Ez ryder Posted December 13, 2017 Share Posted December 13, 2017 39 minutes ago, Highmark said: You know you will lose. I knew you would back out. Sno: "I win because I decide who wins our bet." liberal 101 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wildboer Posted December 13, 2017 Share Posted December 13, 2017 34 minutes ago, Ez ryder said: really he ius back for less than a hr and you start hitting on him It's slim pickins in here 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AKIQPilot Posted December 13, 2017 Share Posted December 13, 2017 1 hour ago, Snoslinger said: perfect example of what I've been talking about. anyone with any sense now knows the trump admin colluded with the Russians to damage Hillary. we have known meetings, recovered e-mails, admissions, etc etc etc of it yet in your dumb fuck mind, there's no collusion what a welcher you are, and a dumb one at that. Rumors on the interwebs is Mueller is wrapping up his investigation within the next few weeks or month. You agree'd that Muellers special council would be the final say as to whether there was collusion or not. We might get the answer to that by February. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted December 13, 2017 Share Posted December 13, 2017 Just now, AKIQPilot said: Rumors on the interwebs is Mueller is wrapping up his investigation within the next few weeks or month. You agree'd that Muellers special council would be the final say as to whether there was collusion or not. We might get the answer to that by February. your rumor mills have been pretty accurate thus far this investigation runs deeper than just a simple "yes" or "no" for collusion. Mueller is going to find all the reasons behind it and hopefully bring more damaging charges to the trump admin. I say hopefully because as I've said all along, the gop is in the majority and will assist trump in squirming out of all this. the recent reactions from the rwws and their "news" sources regarding mueller are quite comical. if all Mueller wanted to do was show some collusion existed, he likely could have stopped months ago, soon after dipshit jr's meeting with the Russians was revealed. now add to that all the things we've learned since. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AKIQPilot Posted December 13, 2017 Share Posted December 13, 2017 1 minute ago, Snoslinger said: your rumor mills have been pretty accurate thus far this investigation runs deeper than just a simple "yes" or "no" for collusion. Mueller is going to find all the reasons behind it and hopefully bring more damaging charges to the trump admin. I say hopefully because as I've said all along, the gop is in the majority and will assist trump in squirming out of all this. the recent reactions from the rwws and their "news" sources regarding mueller are quite comical. if all Mueller wanted to do was show some collusion existed, he likely could have stopped months ago, soon after dipshit jr's meeting with the Russians was revealed. now add to that all the things we've learned since. So Muellers decision on collusion is the final answer then? If he says there was collusion the Highmark pays you? If he doesn't say there was collusion then you pay Highmark? Lets clear this up once and for all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted December 13, 2017 Share Posted December 13, 2017 Just now, AKIQPilot said: So Muellers decision on collusion is the final answer then? If he says there was collusion the Highmark pays you? If he doesn't say there was collusion then you pay Highmark? Lets clear this up once and for all. why do we need to rely on Mueller's decision? what if he's kicked off this and never gets to make that call? when the bet was made it was obvious skidmark welcher thought nobody in the trump admin was working with any Russians to help trump win. that has been proven and skidmark should have paid up. the bet didn't focus around trump signing a piece of paper admitting it. but to answer your question, Mueller's decision is about the last straw skidmark welcher has, so I guess that's the deciding factor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted December 13, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted December 13, 2017 Just now, Snoslinger said: why do we need to rely on Mueller's decision? what if he's kicked off this and never gets to make that call? when the bet was made it was obvious skidmark welcher thought nobody in the trump admin was working with any Russians to help trump win. that has been proven and skidmark should have paid up. the bet didn't focus around trump signing a piece of paper admitting it. but to answer your question, Mueller's decision is about the last straw skidmark welcher has, so I guess that's the deciding factor. You honestly think its fair to have you as the only judge? You are a piece of work. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AKIQPilot Posted December 13, 2017 Share Posted December 13, 2017 6 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: why do we need to rely on Mueller's decision? what if he's kicked off this and never gets to make that call? when the bet was made it was obvious skidmark welcher thought nobody in the trump admin was working with any Russians to help trump win. that has been proven and skidmark should have paid up. the bet didn't focus around trump signing a piece of paper admitting it. but to answer your question, Mueller's decision is about the last straw skidmark welcher has, so I guess that's the deciding factor. Ok good. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted December 13, 2017 Share Posted December 13, 2017 6 minutes ago, Highmark said: You honestly think its fair to have you as the only judge? You are a piece of work. facts speak for themselves, dufus. we have various forms of evidence that prove the trump admin did indeed work with Russians to damage Hillary in the election. aka "collusion". welcher Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted December 13, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted December 13, 2017 Just now, Snoslinger said: facts speak for themselves, dufus. we have various forms of evidence that prove the trump admin did indeed work with Russians to damage Hillary in the election. aka "collusion". welcher According to you dickhead. Meeting with the "Russian's" in of itself is not collusion as nothing has proven to come from said meeting. Its too bad your pea fucking brain cannot understand the concept that in order for collusion to have occurred an agreement had to take place to defraud someone. Collusion An agreement between two or more people to defraud a person of his or her rights or to obtain something that is prohibitedby law. A secret arrangement wherein two or more people whose legal interests seemingly conflict conspire to commit Fraud uponanother person; a pact between two people to deceive a court with the purpose of obtaining something that they would notbe able to get through legitimate judicial channels. collusion n. where two persons (or business entities through their officers or other employees) enter into a deceitful agreement, usuallysecret, to defraud and/or gain an unfair advantage over a third party, competitors, consumers or those with whom they arenegotiating. Collusion can include secret price or wage fixing, secret rebates, or pretending to be independent of each otherwhen actually conspiring together for their joint ends. It can range from small-town shopkeepers or heirs to a grandma'sestate, to gigantic electronics companies or big league baseball team owners. (See: fraud) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angry ginger Posted December 13, 2017 Share Posted December 13, 2017 1 hour ago, Snoslinger said: your rumor mills have been pretty accurate thus far this investigation runs deeper than just a simple "yes" or "no" for collusion. Mueller is going to find all the reasons behind it and hopefully bring more damaging charges to the trump admin. I say hopefully because as I've said all along, the gop is in the majority and will assist trump in squirming out of all this. the recent reactions from the rwws and their "news" sources regarding mueller are quite comical. if all Mueller wanted to do was show some collusion existed, he likely could have stopped months ago, soon after dipshit jr's meeting with the Russians was revealed. now add to that all the things we've learned since. kinda like the left and the FBI ignored evidence and gave Clinton a free pass Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted December 13, 2017 Share Posted December 13, 2017 6 hours ago, Wildboer said: Libertarian socialism exists, fuck outta here with your nonsense. I was drunk and hoping I'd wake up to find someone triggered... Thanks for falling for it, it brightened my morning to see this =] Faggot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wildboer Posted December 13, 2017 Share Posted December 13, 2017 11 minutes ago, Snake said: Faggot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muskoka Rider Posted December 13, 2017 Share Posted December 13, 2017 8 hours ago, Snake said: You didn't show shit. STFUASD. Don't call you a faggot buy you're gonna throw around Hun? STFUASD. Nobody cares so why don't he STFUASD? OK, you care, my mistake. I do not know why he does what he does, why would you ask me? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.