storms, hurricanes, floods, forest fires, droughts, heat waves, earthquakes and volcanic eruptions? 

I know you won't answer because you can't, but while you're fabbing up some other B.S. story about the scientists and economists, please, again, tell me how having a carbon tax is going to stop these natural occurrences from happening?

 

Your "very scientific" you tube video quoted the IPCC report.  Yet here is info from the actual report.

“One of the key messages that comes out very strongly from this report is that we are already seeing the consequences of 1°C of global warming through more extreme weather, rising sea levels and diminishing Arctic sea ice, among other changes,” said Panmao Zhai, Co-Chair of IPCC Working Group I.

The report highlights a number of climate change impacts that could be avoided by limiting global warming to 1.5°C compared to 2°C, or more. For instance, by 2100, global sea level rise would be 10 cm lower with global warming of 1.5°C compared with 2°C. The likelihood of an Arctic Ocean free of sea ice in summer would be once per century with global warming of 1.5°C, compared with at least once per decade with 2°C. Coral reefs would decline by 70-90 percent with global warming of 1.5°C, whereas virtually all (> 99 percent) would be lost with 2°C.

“Every extra bit of warming matters, especially since warming of 1.5°C or higher increases the risk associated with long-lasting or irreversible changes, such as the loss of some ecosystems,” said Hans-Otto Pörtner, Co-Chair of IPCC Working Group II.

Limiting global warming would also give people and ecosystems more room to adapt and remain below relevant risk thresholds, added Pörtner. The report also examines pathways available to limit warming to 1.5°C, what it would take to achieve them and what the consequences could be. “The good news is that some of the kinds of actions that would be needed to limit global warming to 1.5°C are already underway around the world, but they would need to accelerate,” said Valerie Masson-Delmotte, Co-Chair of Working Group I.

The report finds that limiting global warming to 1.5°C would require “rapid and far-reaching” transitions in land, energy, industry, buildings, transport, and cities. Global net human-caused emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) would need to fall by about 45 percent from 2010 levels by 2030, reaching ‘net zero’ around 2050. This means that any remaining emissions would need to be balanced by removing CO2 from the air.

“Limiting warming to 1.5°C is possible within the laws of chemistry and physics but doing so would require unprecedented changes,” said Jim Skea, Co-Chair of IPCC Working Group III.

Allowing the global temperature to temporarily exceed or ‘overshoot’ 1.5°C would mean a greater reliance on techniques that remove CO2 from the air to return global temperature to below 1.5°C by 2100. The effectiveness of such techniques are unproven at large scale and some may carry significant risks for sustainable development, the report notes.

“Limiting global warming to 1.5°C compared with 2°C would reduce challenging impacts on ecosystems, human health and well-being, making it easier to achieve the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals,” said Priyardarshi Shukla, Co-Chair of IPCC Working Group III.

The decisions we make today are critical in ensuring a safe and sustainable world for everyone, both now and in the future, said Debra Roberts, Co-Chair of IPCC Working Group II.

“This report gives policymakers and practitioners the information they need to make decisions that tackle climate change while considering local context and people’s needs. The next few years are probably the most important in our history,” she said.

The IPCC is the leading world body for assessing the science related to climate change, its impacts and potential future risks, and possible response options.

The report was prepared under the scientific leadership of all three IPCC working groups. Working Group I assesses the physical science basis of climate change; Working Group II addresses impacts, adaptation and vulnerability; and Working Group III deals with the mitigation of climate change.

The Paris Agreement adopted by 195 nations at the 21st Conference of the Parties to the UNFCCC in December 2015 included the aim of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change by “holding the increase in the global average temperature to well below 2°C above pre-industrial levels and pursuing efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels.”

As part of the decision to adopt the Paris Agreement, the IPCC was invited to produce, in 2018, a Special Report on global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways. The IPCC accepted the invitation, adding that the Special Report would look at these issues in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty.

Global Warming of 1.5°C is the first in a series of Special Reports to be produced in the IPCC’s Sixth Assessment Cycle. Next year the IPCC will release the Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate, and Climate Change and Land, which looks at how climate change affects land use.

The Summary for Policymakers (SPM) presents the key findings of the Special Report, based on the assessment of the available scientific, technical and socio-economic literature relevant to global warming of 1.5°C.

The Summary for Policymakers of the Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5°C (SR15) is available at https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15 or www.ipcc.ch.

Key statistics of the Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5°C

91 authors from 44 citizenships and 40 countries of residence
– 14 Coordinating Lead Authors (CLAs)
– 60 Lead authors (LAs)
– 17 Review Editors (REs)

133 Contributing authors (CAs)
Over 6,000 cited references
A total of 42,001 expert and government review comments
(First Order Draft 12,895; Second Order Draft 25,476; Final Government Draft: 3,630)

For more information, contact:
IPCC Press Office, Email: ipcc-media@wmo.int
Werani Zabula +41 79 108 3157 or Nina Peeva +41 79 516 7068

Notes for editors

The Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5 °C, known as SR15, is being prepared in response to an invitation from the 21st Conference of the Parties (COP21) to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change in December 2015, when they reached the Paris Agreement, and will inform the Talanoa Dialogue at the 24th Conference of the Parties (COP24). The Talanoa Dialogue will take stock of the collective efforts of Parties in relation to progress towards the long-term goal of the Paris Agreement, and to inform the preparation of nationally determined contributions. Details of the report, including the approved outline, can be found on the report page. The report was prepared under the joint scientific leadership of all three IPCC Working Groups, with support from the Working Group I Technical Support Unit.

What is the IPCC?
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is the UN body for assessing the science related to climate change. It was established by the United Nations Environment Programme (UN Environment) and the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) in 1988 to provide policymakers with regular scientific assessments concerning climate change, its implications and potential future risks, as well as to put forward adaptation and mitigation strategies. It has 195 member states.

IPCC assessments provide governments, at all levels, with scientific information that they can use to develop climate policies. IPCC assessments are a key input into the international negotiations to tackle climate change. IPCC reports are drafted and reviewed in several stages, thus guaranteeing objectivity and transparency.

The IPCC assesses the thousands of scientific papers published each year to tell policymakers what we know and don’t know about the risks related to climate change. The IPCC identifies where there is agreement in the scientific community, where there are differences of opinion, and where further research is needed. It does not conduct its own research.

To produce its reports, the IPCC mobilizes hundreds of scientists. These scientists and officials are drawn from diverse backgrounds. Only a dozen permanent staff work in the IPCC’s Secretariat.

The IPCC has three working groups: Working Group I, dealing with the physical science basis of climate change; Working Group II, dealing with impacts, adaptation and vulnerability; and Working Group III, dealing with the mitigation of climate change. It also has a Task Force on National Greenhouse Gas Inventories that develops methodologies for measuring emissions and removals.

IPCC Assessment Reports consist of contributions from each of the three working groups and a Synthesis Report. Special Reports undertake an assessment of cross-disciplinary issues that span more than one working group and are shorter and more focused than the main assessments.

Sixth Assessment Cycle
At its 41st Session in February 2015, the IPCC decided to produce a Sixth Assessment Report (AR6). At its 42nd Session in October 2015 it elected a new Bureau that would oversee the work on this report and Special Reports to be produced in the assessment cycle. At its 43rd Session in April 2016, it decided to produce three Special Reports, a Methodology Report and AR6.

The Methodology Report to refine the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories will be delivered in 2019. Besides Global Warming of 1.5°C, the IPCC will finalize two further special reports in 2019: the Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate and Climate Change and Land: an IPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems. The AR6 Synthesis Report will be finalized in the first half of 2022, following the three working group contributions to AR6 in 2021.

For more information, including links to the IPCC reports, go to: www.ipcc.ch

DATE

October 8, 2018

DOWNLOADS

• Press Release in English 
• Press Release in Arabic 
• Press Release in Chinese 
• Press Release in French 
• Press Release in Russian 
• Press Release in Spanish 
• Summary for Policymakers (English)

WORKING GROUP

• Working Group I
• Working Group 
•  

[irv]

And the IPCC is nothing more than a economic entity.  

The IPCC does not carry out original research, nor does it monitor climate or related phenomena itself. Rather, it assesses published literature including peer-reviewed and non-peer-reviewed sources.^[8] However, the IPCC can be said to stimulate research in climate science. Chapters of IPCC reports often close with sections on limitations and knowledge or research gaps, and the announcement of an IPCC special report can catalyse research activity in that area.

This is all you should need to know but since Gore is another hero of your's, you probably take it as gospel. 

 The 2007 Nobel Peace Prizewas shared, in equal parts, between the IPCC and Al Gore.^[12]

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/aug/2/al-gores-nashville-estate-expends-21-times-more-en/

[Tinker]

1 hour ago, revkevsdi said:

Poor clown Posse.

"I agree with Trump, man made climate change is a Chinese Hoax, it's fake news I tell you"

"What's that? The Trump Whitehouse called it a very real threat to America?"

"Well, even if it is real, I know math and a Carbon tax will destroy the economy"  What's that? Actual economists have claimed it will work?'  

"But But we called a member of Trudeau's cabinet climate Barbie, we have to be right"

"Man made climate change isn't real it's made up so researchers can make money from universities, it's been questioned by people who get money from the fossil fuel industry. If it is real we can't do anything about it and if we can do something about it a proven carbon tax won't help. Anyone who doesn't believe that is stoopid"

Fun Thread. Keep it up Clowns. 

 

I expected better from you... Straight to Bad Orange Man but once again what does that have to do with a tax that has no criteria, agenda or ability to reduce carbon emission. Staying off the internet and sucking farts out of cows would be more productive

 

[Snake]

1 hour ago, revkevsdi said:

Poor clown Posse.

"I agree with Trump, man made climate change is a Chinese Hoax, it's fake news I tell you"

"What's that? The Trump Whitehouse called it a very real threat to America?"

"Well, even if it is real, I know math and a Carbon tax will destroy the economy"  What's that? Actual economists have claimed it will work?'  

"But But we called a member of Trudeau's cabinet climate Barbie, we have to be right"

"Man made climate change isn't real it's made up so researchers can make money from universities, it's been questioned by people who get money from the fossil fuel industry. If it is real we can't do anything about it and if we can do something about it a proven carbon tax won't help. Anyone who doesn't believe that is stoopid"

Fun Thread. Keep it up Clowns. 

 

The sun is out today.

That'll be $35.

[snopro31]

It’s May 4 and woke up to snow again. 

 

 

[ManOnManOral]

Revkev is a tool kit dupe

[revkevsdi]

6 hours ago, irv said:

And the IPCC is nothing more than a economic entity.  

The IPCC does not carry out original research, nor does it monitor climate or related phenomena itself. Rather, it assesses published literature including peer-reviewed and non-peer-reviewed sources.^[8] However, the IPCC can be said to stimulate research in climate science. Chapters of IPCC reports often close with sections on limitations and knowledge or research gaps, and the announcement of an IPCC special report can catalyse research activity in that area.

This is all you should need to know but since Gore is another hero of your's, you probably take it as gospel. 

 The 2007 Nobel Peace Prizewas shared, in equal parts, between the IPCC and Al Gore.^[12]

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/aug/2/al-gores-nashville-estate-expends-21-times-more-en/

Typical dumb as shit response.  

You shared a YouTube video that misrepresented IPCC findings. Then when I post the actual report, you decide that the IPCC can’t be trusted.  

You’re like the other climate change deniers who rail against NASA but then use one NASA report because you think it helps your cause.  

Keep being stupid.  You’ve found your niche. 

[Rod]

Would it be fair to say that kevvyboomboom is borderline retarded 

[ArcticCrusher]

6 minutes ago, DUMPY said:

Would it be fair to say that kevvyboomboom is borderline retarded 

There's no borderline nothing, he's full on retarded.

[Rod]

1 hour ago, ArcticCrusher said:

There's no borderline nothing, he's full on retarded.

He doesn’t believe in science 

[ArcticCrusher]

14 minutes ago, DUMPY said:

He doesn’t believe in science 

He's does, but it has the word fiction after it.

[Rod]

17 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said:

He's does, but it has the word fiction after it.

Pretty sure he has the big gay 

[1trailmaker]

Saskatchewan loses court case 

Ontario next

game over

 

now can DOUG swallow his pride and reopen cap and trade    doubtful 

[Rod]

13 minutes ago, 1trailmaker said:

Saskatchewan loses court case 

Ontario next

game over

 

now can DOUG swallow his pride and reopen cap and trade    doubtful 

It was a split decision. They’re taking it to the Supreme Court there ONEWAY