Snoslinger Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 Just now, f7ben said: You did the squirming......pay the 100 bones and keep your dignity Wrong. The trump admin met with Russians to discuss hillary dirt. That was the bet, clearly worded. Now fuck off Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AKIQPilot Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 Just now, Snoslinger said: Wrong. The trump admin met with Russians to discuss hillary dirt. That was the bet, clearly worded. Now fuck off Lets wait and see what Mueller says. Should be any day now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted December 19, 2018 Author Share Posted December 19, 2018 1 minute ago, Snoslinger said: Wrong. The trump admin met with Russians to discuss hillary dirt. That was the bet, clearly worded. Now fuck off The bet was collusion and there was none....sbyl Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 Just now, AKIQPilot said: Lets wait and see what Mueller says. Should be any day now. That was the new criteria, since skidmark welches on the first Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted December 19, 2018 Author Share Posted December 19, 2018 The DNC planting a russian lawyer they are linked to in the meeting does not meet any criteria other than Hillary colluding with a foreign agent Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 Just now, f7ben said: The bet was collusion and there was none....sbyl Wrong again. I fucking knew skidmark would try to squeal out of that definition so I made the terms as clear as day. Are you going to make me find this again? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AKIQPilot Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 1 minute ago, Snoslinger said: That was the new criteria, since skidmark welches on the first New Criteria? You mean clarified criteria within the first 24 hours of the original bet? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 1 minute ago, f7ben said: The DNC planting a russian lawyer they are linked to in the meeting does not meet any criteria other than Hillary colluding with a foreign agent Why did the trump admin show at the meeting? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted December 19, 2018 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted December 19, 2018 6 minutes ago, Polaris 550 said: No, what can't be more clear is that you're not sure about the FDR question, you don't have 20Gs in your checking account, and you're afraid to take the bet. I thought you agreed with me months ago. What happened? You're like one of those Nigerian prince scams. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 Just now, AKIQPilot said: New Criteria? You mean clarified criteria within the first 24 hours of the original bet? Much later than that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted December 19, 2018 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted December 19, 2018 1 minute ago, Snoslinger said: Wrong again. I fucking knew skidmark would try to squeal out of that definition so I made the terms as clear as day. Are you going to make me find this again? Did you or did you not agree to Mueller making the call? Yes or no answer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 1 minute ago, f7ben said: The DNC planting a russian lawyer they are linked to in the meeting does not meet any criteria other than Hillary colluding with a foreign agent You been postin' away all fukken day, you could have lined-up the PE, AND a lawyer!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 1 minute ago, Highmark said: You're like one of those Nigerian prince scams. NIGERIAN PRINCE!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AKIQPilot Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 2 minutes ago, Highmark said: Did you or did you not agree to Mueller making the call? Yes or no answer. Ouch. HAhahaha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 7 minutes ago, Highmark said: Did you or did you not agree to Mueller making the call? Yes or no answer. Yep, after you welched on the original bet. What do you have up your sleeve for the next loss? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 15 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: Wrong. The trump admin met with Russians to discuss hillary dirt. That was the bet, clearly worded. Now fuck off That still isn’t collusion Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 So this went back to meaning snot thinks that collusion is anyone in the trump campaign talking to any person of Russian origin for any reason Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 1 minute ago, Rod Johnson said: That still isn’t collusion It was the term of the bet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted December 19, 2018 Author Share Posted December 19, 2018 11 minutes ago, Polaris 550 said: You been postin' away all fukken day, you could have lined-up the PE, AND a lawyer!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! NIGERIAN PRINCE!!! There will be no fucking lawyer you brain dead faggot ass retard. I will line up the PE and we can both agree on which one Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted December 19, 2018 Author Share Posted December 19, 2018 Just now, Snoslinger said: It was the term of the bet. So the bet was if anyone in the Trump campaign met with anyone who ever had anything loosely to do with Russia ???? And that lawyer bitch was a DNC plant......dont even try to make like she wasnt Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 2 minutes ago, f7ben said: So the bet was if anyone in the Trump campaign met with anyone who ever had anything loosely to do with Russia ???? And that lawyer bitch was a DNC plant......dont even try to make like she wasnt Those were the terms skidmark agreed to. We all fucking knew who fell under the “Russian” definition, sludgey jr. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted December 19, 2018 Author Share Posted December 19, 2018 3 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: Those were the terms skidmark agreed to. We all fucking knew who fell under the “Russian” definition, sludgey jr. Sorry.....I never saw or read anything that would give you a win because of what the DNC cooked up at Trump tower. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted December 19, 2018 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted December 19, 2018 (edited) 4 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: Those were the terms skidmark agreed to. We all fucking knew who fell under the “Russian” definition, sludgey jr. A meeting even with Russians is not collusion. Mueller decides.....end of story. Love how YOU get to define collusion.....sorry that wasn't part of the bet. col·lu·sion /kəˈlo͞oZHən/ noun secret or illegal cooperation or conspiracy, especially in order to cheat or deceive others. Shitslinger = Znutty Edited December 19, 2018 by Highmark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 Skidmark is a lying piece of shit. On 5/18/2017 at 10:40 AM, Snoslinger said: I can see where highmark is headed with this bet already. had a similar bet been made about Russian involvement at all, he'd be running around "where's the proof? just because the fbi and 5800 other agencies say it's true doesn't mean it's true" pretty fucking simple really - if evidence is found that one of the mentioned people were caught working with the Russians to damage Hillary, and help trump, that is collusion. it can be a memo, a recording, a money trail, etc. so do we have a deal or not? broski, maybe you should stay the fuck out of this? There are the terms On 5/18/2017 at 10:43 AM, Highmark said: I can accept that even though it still pretty broad. And there is the agreement. end of story Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted December 19, 2018 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted December 19, 2018 Just now, Snoslinger said: Skidmark is a lying piece of shit. There are the terms And there is the agreement. end of story So which of the below was met? pretty fucking simple really - if evidence is found that one of the mentioned people were caught working with the Russians to damage Hillary, and help trump, that is collusion. it can be a memo, a recording, a money trail, etc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted December 19, 2018 Author Share Posted December 19, 2018 3 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: Skidmark is a lying piece of shit. There are the terms And there is the agreement. end of story Yah.....and that didnt happen you fucking retard Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.