NaturallyAspirated Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 1 minute ago, f7ben said: rebutted by those they accused.....seems legit Rebutted by everyone with a clear, reasonable mind. Goddard was exposed as a charlitans and became a laughingstock. Neal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted April 27, 2018 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted April 27, 2018 9 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said: Looks like we could be headed that way again, they will still call it MMGW. MMCC. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 Just now, NaturallyAspirated said: Rebutted by everyone with a clear, reasonable mind. Goddard was exposed as a charlitans and became a laughingstock. Neal Nope Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 Just now, f7ben said: Nope Are these your top two paths of faith, or do you have something a bit more concrete? Neal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 Just now, NaturallyAspirated said: Are these your top two paths of faith, or do you have something a bit more concrete? Neal Steve Koonin ....former Obama official .....listen to his talk on how governments manipulate climate data Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted April 27, 2018 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted April 27, 2018 Current CO2 levels are around 400 ppm. You can increase crop yields by as much as 30% if its at 1500 ppm. There will probably be a day when we want more CO2 in the atmosphere so we can feed everyone on the planet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 Just now, Highmark said: Current CO2 levels are around 400 ppm. You can increase crop yields by as much as 30% if its at 1500 ppm. There will probably be a day when we want more CO2 in the atmosphere so we can feed everyone on the planet. The problem is more CO2 will come with increasing temps. Feeding more people may not be our biggest concern. Neal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted April 27, 2018 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted April 27, 2018 1 minute ago, NaturallyAspirated said: The problem is more CO2 will come with increasing temps. Feeding more people may not be our biggest concern. Neal Get the sleds out! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 1 minute ago, Highmark said: Get the sleds out! No gas available there. Neal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xtralettucetomatoe580 Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 16 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said: No I don't. Well, you’re wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 10 minutes ago, Highmark said: Current CO2 levels are around 400 ppm. You can increase crop yields by as much as 30% if its at 1500 ppm. There will probably be a day when we want more CO2 in the atmosphere so we can feed everyone on the planet. It takes a level of about 180 before photosynthesis starts, below that our planet is dead. 8 minutes ago, NaturallyAspirated said: The problem is more CO2 will come with increasing temps. Feeding more people may not be our biggest concern. Neal Increasing temp increases CO2, not the other way around. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 2 minutes ago, xtralettucetomatoe580 said: Well, you’re wrong. Explain what we can do then. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xtralettucetomatoe580 Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 Just now, ArcticCrusher said: Explain what we can do then. There are a million articles on this. None of which any of us are experts on. The theories they have on how to increase and decrease co2 are well documented. Expensive, but doable from what I’ve read. Just comes down to desire. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted April 27, 2018 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted April 27, 2018 2 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said: It takes a level of about 180 before photosynthesis starts, below that our planet is dead. Increasing temp increases CO2, not the other way around. Easy......they don't like that historically that is how it occurred. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted April 27, 2018 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted April 27, 2018 Just now, xtralettucetomatoe580 said: There are a million articles on this. None of which any of us are experts on. The theories they have on how to increase and decrease co2 are well documented. Expensive, but doable from what I’ve read. Just comes down to desire. A million articles? When then it must be possible. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jtssrx Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 1 hour ago, xtralettucetomatoe580 said: Oh honey... You poor thing. Wants to be taken seriously in a topic on science. Thinks the world is flat. If every person that thought the world was flat went and killed themselves, I’d probably throw a party. You’re a joke. Twattomatoe580 I want you to take me seriously LMAO!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xtralettucetomatoe580 Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 12 minutes ago, jtssrx said: Twattomatoe580 I want you to take me seriously LMAO!!! You’re still talking? So adorable! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 19 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said: It takes a level of about 180 before photosynthesis starts, below that our planet is dead. Increasing temp increases CO2, not the other way around. That's not entirely correct. Either can lead the other and cause a positive feedback loop. Temp increase doesn't have to proceed CO2 increase. You are only 50% right. Neal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 Scientists say that at most all we’re doing is postponing the next ice age. I’m cool with that Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 21 minutes ago, Highmark said: Easy......they don't like that historically that is how it occurred. Not in all instances, in fact our current warming is following the CO2 increase. Neal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted April 27, 2018 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted April 27, 2018 Man think of the pot that could be grown in a worldwide tropical climate. Marijuana is called ‘weed’ for a reason; it can grow and thrive just about anywhere on earth. However, some climates are better suited for growing than others, and growing weed in the tropics presents unique challenges that growers in other parts of the world simply don’t face.The two biggest issues tropical growers will find are with the light cycle of the cannabis plant, and the amount of rain the plants receive. But if these challenges can be dealt with properly and conquered, tropical areas will produce some of the biggest plants growers have ever seen. https://www.marijuana-seeds.nl/blog/which-marijuana-strains-grow-in-tropical-and-wet-climates Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 5 minutes ago, NaturallyAspirated said: That's not entirely correct. Either can lead the other and cause a positive feedback loop. Temp increase doesn't have to proceed CO2 increase. You are only 50% right. Neal It always has historically......its pretty fucking simple. The Oceans are the largest Co2 sinks in the world and they can hold less gas as they warm. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 1 minute ago, NaturallyAspirated said: Not in all instances, in fact our current warming is following the CO2 increase. Neal Incorrect Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted April 27, 2018 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted April 27, 2018 1 minute ago, NaturallyAspirated said: Not in all instances, in fact our current warming is following the CO2 increase. Neal We need to pump up the CO2 man! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted April 27, 2018 Share Posted April 27, 2018 Just now, f7ben said: It always has historically......its pretty fucking simple. The Oceans are the largest Co2 sinks in the world and they can hold less gas as they warm. Incorrect, our recent warming g is well in lag of CO2 increase. I agree that a warming ocean will absorb less CO2. It will be bad news when it starts to dissipate that sink. Neal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.