Jump to content
Check your account email address ×

Understanding Overproduction


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Rod Johnson said:

False. Even if sweat shop people are not paid a lot, they are making much more money than they ever were before 

Lmao. A system that creates, relies upon, and exploits poverty can't claim that it's on an antipoverty crusade. 

:lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Rod Johnson said:

The amount of people living in starvation level Poverty has fallen around 80% since 1980

how did communism do? 

link? I thought more people were on food stamps here... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, motonoggin said:

Lmao. A system that creates, relies upon, and exploits poverty can't claim that it's on an antipoverty crusade. 

:lol:

The amount of starvation level poverty has fallen about 80% since 1980. Such exploit!

how does communisms stats compare? And what are you doing to help these poor exploited people?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Highmark said:

Not what I'm saying at all.   Whoosh!  

Yes it is. By defending and supporting capitalism you are implying that you don't think people would do any work unless they're either threatened with deprivation of basic needs or enticed by avarice and envy. 

Just because that's how you may operate and how you may motivate your workers doesn't mean that's how everyone is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Rod Johnson said:

The amount of starvation level poverty has fallen about 80% since 1980. Such exploit!

how does communisms stats compare? And what are you doing to help these poor exploited people?

Posting memes?

:lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Highmark said:

They wouldn't without incentive other than food, clothing and shelter.   

Right....Galileo and Pythagoras had to dream up that physics and math shit or they wouldnt have been able to eat.

Kill yourself you short sighted moron

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Anler said:

link? I thought more people were on food stamps here... 

Being on food stamps is the opposite of starvation level poverty. Even the “poor people” in capitalism are comfortable in their living compared to others

if one makes roughly $33,000 per year they are part of the global 1%. It’s an interesting stat. This makes moto one of those greedy people he hates who won’t use his privilege to help others. Communists\socialists are quick to point out that people over seas are starving and uncomfortable and stomp their feet that the 1% are the cause. But they are the 1%. It’s always someone else that needs to do the dirty work and pay the tab though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, f7ben said:

So what Highmark is saying....is that without monetary incentive no advancements would have ever been made.

How fucking dumb do you have to be to think that?

Poast up a society that’s shown otherwise 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's such a stupid point to try and blame individual workers for the failures of capitalism. This in the global 1% shit is a complete red herring. It's all relative. And it is not the workers fault that capitalism exploits poverty, disparity, and appeals to the worst of human behavior.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, motonoggin said:

It's such a stupid point to try and blame individual workers for the failures of capitalism. This in the global 1% shit is a complete red herring. It's all relative. And it is not the workers fault that capitalism exploits poverty, disparity, and appeals to the worst of human behavior.

It’s not a red herring. It’s you trying to pass off your privilege responsibilities onto someone else. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Rod Johnson said:

Being on food stamps is the opposite of starvation level poverty. Even the “poor people” in capitalism are comfortable in their living compared to others

if one makes roughly $33,000 per year they are part of the global 1%. It’s an interesting stat. This makes moto one of those greedy people he hates who won’t use his privilege to help others. Communists\socialists are quick to point out that people over seas are starving and uncomfortable and stomp their feet that the 1% are the cause. But they are the 1%. It’s always someone else that needs to do the dirty work and pay the tab though. 

So no link then? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, f7ben said:

So what Highmark is saying....is that without monetary incentive no advancements would have ever been made.

How fucking dumb do you have to be to think that?

If people were all paid the same regardless of the quality of their work, advancement would certainly slow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Rod Johnson said:

It’s not a red herring. It’s you trying to pass off your privilege responsibilities onto someone else. 

It's absolutely a red herring, in a ham-handed attempt to try and blame the least powerful people for the actions of the most powerful. Typical blame-the-victim shit, I see it in all aspects of neoliberal/conservative ideology.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, motonoggin said:

It's absolutely a red herring, in a ham-handed attempt to try and blame the least powerful people for the actions of the most powerful. Typical blame-the-victim shit, I see it in all aspects of neoliberal/conservative ideology.

 

No it’s you typical communists that hate that stat because it exposes your greed. You are part of the elite that you hate yet refuse to self govern and redistribute your own wealth to those who have been exploited by the system that you prosper in 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
40 minutes ago, motonoggin said:

Yes it is. By defending and supporting capitalism you are implying that you don't think people would do any work unless they're either threatened with deprivation of basic needs or enticed by avarice and envy. 

Just because that's how you may operate and how you may motivate your workers doesn't mean that's how everyone is.

Jesus no I'm saying all they would be working for is food, clothing and shelter rather by concentrating on those items or trading other items/skills for those items.   There would be no mass production, not mass farming, not mass anything.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol

×
×
  • Create New...