Jump to content
Check your account email address ×

Fun fact about ethanol


Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, XCR1250 said:

Race Fuel doesn't make more HP.

Not necessarily true.  The fuel must match the engine.  If you have a massivly high compression engine you need to match the fuel and octane rating to it.  Using a lower (non race fuel) can cause problems and result in lower HP output.  For engine efficiency and power, higher compression is desirable.

Neal

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, NaturallyAspirated said:

Not necessarily true.  The fuel must match the engine.  If you have a massivly high compression engine you need to match the fuel and octane rating to it.  Using a lower (non race fuel) can cause problems and result in lower HP output.  For engine efficiency and power, higher compression is desirable.

Neal

Obviously Neal, but using a higher octane in any engine that needs only 87 will do nothing except waste money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, XCR1250 said:

Obviously Neal, but using a higher octane in any engine that needs only 87 will do nothing except waste money.

yup

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My bro in law runs 3 circle track cars. all 10:1 motors. Could easily run pump 93 but they are forced to by Sunoco race fuel. huge waste of money

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, XCR1250 said:

Obviously Neal, but using a higher octane in any engine that needs only 87 will do nothing except waste money.

Indeed, but you can't get the same HP out of a engine designed for 110 octane using 87.  It will produce less.   The high compression engine will be more efficient.

Neal

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, NaturallyAspirated said:

Indeed, but you can't get the same HP out of a engine designed for 110 octane using 87.  It will produce less.   The high compression engine will be more efficient.

Neal

Only because of detonation. And it will make the same power until it starts to detonate, which probably wont take long.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When cars were forced to pass emissions compression ratios were dropped and mileage went way down, so it's true they produced less pollution but used more fuel so where was the benefit? My 1968 Pontiac Executive 400 cu.in. got 23 MPG and was a huge boat.

3 minutes ago, NaturallyAspirated said:

Indeed, but you can't get the same HP out of a engine designed for 110 octane using 87.  It will produce less.   The high compression engine will be more efficient.

Neal

Again that's obvious, my point was some folks think using race gas or premium in their street cars or trucks will make it faster/quicker and that is simply not a fact. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ATOMIC PUNK said:

octane is for detonation period.. it doesn't make more power..

Incorrect, it can/will make more HP in a engine designed with higher compression.  

The energy content in the fuel is the same, but the efficiency in extraction of that energy matters.

Higher compression engines (as a general rule) are more efficient.

Neal

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Legend said:

Only because of detonation. And it will make the same power until it starts to detonate, which probably wont take long.

Exactly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, NaturallyAspirated said:

Incorrect, it can/will make more HP in a engine designed with higher compression.  

The energy content in the fuel is the same, but the efficiency in extraction of that energy matters.

Higher compression engines (as a general rule) are more efficient.

Neal

Ok kneel. You’re the expert as always

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, NaturallyAspirated said:

True, but an engine designed with higher compression will be more efficient.  

Neal

So kneel I’d this high compression static or dynamic?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After compression ratios went down I had bought a 1978 Riviera with a 403 cu.in. engine, it got 11-12MPG, 1/2 of what the much higher C.R.Pontiac got.

Edited by XCR1250
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, NaturallyAspirated said:

True, but an engine designed with higher compression will be more efficient.  

Neal

Are we talking fuel or engines?

Because I thought we were talking fuel.

But if you want to talk engines, then just turbo the fucking thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol

×
×
  • Create New...