Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted September 26, 2018 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted September 26, 2018 (edited) What legal ramifications do they face? My point is there is no way for anyone to prove they are lying beyond what the so called witness' have already done. There haven't provided enough information to be proven wrong. No dates, locations just vagueness. There simply is zero evidence beyond testimony on an extremely sensitive topic. Edited September 26, 2018 by Highmark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cold War Posted September 26, 2018 Share Posted September 26, 2018 Even if they are proven liars they will not be prosecuted . We do not punish women who lie about rape or abuse. No one has the balls to do it. If it keeps one victim from coming forward it is not worth the risk. Just the way it is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 26, 2018 Share Posted September 26, 2018 9 minutes ago, Highmark said: What legal ramifications do they face? My point is there is no way for anyone to prove they are lying beyond what the so called witness' have already done. There haven't provided enough information to be proven wrong. No dates, locations just vagueness. There simply is zero evidence beyond testimony. I agree, not too much can happen to them. I don't even think they can be sued civilly. It's all orchestrated by their dem lawyers as a smear campaign, with no risk. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member steve from amherst Posted September 26, 2018 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted September 26, 2018 They can be sued but try to find a lawyer who will take a case suing someone who dosnt have much cash or liguid assets. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 26, 2018 Share Posted September 26, 2018 4 minutes ago, steve from amherst said: They can be sued but try to find a lawyer who will take a case suing someone who dosnt have much cash or liguid assets. You'd have to prove defamation of character. Whereas the bitches are simply saying what they re-call, how do you prove intentional defamation? PUBLIC FIGURES do not have the protections of private persons, unfortunately. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted September 26, 2018 Author Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted September 26, 2018 12 minutes ago, Polaris 550 said: You'd have to prove defamation of character. Whereas the bitches are simply saying what they re-call, how do you prove intentional defamation? PUBLIC FIGURES do not have the protections of private persons, unfortunately. On top of that who wants to go after them and how that makes you look. Surely not a SC justice if confirmed. I'll give the dems credit. They played this one well. Been planning it since Gorsuch. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted September 26, 2018 Share Posted September 26, 2018 1 minute ago, Highmark said: On top of that who wants to go after them and how that makes you look. Surely not a SC justice if confirmed. I'll give the dems credit. They played this one well. Been planning it since Gorsuch. Spot on! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ActionfigureJoe Posted September 26, 2018 Share Posted September 26, 2018 Bill Cosby was targeted too. Right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted September 26, 2018 Author Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted September 26, 2018 1 minute ago, ActionfigureJoe said: Bill Cosby was targeted too. Right? Yeah cause the evidence is similar right? Cosby also admitted to a "consensual" relationship with them as well. Comparing the 2 is ridiculous. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted September 26, 2018 Author Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted September 26, 2018 45 minutes ago, Polaris 550 said: I agree, not too much can happen to them. I don't even think they can be sued civilly. It's all orchestrated by their dem lawyers as a smear campaign, with no risk. On top of that hero's of the left. Imagine what their gofundme accounts will draw in? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ActionfigureJoe Posted September 26, 2018 Share Posted September 26, 2018 3 minutes ago, Highmark said: Yeah cause the evidence is similar right? Cosby also admitted to a "consensual" relationship with them as well. Comparing the 2 is ridiculous. Considering the defenders of Cosby among certain members, it’s totally relevant. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted September 26, 2018 Share Posted September 26, 2018 3 minutes ago, ActionfigureJoe said: Considering the defenders of Cosby among certain members, it’s totally relevant. Youre trying so hard. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted September 26, 2018 Author Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted September 26, 2018 (edited) 4 minutes ago, ActionfigureJoe said: Considering the defenders of Cosby among certain members, it’s totally relevant. Because someone on here defended Cosby? Evidence vs No evidence. No political motivation vs political motivation. Edited September 26, 2018 by Highmark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ActionfigureJoe Posted September 26, 2018 Share Posted September 26, 2018 2 minutes ago, Highmark said: Because someone on here defended Cosby? Evidence vs No evidence. No political motivation vs political motivation. Yeah....them women should just keep their mouth’s shut. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oleroule Posted September 26, 2018 Share Posted September 26, 2018 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted September 26, 2018 Share Posted September 26, 2018 1 hour ago, Highmark said: What legal ramifications do they face? My point is there is no way for anyone to prove they are lying beyond what the so called witness' have already done. There haven't provided enough information to be proven wrong. No dates, locations just vagueness. There simply is zero evidence beyond testimony on an extremely sensitive topic. What would Kavinough face if the accusations are true? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JEFF Posted September 26, 2018 Share Posted September 26, 2018 1 hour ago, ActionfigureJoe said: Yeah....them women should just keep their mouth’s shut. No. But after 36 years. Maybe?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted September 26, 2018 Share Posted September 26, 2018 37 minutes ago, Mainecat said: What would Kavinough face if the accusations are true? What are the accusations Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 1 hour ago, Rod Johnson said: What are the accusations Attempted rape. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XCR1250 Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 Accuser Julie Swetnick claims Kavanaugh and friends drugged and gang raped high school girls at parties she attended TEN TIMES, why would she who was a College student at the time attend parties for minor High School students and then watch rapes happening as she came back TEN TIMES to watch the rapes??? What a lying loser. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jtssrx Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
franks pond Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted September 27, 2018 Author Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted September 27, 2018 3 hours ago, Mainecat said: What would Kavinough face if the accusations are true? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted September 27, 2018 Share Posted September 27, 2018 MC fucking so hard his pants are full again Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted September 27, 2018 Author Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted September 27, 2018 Late Wednesday, The Wall Street Journal reported that approximately 10 years ago, Swetnick retained the law firm of Katz, Marshall & Banks to represent her in dispute with her former employer, insurance company New York Life, over a sexual harassment complaint Swetnick had brought. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.