*** OFFICIAL Doug Ford thread ***

[1trailmaker]

lol

https://www.notdoug.com/

 

Social media has given interest groups the chances to promote or  destroy an election or a person within that election.  where ads on TV are banned from a certain date your local social media has no rules 

 

this really is an issue for all 

[Momorider]

2 hours ago, 1trailmaker said:

lol

https://www.notdoug.com/

 

Social media has given interest groups the chances to promote or  destroy an election or a person within that election.  where ads on TV are banned from a certain date your local social media has no rules 

 

this really is an issue for all 

Who is going to even know about that site  

[1trailmaker]

51 minutes ago, Momorider said:

Who is going to even know about that site  

internet liberal anti Doug  junkies are posting it - if gets shared dummy 

 

you should know this since you are a prime example of what a fake meme can do to a persons knowledge of the real facts - something you lack 

 

 

[revrnd]

https://www.thestar.com/news/queenspark/2018/04/09/doug-ford-distances-himself-from-former-leadership-rival-tanya-granic-allen-over-tweets-on-muslims-gays.html

Quote

In one blog post now drawing attention on social media, Granic Allen took aim at Muslim dress after Quebec proposed a controversial charter of values in 2013.

“What I do take issue with is the niqab and burka because they are masks which cover the face. I don’t believe people should dress like ninjas,” she wrote.

“I don’t believe that people should dress like bank robbers when going to vote,” she added, also comparing burkas to her daughter wearing a “Spider-Man mask.”

Discuss

[Puzzleboy]

Litigation applies to social media, too. 

On 4/6/2018 at 1:59 PM, 1trailmaker said:

lol

https://www.notdoug.com/

 

Social media has given interest groups the chances to promote or  destroy an election or a person within that election.  where ads on TV are banned from a certain date your local social media has no rules 

 

this really is an issue for all 

[ArcticCrusher]

7 hours ago, revrnd said:

https://www.thestar.com/news/queenspark/2018/04/09/doug-ford-distances-himself-from-former-leadership-rival-tanya-granic-allen-over-tweets-on-muslims-gays.html

Discuss

What's to discuss, she's right.

[Usedtoskidoo]

48 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said:

What's to discuss, she's right.

But the media party will soon call her a racist or Islamophobe

[02sled]

9 hours ago, revrnd said:

https://www.thestar.com/news/queenspark/2018/04/09/doug-ford-distances-himself-from-former-leadership-rival-tanya-granic-allen-over-tweets-on-muslims-gays.html

Discuss

 

1 hour ago, ArcticCrusher said:

What's to discuss, she's right.

For the most part she really is. Including the fight against the Wynne government’s sex education curriculum and a law banning “conversion therapy” for gay teens.

[1trailmaker]

10 hours ago, Puzzleboy said:

Litigation applies to social media, too. 

  GOOD ONE

[1trailmaker]

10 hours ago, revrnd said:

https://www.thestar.com/news/queenspark/2018/04/09/doug-ford-distances-himself-from-former-leadership-rival-tanya-granic-allen-over-tweets-on-muslims-gays.html

Discuss

 

2 hours ago, ArcticCrusher said:

What's to discuss, she's right.

 

1 hour ago, Usedtoskidoo said:

But the media party will soon call her a racist or Islamophobe

 

58 minutes ago, 02sled said:

 

For the most part she really is. Including the fight against the Wynne government’s sex education curriculum and a law banning “conversion therapy” for gay teens.

 

So you guys are advocates of Government dictating what you are allowed to wear   

What a controlling bunch of Right Wingers   

 

Question for 02sled on Sex Ed - for those kids already through the program would there be a debriefing class setup to correct their current education on the subject   I mean it would be real worrisome if they spoke out to the newly sex educated children

So not an issue

 

Too bad for Tayna, she would have been entertaining to have around Doug

[ArcticCrusher]

12 minutes ago, 1trailmaker said:

 

 

 

 

So you guys are advocates of Government dictating what you are allowed to wear   

What a controlling bunch of Right Wingers   

 

Question for 02sled on Sex Ed - for those kids already through the program would there be a debriefing class setup to correct their current education on the subject   I mean it would be real worrisome if they spoke out to the newly sex educated children

So not an issue

 

Too bad for Tayna, she would have been entertaining to have around Doug

There are valid reasons why Europe and moderate Muslim countries have banned them.

[02sled]

3 minutes ago, 1trailmaker said:

 

 

 

 

So you guys are advocates of Government dictating what you are allowed to wear   

What a controlling bunch of Right Wingers   

 

Question for 02sled on Sex Ed - for those kids already through the program would there be a debriefing class setup to correct their current education on the subject   I mean it would be real worrisome if they spoke out to the newly sex educated children

So not an issue

 

Too bad for Tayna, she would have been entertaining to have around Doug

More Fail imaginations.... no.... you can wear whatever you want Fail. Just means you don't get a driver's license, or a passport since both require your photo.... oh that includes an OHIP card. That is why they moved to photo's on OHIP cards. People passing around the old red and white ones. Don't try cashing a cheque at the few places that still accept them since they want photo id. Forget about driving even if you could get a license since your vision would be impaired. Basically anything that requires you to be able to prove who you are? It would make for an interesting situation at airports where they validate that you match your photo ID at security and while boarding.

At the same time people shouldn't be able to mandate a Muslim dress code for a community like they tried to do in Montreal. They wanted a community that required everyone to abide by the proper standards of Muslim modesty... oh and all liquor would be banned from the area.

As for the sex ed.... Wynnebag just wants to promote HER agenda. It has nothing to do with what's good for the kids. Let kids be kids.

A prime example is Wynnebag making it ILLEGAL for kids who may be confused about their sexual orientation to see a doctor that would steer them toward heterosexuality but would encourage homosexuality.

[ArcticCrusher]

2 minutes ago, 02sled said:

More Fail imaginations.... no.... you can wear whatever you want Fail. Just means you don't get a driver's license, or a passport since both require your photo.... oh that includes an OHIP card. That is why they moved to photo's on OHIP cards. People passing around the old red and white ones. Don't try cashing a cheque at the few places that still accept them since they want photo id. Forget about driving even if you could get a license since your vision would be impaired. Basically anything that requires you to be able to prove who you are? It would make for an interesting situation at airports where they validate that you match your photo ID at security and while boarding.

At the same time people shouldn't be able to mandate a Muslim dress code for a community like they tried to do in Montreal. They wanted a community that required everyone to abide by the proper standards of Muslim modesty... oh and all liquor would be banned from the area.

As for the sex ed.... Wynnebag just wants to promote HER agenda. It has nothing to do with what's good for the kids. Let kids be kids.

A prime example is Wynnebag making it ILLEGAL for kids who may be confused about their sexual orientation to see a doctor that would steer them toward heterosexuality but would encourage homosexuality.

Problem is the kid can make that decision without a parent.  Lets promote the gay.

[1trailmaker]

1 minute ago, ArcticCrusher said:

There are valid reasons why Europe and moderate Muslim countries have banned them.

wouldn't be my choice of clothing but it isn't up to me to decide.

If you are concerned with repression of women, going after a burka does nothing to solve the problem.   If Cons were really concerned they would deal with the real situations.

 

banning clothes solves it   

[1trailmaker]

4 minutes ago, 02sled said:

More Fail imaginations.... no.... you can wear whatever you want Fail. Just means you don't get a driver's license, or a passport since both require your photo.... oh that includes an OHIP card. That is why they moved to photo's on OHIP cards. People passing around the old red and white ones. Don't try cashing a cheque at the few places that still accept them since they want photo id. Forget about driving even if you could get a license since your vision would be impaired. Basically anything that requires you to be able to prove who you are? It would make for an interesting situation at airports where they validate that you match your photo ID at security and while boarding.

At the same time people shouldn't be able to mandate a Muslim dress code for a community like they tried to do in Montreal. They wanted a community that required everyone to abide by the proper standards of Muslim modesty... oh and all liquor would be banned from the area.

As for the sex ed.... Wynnebag just wants to promote HER agenda. It has nothing to do with what's good for the kids. Let kids be kids.

A prime example is Wynnebag making it ILLEGAL for kids who may be confused about their sexual orientation to see a doctor that would steer them toward heterosexuality but would encourage homosexuality.

  they all show their face to get a passport and everything else you babbling on about - try facts 

 

Montreal, did they pass a law on this?  NO 

 

on SEX ED   read the curriculum, clearly you haven't.....  nor has Doug or even Tanya - Doug got his info from a 6 year old   

non issue

 

Any parent that takes a kid to a doctor to talk about being Gay, they are the ones that need help not the child -   just Pathetic 

[02sled]

9 minutes ago, 1trailmaker said:

  they all show their face to get a passport and everything else you babbling on about - try facts 

 

Montreal, did they pass a law on this?  NO 

 

on SEX ED   read the curriculum, clearly you haven't.....  nor has Doug or even Tanya - Doug got his info from a 6 year old   

non issue

 

Any parent that takes a kid to a doctor to talk about being Gay, they are the ones that need help not the child -   just Pathetic 

Poor poor Fail... driver's license.... You realize you can't get a driver's license in Ontario if you're wearing a hat. You have to take it off.  ... now the cop pulls them over and wants to see the driver's license. How does he know who or what is underneath. But you seem to know otherwise.

If you need a new photo, you need to visit a ServiceOntario centre to have one taken.
The picture on your photo I.D. must be:
completely visible
free of any obstructions
a neutral expression
Headwear worn for religious or medical reasons can be worn, but must not cover any part of your face.
You may be asked to remove any head or face wear (e.g., eyeglasses) when taking a photo for government-issued identification.

So how do they get that license?

As for Montreal they have tried twice to get it passed... are you really foolish enough to think there won't be a third attempt and that they won't continue until they succeed? The second attempt garnered more support than the first attempt as the number of Muslim refugees / immigrants continue to increase.

So you're happy with kids being encouraged to be gay and being encouraged to be heterosexual is ILLEGAL. Got it... you're a closeted gay.

[1trailmaker]

29 minutes ago, 02sled said:

Poor poor Fail... driver's license.... You realize you can't get a driver's license in Ontario if you're wearing a hat. You have to take it off.  ... now the cop pulls them over and wants to see the driver's license. How does he know who or what is underneath. But you seem to know otherwise.

If you need a new photo, you need to visit a ServiceOntario centre to have one taken.
The picture on your photo I.D. must be:
completely visible
free of any obstructions
a neutral expression
Headwear worn for religious or medical reasons can be worn, but must not cover any part of your face.
You may be asked to remove any head or face wear (e.g., eyeglasses) when taking a photo for government-issued identification.

So how do they get that license?

As for Montreal they have tried twice to get it passed... are you really foolish enough to think there won't be a third attempt and that they won't continue until they succeed? The second attempt garnered more support than the first attempt as the number of Muslim refugees / immigrants continue to increase.

So you're happy with kids being encouraged to be gay and being encouraged to be heterosexual is ILLEGAL. Got it... you're a closeted gay.

fake license - they show their face - keep trying slugger 

 

Ya they will try agian and again to make new laws or regulations  it is within your rights as a Canadian - or do you wish to ban this Right too? 

Remember all the Christians fighting against Sunday store openings   it was their right to do so no matter how stupid it was.

 

who encourages anyone to be anyone but themselves   certainly not Schools - I think in most cases Parents do this on a regular basis.  

LOL closet Gay - nice debate tactic  

[02sled]

18 minutes ago, 1trailmaker said:

fake license - they show their face - keep trying slugger 

 

Ya they will try agian and again to make new laws or regulations  it is within your rights as a Canadian - or do you wish to ban this Right too? 

Remember all the Christians fighting against Sunday store openings   it was their right to do so no matter how stupid it was.

 

who encourages anyone to be anyone but themselves   certainly not Schools - I think in most cases Parents do this on a regular basis.  

LOL closet Gay - nice debate tactic  

Stupid stupid Fail... without any comprehension skills. I know it's fake. You didn't comprehend the part of the post that was all in bold did you?

Headwear worn for religious or medical reasons can be worn, but must not cover any part of your face.
You may be asked to remove any head or face wear (e.g., eyeglasses) when taking a photo for government-issued identification.

However their religion doesn't allow them to be uncovered in public so how do they get that license photo at a Service Ontario office? Kind of a chicken and egg question. They can't be uncovered in public but the Service Ontario office is a public space.

So now you equate objecting to Sunday store openings to neighbourhoods / communities setting a dress and behaviour code.

As for encouraging a sexual orientation.... Wynnebag took care of that making it illegal to send their kid to therapy which is intended to dissuade them from being homosexual and being heterosexual.

[1trailmaker]

2 minutes ago, 02sled said:

Stupid stupid Fail... without any comprehension skills. I know it's fake. You didn't comprehend the part of the post that was all in bold did you?

Headwear worn for religious or medical reasons can be worn, but must not cover any part of your face.
You may be asked to remove any head or face wear (e.g., eyeglasses) when taking a photo for government-issued identification.

However their religion doesn't allow them to be uncovered in public so how do they get that license photo at a Service Ontario office? Kind of a chicken and egg question. They can't be uncovered in public but the Service Ontario office is a public space.

So now you equate objecting to Sunday store openings to neighbourhoods / communities setting a dress and behaviour code.

As for encouraging a sexual orientation.... Wynnebag took care of that making it illegal to send their kid to therapy which is intended to dissuade them from being homosexual and being heterosexual.

Again any parent that takes their child to the doctor because they say they might be gay is a fucked up Parent wishing their child wasn't thinking GAY - there is no other reason to brainwash or beat the gay out of anyone.  Only in the RIGHT WING control world 

Doug will set it straight with his Stork tale for the kids to learn from

Read the curriculum

 

In the case of being pulled over, for one thing driving with one of those on would be very difficult, I have never seen one on the street yet.  But in any case the cop if not female would ask for a female officer, that officer can and has the right to see their face - end of that story 

 

Try helping repressed women instead of spreading hate would be a better suggestion  

 

 

[02sled]

17 minutes ago, 1trailmaker said:

Again any parent that takes their child to the doctor because they say they might be gay is a fucked up Parent wishing their child wasn't thinking GAY - there is no other reason to brainwash or beat the gay out of anyone.  Only in the RIGHT WING control world 

Doug will set it straight with his Stork tale for the kids to learn from

Read the curriculum

 

In the case of being pulled over, for one thing driving with one of those on would be very difficult, I have never seen one on the street yet.  But in any case the cop if not female would ask for a female officer, that officer can and has the right to see their face - end of that story 

 

Try helping repressed women instead of spreading hate would be a better suggestion  

 

 

Poor poor Fail. Female officer or male officer wouldn't make a difference. They are on the side of a road. They aren't going to uncover their head in public.

I guess in your world no kid has ever questioned their orientation or been unsure and needed professional guidance to figure it out. That professional would break the law to encourage the kid to be heterosexual but wouldn't be breaking the law to encourage the kid to be homosexual.

[1trailmaker]

42 minutes ago, 02sled said:

Poor poor Fail. Female officer or male officer wouldn't make a difference. They are on the side of a road. They aren't going to uncover their head in public.

I guess in your world no kid has ever questioned their orientation or been unsure and needed professional guidance to figure it out. That professional would break the law to encourage the kid to be heterosexual but wouldn't be breaking the law to encourage the kid to be homosexual.

maybe Odot can chime in on this, I would say she/he would have a good chance of being arrested - and YES a female makes all the difference.

 

You are bringing the child to the doctor because he says he might be GAY, you are not taking them because they are heterosexual.....  These parents have one goal and that is to beat the gay out of them, no other reason - GAY couples don't take their child to the doctor because they are heterosexual dumb ass only straight parents worry about it 

That parent is welcome to degrade their child for being gay and try to change them at home - what is the issue   besides you losing your child's trust.

 

02sled do you keep bringing your child to the brainwashing doctor until he decides he is Heterosexual or do you accept the doctor saying "well Cliffy your son/daughter is gay"  then what?  Take him to the Priest   for some healthy one on one

This parent will not be happy ever - sad   

 

Edited April 10, 2018 by 1trailmaker

[Puzzleboy]

Well, as homosexuality is unnatural, and it's prevalence would cause our species to die out..... I would think correcting it is a worthy goal.  Nothing to do with conservatism; it's scientific. 

1 hour ago, 1trailmaker said:

fake license - they show their face - keep trying slugger 

 

Ya they will try agian and again to make new laws or regulations  it is within your rights as a Canadian - or do you wish to ban this Right too? 

Remember all the Christians fighting against Sunday store openings   it was their right to do so no matter how stupid it was.

 

who encourages anyone to be anyone but themselves   certainly not Schools - I think in most cases Parents do this on a regular basis.  

LOL closet Gay - nice debate tactic  

[02sled]

12 minutes ago, 1trailmaker said:

maybe Odot can chime in on this, I would say she/he would have a good chance of being arrested - and YES a female makes all the difference.

 

You are bringing the child to the doctor because he says he might be GAY, you are not taking them because they are heterosexual.....  These parents have one goal and that is to beat the gay out of them, no other reason - GAY couples don't take their child to the doctor because they are heterosexual dumb ass only straight parents worry about it 

That parent is welcome to degrade their child for being gay and try to change them at home - what is the issue   besides you losing your child's trust.

 

02sled do you keep bringing your child to the brainwashing doctor until he decides he is Heterosexual or do you accept the doctor saying "well Cliffy your son/daughter is gay"  then what?  Take him to the Priest   for some healthy one on one

This parent will not be happy ever - sad   

 

More stupidity as usual... the kid is questioning themselves. You don't take them to a doctor to beat it out of them you take them to have a professional help guide them through figuring it all out. 

Leave the kid to work it out on their own is irresponsible. Being a teenager can be a very confusing time at best.

[1trailmaker]

44 minutes ago, Puzzleboy said:

Well, as homosexuality is unnatural, and it's prevalence would cause our species to die out..... I would think correcting it is a worthy goal.  Nothing to do with conservatism; it's scientific. 

since the beginning of time Gays have been here and beaten to death, that is the reason the bible's mention the topic.   It hasn't been stopped in 1000's of years but you are sure a good brainwashing at the doctors is all that is needed - who cares if it fucks up the kid 

And its unnatural to you, its quite normal for that gay person.

 

Many heterosexuals chose not to have children is this too bringing ManKind to an end   

not sure if you are aware but Men don't have children women do, they might be gay or not it makes no difference .   

Within the gay community Gay Women will have children with Gay men - so your theory is fucking retarded 

[1trailmaker]

48 minutes ago, 02sled said:

More stupidity as usual... the kid is questioning themselves. You don't take them to a doctor to beat it out of them you take them to have a professional help guide them through figuring it all out. 

Leave the kid to work it out on their own is irresponsible. Being a teenager can be a very confusing time at best.

What if you don't like Girls or Men and kinda don't want anything to do with either   more doctors?  

sorry 02sled there isn't anything to workout, its the parents that have the issue not the child or teen.

 

Do you know why many Seniors end up GAY   because they were gay from day one and back in the day you just denied your own feelings.

Really 02sled time to move forward and not back to the 1800's